论树木拦路与摄像头记录窃贼:英语和德语中逆范围可用性的实验比较

IF 1.6 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Mareike Philipp;Malte Zimmermann
{"title":"论树木拦路与摄像头记录窃贼:英语和德语中逆范围可用性的实验比较","authors":"Mareike Philipp;Malte Zimmermann","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48044,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Inquiry","volume":"56 2","pages":"209-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Experimental Comparison of the Availability of Inverse Scope in English and German\",\"authors\":\"Mareike Philipp;Malte Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/ling_a_00493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":48044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"209-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10966490/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10966490/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了两个离线实验,对德语和英语中存在主语和普遍宾语的双重量化句子进行解释,据报道,这两个实验只允许在英语中进行反向阅读。我们表明,对于这种特定的句法结构,没有绝对的跨语言差异,但只有一个渐进的差异,英语比德语更容易允许反向范围。这支持跨语言统一的逆范围分析,在此基础上,语言之间的逐渐差异遵循语言特定属性和暴露效应。结果还表明,具有不确定词头NPs的关系从句允许反向阅读,从而挑战其作为范围孤岛的地位(May 1977, Huang 1995),同时符合语义描述中的内省主张(Barker 2012, 2019)。最后,我们的研究结果表明,说话者之间的差异很大,语用学的影响很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Experimental Comparison of the Availability of Inverse Scope in English and German
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Inquiry
Linguistic Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Linguistic Inquiry leads the field in research on current topics in linguistics. This key resource explores new theoretical developments based on the latest international scholarship, capturing the excitement of contemporary debate in full-scale articles as well as shorter contributions (Squibs and Discussion) and more extensive commentary (Remarks and Replies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信