布尔戈斯大学医院骨科手术和创伤的医疗信息和患者同意状况(2017-2018年期间)

Q3 Medicine
Jacobo Salvat Dávila , Juan Salvat Puig , Jesús María Gonçalves Estella , Secundino Vicente González
{"title":"布尔戈斯大学医院骨科手术和创伤的医疗信息和患者同意状况(2017-2018年期间)","authors":"Jacobo Salvat Dávila ,&nbsp;Juan Salvat Puig ,&nbsp;Jesús María Gonçalves Estella ,&nbsp;Secundino Vicente González","doi":"10.1016/j.reml.2022.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The principle of autonomy is the basis of the informed consent concept. Informed consent is a patient´s right consisting in prior to the medical intervention being carried out on his body, he must express his agreement that it must be preceded by the proper information that allows him to decide according to his interests. In this work, our objective was to know the status of medical information and informed consent of the patient in the Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery Service of the University Hospital of Burgos.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An anonymous questionnaire was prepared and distributed among 647 orthopedic surgery and trauma patients at the University Hospital of Burgos. Subsequently, a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational quantitative study was carried out. The association of sociodemographic variables with the responses to the questionnaire items was studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only 28.9% of the patients know that information is a right, but the majority (97.3%) expressed the need to receive information on risks and complications of the treatment and consider that the information does not increase fear or anxiety (63.4%). The majority stated that they were informed about the care performance (98.1%), understanding the explanations received (98.0%). The time used was sufficient (73.7%). In general, the information received was rated as sufficient (89.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most of the patients felt informed and considered that the time that the doctor had had for this was sufficient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35705,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","volume":"48 4","pages":"Pages 144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estado de la información médica y el consentimiento del paciente en cirugía ortopédica y traumatología en el Hospital Universitario de Burgos (periodo 2017-2018)\",\"authors\":\"Jacobo Salvat Dávila ,&nbsp;Juan Salvat Puig ,&nbsp;Jesús María Gonçalves Estella ,&nbsp;Secundino Vicente González\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reml.2022.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The principle of autonomy is the basis of the informed consent concept. Informed consent is a patient´s right consisting in prior to the medical intervention being carried out on his body, he must express his agreement that it must be preceded by the proper information that allows him to decide according to his interests. In this work, our objective was to know the status of medical information and informed consent of the patient in the Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery Service of the University Hospital of Burgos.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An anonymous questionnaire was prepared and distributed among 647 orthopedic surgery and trauma patients at the University Hospital of Burgos. Subsequently, a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational quantitative study was carried out. The association of sociodemographic variables with the responses to the questionnaire items was studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only 28.9% of the patients know that information is a right, but the majority (97.3%) expressed the need to receive information on risks and complications of the treatment and consider that the information does not increase fear or anxiety (63.4%). The majority stated that they were informed about the care performance (98.1%), understanding the explanations received (98.0%). The time used was sufficient (73.7%). In general, the information received was rated as sufficient (89.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most of the patients felt informed and considered that the time that the doctor had had for this was sufficient.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 144-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473222000049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473222000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自主原则是知情同意概念的基础。知情同意是病人的一项权利,包括在对其身体进行医疗干预之前,他必须表示同意,在进行干预之前必须获得适当的信息,使他能够根据自己的利益作出决定。在这项工作中,我们的目标是了解布尔戈斯大学医院创伤和整形外科服务部患者的医疗信息状况和知情同意情况。材料与方法对布尔戈斯大学医院的647例骨科手术和创伤患者进行匿名问卷调查。随后,进行了描述性、横断面、观察性定量研究。研究了社会人口学变量与问卷项目回答的关系。结果只有28.9%的患者知道信息是一种权利,但大多数(97.3%)表示需要获得有关治疗风险和并发症的信息,并认为这些信息不会增加恐惧或焦虑(63.4%)。大多数人表示他们被告知护理表现(98.1%),理解所收到的解释(98.0%)。所用时间充足(73.7%)。总的来说,收到的信息被评为充分(89.8%)。结论大多数患者认为医生对其知情,并认为医生给予的时间是足够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estado de la información médica y el consentimiento del paciente en cirugía ortopédica y traumatología en el Hospital Universitario de Burgos (periodo 2017-2018)

Introduction

The principle of autonomy is the basis of the informed consent concept. Informed consent is a patient´s right consisting in prior to the medical intervention being carried out on his body, he must express his agreement that it must be preceded by the proper information that allows him to decide according to his interests. In this work, our objective was to know the status of medical information and informed consent of the patient in the Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery Service of the University Hospital of Burgos.

Material and methods

An anonymous questionnaire was prepared and distributed among 647 orthopedic surgery and trauma patients at the University Hospital of Burgos. Subsequently, a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational quantitative study was carried out. The association of sociodemographic variables with the responses to the questionnaire items was studied.

Results

Only 28.9% of the patients know that information is a right, but the majority (97.3%) expressed the need to receive information on risks and complications of the treatment and consider that the information does not increase fear or anxiety (63.4%). The majority stated that they were informed about the care performance (98.1%), understanding the explanations received (98.0%). The time used was sufficient (73.7%). In general, the information received was rated as sufficient (89.8%).

Conclusions

Most of the patients felt informed and considered that the time that the doctor had had for this was sufficient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal
Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信