{"title":"随机图中潜在位置相等性的假设检验","authors":"Xinjie Du, M. Tang","doi":"10.3150/22-bej1581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the hypothesis testing problem that two vertices $i$ and $j$ of a generalized random dot product graph have the same latent positions, possibly up to scaling. Special cases of this hypothesis test include testing whether two vertices in a stochastic block model or degree-corrected stochastic block model graph have the same block membership vectors, or testing whether two vertices in a popularity adjusted block model have the same community assignment. We propose several test statistics based on the empirical Mahalanobis distances between the $i$th and $j$th rows of either the adjacency or the normalized Laplacian spectral embedding of the graph. We show that, under mild conditions, these test statistics have limiting chi-square distributions under both the null and local alternative hypothesis, and we derived explicit expressions for the non-centrality parameters under the local alternative. Using these limit results, we address the model selection problems including choosing between the standard stochastic block model and its degree-corrected variant, and choosing between the ER model and stochastic block model. The effectiveness of our proposed tests are illustrated via both simulation studies and real data applications.","PeriodicalId":55387,"journal":{"name":"Bernoulli","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypothesis testing for equality of latent positions in random graphs\",\"authors\":\"Xinjie Du, M. Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.3150/22-bej1581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the hypothesis testing problem that two vertices $i$ and $j$ of a generalized random dot product graph have the same latent positions, possibly up to scaling. Special cases of this hypothesis test include testing whether two vertices in a stochastic block model or degree-corrected stochastic block model graph have the same block membership vectors, or testing whether two vertices in a popularity adjusted block model have the same community assignment. We propose several test statistics based on the empirical Mahalanobis distances between the $i$th and $j$th rows of either the adjacency or the normalized Laplacian spectral embedding of the graph. We show that, under mild conditions, these test statistics have limiting chi-square distributions under both the null and local alternative hypothesis, and we derived explicit expressions for the non-centrality parameters under the local alternative. Using these limit results, we address the model selection problems including choosing between the standard stochastic block model and its degree-corrected variant, and choosing between the ER model and stochastic block model. The effectiveness of our proposed tests are illustrated via both simulation studies and real data applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bernoulli\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bernoulli\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3150/22-bej1581\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bernoulli","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3150/22-bej1581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hypothesis testing for equality of latent positions in random graphs
We consider the hypothesis testing problem that two vertices $i$ and $j$ of a generalized random dot product graph have the same latent positions, possibly up to scaling. Special cases of this hypothesis test include testing whether two vertices in a stochastic block model or degree-corrected stochastic block model graph have the same block membership vectors, or testing whether two vertices in a popularity adjusted block model have the same community assignment. We propose several test statistics based on the empirical Mahalanobis distances between the $i$th and $j$th rows of either the adjacency or the normalized Laplacian spectral embedding of the graph. We show that, under mild conditions, these test statistics have limiting chi-square distributions under both the null and local alternative hypothesis, and we derived explicit expressions for the non-centrality parameters under the local alternative. Using these limit results, we address the model selection problems including choosing between the standard stochastic block model and its degree-corrected variant, and choosing between the ER model and stochastic block model. The effectiveness of our proposed tests are illustrated via both simulation studies and real data applications.
期刊介绍:
BERNOULLI is the journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability, issued four times per year. The journal provides a comprehensive account of important developments in the fields of statistics and probability, offering an international forum for both theoretical and applied work.
BERNOULLI will publish:
Papers containing original and significant research contributions: with background, mathematical derivation and discussion of the results in suitable detail and, where appropriate, with discussion of interesting applications in relation to the methodology proposed.
Papers of the following two types will also be considered for publication, provided they are judged to enhance the dissemination of research:
Review papers which provide an integrated critical survey of some area of probability and statistics and discuss important recent developments.
Scholarly written papers on some historical significant aspect of statistics and probability.