D. Ramnaraign, C. Godbout, K. Hali, Christian Hegner, Brent D. Bates, S. Desjardins, J. Peck, E. Schemitsch, A. Nauth
{"title":"内皮祖细胞治疗骨折:大鼠股骨缺损模型的剂量反应研究","authors":"D. Ramnaraign, C. Godbout, K. Hali, Christian Hegner, Brent D. Bates, S. Desjardins, J. Peck, E. Schemitsch, A. Nauth","doi":"10.1155/2023/8105599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy has been successfully used in orthopaedic preclinical models to heal bone defects. However, no previous studies have investigated the dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of different EPC doses on bone healing in a rat model to define an optimal dose. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. Rats were assigned to one of six groups (control, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M; n = 6), receiving 0, 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 4 × 106 EPCs, respectively, delivered into the defect on a gelatin scaffold. Radiographs were taken every two weeks until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using micro-computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Overall, the groups that received higher doses of EPCs (0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M) reached better outcomes. At 10 weeks, full radiographic union was observed in 67% of animals in the 0.5 M group, 83% of animals in the 1.0 M group, and 100% of the animals in the 2.0 M and 4.0 M groups, but none in the control and 0.1 M groups. The 2.0 M group also displayed the strongest biomechanical properties, which significantly improved relative to the control and 0.1 M groups. In summary, this study defined a dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing, with 2 × 106 EPCs being the optimal dose in this model. Our findings emphasize the importance of dosing considerations in the application of cell therapies aimed at tissue regeneration and will help guide future investigations and clinical translation of EPC therapy.","PeriodicalId":202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endothelial Progenitor Cell Therapy for Fracture Healing: A Dose-Response Study in a Rat Femoral Defect Model\",\"authors\":\"D. Ramnaraign, C. Godbout, K. Hali, Christian Hegner, Brent D. Bates, S. Desjardins, J. Peck, E. Schemitsch, A. Nauth\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8105599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy has been successfully used in orthopaedic preclinical models to heal bone defects. However, no previous studies have investigated the dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of different EPC doses on bone healing in a rat model to define an optimal dose. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. Rats were assigned to one of six groups (control, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M; n = 6), receiving 0, 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 4 × 106 EPCs, respectively, delivered into the defect on a gelatin scaffold. Radiographs were taken every two weeks until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using micro-computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Overall, the groups that received higher doses of EPCs (0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M) reached better outcomes. At 10 weeks, full radiographic union was observed in 67% of animals in the 0.5 M group, 83% of animals in the 1.0 M group, and 100% of the animals in the 2.0 M and 4.0 M groups, but none in the control and 0.1 M groups. The 2.0 M group also displayed the strongest biomechanical properties, which significantly improved relative to the control and 0.1 M groups. In summary, this study defined a dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing, with 2 × 106 EPCs being the optimal dose in this model. Our findings emphasize the importance of dosing considerations in the application of cell therapies aimed at tissue regeneration and will help guide future investigations and clinical translation of EPC therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8105599\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8105599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endothelial Progenitor Cell Therapy for Fracture Healing: A Dose-Response Study in a Rat Femoral Defect Model
Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy has been successfully used in orthopaedic preclinical models to heal bone defects. However, no previous studies have investigated the dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of different EPC doses on bone healing in a rat model to define an optimal dose. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. Rats were assigned to one of six groups (control, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M; n = 6), receiving 0, 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 4 × 106 EPCs, respectively, delivered into the defect on a gelatin scaffold. Radiographs were taken every two weeks until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using micro-computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Overall, the groups that received higher doses of EPCs (0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M) reached better outcomes. At 10 weeks, full radiographic union was observed in 67% of animals in the 0.5 M group, 83% of animals in the 1.0 M group, and 100% of the animals in the 2.0 M and 4.0 M groups, but none in the control and 0.1 M groups. The 2.0 M group also displayed the strongest biomechanical properties, which significantly improved relative to the control and 0.1 M groups. In summary, this study defined a dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing, with 2 × 106 EPCs being the optimal dose in this model. Our findings emphasize the importance of dosing considerations in the application of cell therapies aimed at tissue regeneration and will help guide future investigations and clinical translation of EPC therapy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine publishes rapidly and rigorously peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, perspectives, and short communications on topics relevant to the development of therapeutic approaches which combine stem or progenitor cells, biomaterials and scaffolds, growth factors and other bioactive agents, and their respective constructs. All papers should deal with research that has a direct or potential impact on the development of novel clinical approaches for the regeneration or repair of tissues and organs.
The journal is multidisciplinary, covering the combination of the principles of life sciences and engineering in efforts to advance medicine and clinical strategies. The journal focuses on the use of cells, materials, and biochemical/mechanical factors in the development of biological functional substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or organ function. The journal publishes research on any tissue or organ and covers all key aspects of the field, including the development of new biomaterials and processing of scaffolds; the use of different types of cells (mainly stem and progenitor cells) and their culture in specific bioreactors; studies in relevant animal models; and clinical trials in human patients performed under strict regulatory and ethical frameworks. Manuscripts describing the use of advanced methods for the characterization of engineered tissues are also of special interest to the journal readership.