内皮祖细胞治疗骨折:大鼠股骨缺损模型的剂量反应研究

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
D. Ramnaraign, C. Godbout, K. Hali, Christian Hegner, Brent D. Bates, S. Desjardins, J. Peck, E. Schemitsch, A. Nauth
{"title":"内皮祖细胞治疗骨折:大鼠股骨缺损模型的剂量反应研究","authors":"D. Ramnaraign, C. Godbout, K. Hali, Christian Hegner, Brent D. Bates, S. Desjardins, J. Peck, E. Schemitsch, A. Nauth","doi":"10.1155/2023/8105599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy has been successfully used in orthopaedic preclinical models to heal bone defects. However, no previous studies have investigated the dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of different EPC doses on bone healing in a rat model to define an optimal dose. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. Rats were assigned to one of six groups (control, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M; n = 6), receiving 0, 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 4 × 106 EPCs, respectively, delivered into the defect on a gelatin scaffold. Radiographs were taken every two weeks until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using micro-computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Overall, the groups that received higher doses of EPCs (0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M) reached better outcomes. At 10 weeks, full radiographic union was observed in 67% of animals in the 0.5 M group, 83% of animals in the 1.0 M group, and 100% of the animals in the 2.0 M and 4.0 M groups, but none in the control and 0.1 M groups. The 2.0 M group also displayed the strongest biomechanical properties, which significantly improved relative to the control and 0.1 M groups. In summary, this study defined a dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing, with 2 × 106 EPCs being the optimal dose in this model. Our findings emphasize the importance of dosing considerations in the application of cell therapies aimed at tissue regeneration and will help guide future investigations and clinical translation of EPC therapy.","PeriodicalId":202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endothelial Progenitor Cell Therapy for Fracture Healing: A Dose-Response Study in a Rat Femoral Defect Model\",\"authors\":\"D. Ramnaraign, C. Godbout, K. Hali, Christian Hegner, Brent D. Bates, S. Desjardins, J. Peck, E. Schemitsch, A. Nauth\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8105599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy has been successfully used in orthopaedic preclinical models to heal bone defects. However, no previous studies have investigated the dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of different EPC doses on bone healing in a rat model to define an optimal dose. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. Rats were assigned to one of six groups (control, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M; n = 6), receiving 0, 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 4 × 106 EPCs, respectively, delivered into the defect on a gelatin scaffold. Radiographs were taken every two weeks until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using micro-computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Overall, the groups that received higher doses of EPCs (0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M) reached better outcomes. At 10 weeks, full radiographic union was observed in 67% of animals in the 0.5 M group, 83% of animals in the 1.0 M group, and 100% of the animals in the 2.0 M and 4.0 M groups, but none in the control and 0.1 M groups. The 2.0 M group also displayed the strongest biomechanical properties, which significantly improved relative to the control and 0.1 M groups. In summary, this study defined a dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing, with 2 × 106 EPCs being the optimal dose in this model. Our findings emphasize the importance of dosing considerations in the application of cell therapies aimed at tissue regeneration and will help guide future investigations and clinical translation of EPC therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8105599\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8105599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内皮祖细胞(EPC)疗法已成功应用于骨科临床前模型中,以治疗骨缺损。然而,以前没有研究研究EPC治疗与骨愈合之间的剂量-反应关系。本研究旨在评估不同EPC剂量对大鼠模型骨愈合的影响,以确定最佳剂量。在Fischer 344大鼠的右股骨中产生5毫米节段性缺损,随后用微型钢板和螺钉进行稳定。大鼠被分配到六组中的一组(对照组,0.1 M、 0.5 M、 1.0 M、 2.0 M、 和4.0 Mn = 6) ,正在接收0,1 × 105,5 × 105,1 × 106,2 × 106和4 × 106个EPC分别被输送到明胶支架上的缺陷中。每两周拍摄一次射线照片,直到动物被安乐死10 手术后数周。然后使用微型计算机断层扫描和生物力学测试对手术的股骨进行评估。总体而言,接受更高剂量EPC的组(0.5 M、 1.0 M、 2.0 M、 和4.0 M) 取得了更好的结果。在10 周,在0.5 M组,83%的动物在1.0 M组,以及2.0中100%的动物 M和4.0 M组,但对照组没有,0.1 M组。2.0 M组也表现出最强的生物力学特性,与对照组相比显著改善,0.1 M组。总之,本研究确定了EPC治疗和骨愈合之间的剂量-反应关系,其中2 × 106个EPC是该模型中的最佳剂量。我们的研究结果强调了在应用旨在组织再生的细胞疗法中剂量考虑的重要性,并将有助于指导EPC疗法的未来研究和临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endothelial Progenitor Cell Therapy for Fracture Healing: A Dose-Response Study in a Rat Femoral Defect Model
Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy has been successfully used in orthopaedic preclinical models to heal bone defects. However, no previous studies have investigated the dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of different EPC doses on bone healing in a rat model to define an optimal dose. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. Rats were assigned to one of six groups (control, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M; n = 6), receiving 0, 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 4 × 106 EPCs, respectively, delivered into the defect on a gelatin scaffold. Radiographs were taken every two weeks until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using micro-computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Overall, the groups that received higher doses of EPCs (0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M) reached better outcomes. At 10 weeks, full radiographic union was observed in 67% of animals in the 0.5 M group, 83% of animals in the 1.0 M group, and 100% of the animals in the 2.0 M and 4.0 M groups, but none in the control and 0.1 M groups. The 2.0 M group also displayed the strongest biomechanical properties, which significantly improved relative to the control and 0.1 M groups. In summary, this study defined a dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing, with 2 × 106 EPCs being the optimal dose in this model. Our findings emphasize the importance of dosing considerations in the application of cell therapies aimed at tissue regeneration and will help guide future investigations and clinical translation of EPC therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine publishes rapidly and rigorously peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, perspectives, and short communications on topics relevant to the development of therapeutic approaches which combine stem or progenitor cells, biomaterials and scaffolds, growth factors and other bioactive agents, and their respective constructs. All papers should deal with research that has a direct or potential impact on the development of novel clinical approaches for the regeneration or repair of tissues and organs. The journal is multidisciplinary, covering the combination of the principles of life sciences and engineering in efforts to advance medicine and clinical strategies. The journal focuses on the use of cells, materials, and biochemical/mechanical factors in the development of biological functional substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or organ function. The journal publishes research on any tissue or organ and covers all key aspects of the field, including the development of new biomaterials and processing of scaffolds; the use of different types of cells (mainly stem and progenitor cells) and their culture in specific bioreactors; studies in relevant animal models; and clinical trials in human patients performed under strict regulatory and ethical frameworks. Manuscripts describing the use of advanced methods for the characterization of engineered tissues are also of special interest to the journal readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信