劳动力资格过高:土著妇女和男子从高水平教育中平等受益吗?

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jungwee Park
{"title":"劳动力资格过高:土著妇女和男子从高水平教育中平等受益吗?","authors":"Jungwee Park","doi":"10.5663/APS.V9I2.29383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using data from the 2016 Census, this study examined the level of education–job mismatch (over-qualification, in particular) in the Canadian labour market among Indigenous women workers aged 25 to 64 who received post-secondary education. Their rate of over-qualification was compared with that of Indigenous men as well as non-Indigenous workers. In doing so, this study aimed to shed some light on the effect of post-secondary education on labour market outcomes by investigating whether Indigenous men and women benefit equally from their post-secondary education. Compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts and Indigenous men, Indigenous women workers with university-level education (bachelor’s degree or higher) were less likely to be over-qualified. Conversely, Indigenous women workers with post-secondary education lower than university level were more likely than non-Indigenous women and Indigenous men to be over-qualified. This pattern persisted after sociodemographic factors were controlled for. The results suggest that, among those with a post-secondary education, higher levels of education were especially advantageous to Indigenous women.","PeriodicalId":42043,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Over-qualification in the Workforce: Do Indigenous Women and Men Benefit Equally from High Levels of Education?\",\"authors\":\"Jungwee Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5663/APS.V9I2.29383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using data from the 2016 Census, this study examined the level of education–job mismatch (over-qualification, in particular) in the Canadian labour market among Indigenous women workers aged 25 to 64 who received post-secondary education. Their rate of over-qualification was compared with that of Indigenous men as well as non-Indigenous workers. In doing so, this study aimed to shed some light on the effect of post-secondary education on labour market outcomes by investigating whether Indigenous men and women benefit equally from their post-secondary education. Compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts and Indigenous men, Indigenous women workers with university-level education (bachelor’s degree or higher) were less likely to be over-qualified. Conversely, Indigenous women workers with post-secondary education lower than university level were more likely than non-Indigenous women and Indigenous men to be over-qualified. This pattern persisted after sociodemographic factors were controlled for. The results suggest that, among those with a post-secondary education, higher levels of education were especially advantageous to Indigenous women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aboriginal Policy Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aboriginal Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5663/APS.V9I2.29383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5663/APS.V9I2.29383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用2016年人口普查的数据,调查了25至64岁接受中学后教育的土著女工在加拿大劳动力市场上的教育水平与工作不匹配(尤其是学历过高)。他们的超资格率与土著男子和非土著工人的超资格比率进行了比较。为此,本研究旨在通过调查土著男女是否平等地从中学后教育中受益,来阐明中学后教育对劳动力市场结果的影响。与非土著同行和土著男性相比,受过大学教育(学士学位或更高学历)的土著女工不太可能资历过高。相反,中等教育程度低于大学水平的土著女工比非土著妇女和土著男子更有可能资格过高。在控制了社会人口因素后,这种模式仍然存在。研究结果表明,在受过中学后教育的人中,较高的教育水平对土著妇女特别有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Over-qualification in the Workforce: Do Indigenous Women and Men Benefit Equally from High Levels of Education?
Using data from the 2016 Census, this study examined the level of education–job mismatch (over-qualification, in particular) in the Canadian labour market among Indigenous women workers aged 25 to 64 who received post-secondary education. Their rate of over-qualification was compared with that of Indigenous men as well as non-Indigenous workers. In doing so, this study aimed to shed some light on the effect of post-secondary education on labour market outcomes by investigating whether Indigenous men and women benefit equally from their post-secondary education. Compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts and Indigenous men, Indigenous women workers with university-level education (bachelor’s degree or higher) were less likely to be over-qualified. Conversely, Indigenous women workers with post-secondary education lower than university level were more likely than non-Indigenous women and Indigenous men to be over-qualified. This pattern persisted after sociodemographic factors were controlled for. The results suggest that, among those with a post-secondary education, higher levels of education were especially advantageous to Indigenous women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aboriginal Policy Studies
Aboriginal Policy Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信