在物理治疗博士学生的混合教学中使用基于在线判断的儿科功能测量的体验式学习活动

H. Dumas, Ann C Golub-Victor
{"title":"在物理治疗博士学生的混合教学中使用基于在线判断的儿科功能测量的体验式学习活动","authors":"H. Dumas, Ann C Golub-Victor","doi":"10.1097/jte.0000000000000214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose. Mandated remote instruction provided an opportunity to introduce Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students to online judgment-based measures used in clinical practice. In this method/model presentation, we report the operational feasibility, educational outcomes, and student satisfaction of a new learning activity providing entry-level DPT students with the experience to administer, score, and interpret the results of a pediatric, online, judgment-based functional assessment. Method/Model Description and Evaluation. Following introduction and demonstration, student pairs completed the web-based Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) using written case information detailing a child's typical functional mobility performance. Students then completed a course assignment to interpret test results, identify a complementary performance-based test, and develop intervention goals. Operational feasibility (time, technical, and economic needs), educational outcomes (PEDI-CAT scoring accuracy, assignment results), and student survey feedback were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes. Within a 3-semester hour course, 2 hours (13%) were devoted to this activity, which was completed using a free test application and the university-supported learning management system. Student-generated PEDI-CAT normative scores were 100% consistent with instructor scores, and 43 of 46 student pairs (94%) generated scaled scores within the 95% confidence interval for the instructor's PEDI-CAT-generated score. Assignment results (mean grade = 45.7/50) indicated comprehension of material evidenced by test result interpretation and development of a physical therapist (PT) Evaluation and intervention goals. Student feedback was positive for the use of case-based learning and web-based test administration experience as a learning activity. Discussion and Conclusion. Use of a written case and an online judgment-based assessment proved feasible and successful for exposing entry-level DPT students to test administration, item content, normative and standard scoring differences, and developing a PT Evaluation statement and intervention goals setting. During mandated hybrid instruction, this learning activity addressed the curriculum objectives related to PT examination in preparation for clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Experiential Learning Activity Using an Online Judgment-Based Pediatric Functional Measure During Hybrid Instruction With Doctor of Physical Therapy Students\",\"authors\":\"H. Dumas, Ann C Golub-Victor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jte.0000000000000214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose. Mandated remote instruction provided an opportunity to introduce Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students to online judgment-based measures used in clinical practice. In this method/model presentation, we report the operational feasibility, educational outcomes, and student satisfaction of a new learning activity providing entry-level DPT students with the experience to administer, score, and interpret the results of a pediatric, online, judgment-based functional assessment. Method/Model Description and Evaluation. Following introduction and demonstration, student pairs completed the web-based Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) using written case information detailing a child's typical functional mobility performance. Students then completed a course assignment to interpret test results, identify a complementary performance-based test, and develop intervention goals. Operational feasibility (time, technical, and economic needs), educational outcomes (PEDI-CAT scoring accuracy, assignment results), and student survey feedback were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes. Within a 3-semester hour course, 2 hours (13%) were devoted to this activity, which was completed using a free test application and the university-supported learning management system. Student-generated PEDI-CAT normative scores were 100% consistent with instructor scores, and 43 of 46 student pairs (94%) generated scaled scores within the 95% confidence interval for the instructor's PEDI-CAT-generated score. Assignment results (mean grade = 45.7/50) indicated comprehension of material evidenced by test result interpretation and development of a physical therapist (PT) Evaluation and intervention goals. Student feedback was positive for the use of case-based learning and web-based test administration experience as a learning activity. Discussion and Conclusion. Use of a written case and an online judgment-based assessment proved feasible and successful for exposing entry-level DPT students to test administration, item content, normative and standard scoring differences, and developing a PT Evaluation statement and intervention goals setting. During mandated hybrid instruction, this learning activity addressed the curriculum objectives related to PT examination in preparation for clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jte.0000000000000214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jte.0000000000000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的。强制远程教学提供了一个机会,向物理治疗博士(DPT)的学生介绍临床实践中使用的基于在线判断的措施。在该方法/模型演示中,我们报告了一项新的学习活动的操作可行性、教育成果和学生满意度,该活动为入门级DPT学生提供了管理、评分和解释儿科、在线、基于判断的功能评估结果的经验。方法/模型描述和评估。在介绍和演示之后,学生配对完成了基于网络的儿童残疾评估量表计算机自适应测试(PEDI-CAT),使用详细说明儿童典型功能性行动表现的书面案例信息。然后,学生们完成了一项课程作业,以解释测试结果,确定一项基于绩效的补充测试,并制定干预目标。对操作可行性(时间、技术和经济需求)、教育结果(PEDI-CAT评分准确性、作业结果)和学生调查反馈进行了回顾性评估。结果。在为期3个小时的课程中,有2个小时(13%)用于这项活动,该活动是通过免费测试申请和大学支持的学习管理系统完成的。学生生成的PEDI-CAT标准分数与教师分数100%一致,46对学生中有43对(94%)生成了在教师PEDI-CAT生成分数95%置信区间内的量表分数。作业结果(平均分=45.7/50)表明对测试结果的理解以及物理治疗师(PT)评估和干预目标的发展。学生对使用基于案例的学习和基于网络的考试管理经验作为学习活动的反馈是积极的。讨论和结论。事实证明,使用书面案例和基于在线判断的评估是可行和成功的,可以让初级DPT学生了解考试管理、项目内容、规范和标准评分差异,并制定PT评估声明和干预目标。在强制混合教学期间,这项学习活动解决了与PT考试相关的课程目标,为临床实践做准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Experiential Learning Activity Using an Online Judgment-Based Pediatric Functional Measure During Hybrid Instruction With Doctor of Physical Therapy Students
Background and Purpose. Mandated remote instruction provided an opportunity to introduce Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students to online judgment-based measures used in clinical practice. In this method/model presentation, we report the operational feasibility, educational outcomes, and student satisfaction of a new learning activity providing entry-level DPT students with the experience to administer, score, and interpret the results of a pediatric, online, judgment-based functional assessment. Method/Model Description and Evaluation. Following introduction and demonstration, student pairs completed the web-based Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) using written case information detailing a child's typical functional mobility performance. Students then completed a course assignment to interpret test results, identify a complementary performance-based test, and develop intervention goals. Operational feasibility (time, technical, and economic needs), educational outcomes (PEDI-CAT scoring accuracy, assignment results), and student survey feedback were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes. Within a 3-semester hour course, 2 hours (13%) were devoted to this activity, which was completed using a free test application and the university-supported learning management system. Student-generated PEDI-CAT normative scores were 100% consistent with instructor scores, and 43 of 46 student pairs (94%) generated scaled scores within the 95% confidence interval for the instructor's PEDI-CAT-generated score. Assignment results (mean grade = 45.7/50) indicated comprehension of material evidenced by test result interpretation and development of a physical therapist (PT) Evaluation and intervention goals. Student feedback was positive for the use of case-based learning and web-based test administration experience as a learning activity. Discussion and Conclusion. Use of a written case and an online judgment-based assessment proved feasible and successful for exposing entry-level DPT students to test administration, item content, normative and standard scoring differences, and developing a PT Evaluation statement and intervention goals setting. During mandated hybrid instruction, this learning activity addressed the curriculum objectives related to PT examination in preparation for clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信