关于西梅里亚大陆的性质

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A.M. Celâl Şengör , Demir Altıner , Cengiz Zabcı , Gürsel Sunal , Nalan Lom , Eşref Aylan , Tayfun Öner
{"title":"关于西梅里亚大陆的性质","authors":"A.M. Celâl Şengör ,&nbsp;Demir Altıner ,&nbsp;Cengiz Zabcı ,&nbsp;Gürsel Sunal ,&nbsp;Nalan Lom ,&nbsp;Eşref Aylan ,&nbsp;Tayfun Öner","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The Cimmerian Continent is the narrow continental strip that rifted from the northeastern Gondwana-Land margin mostly during the Permian<span> between the present-day Balkan regions and Indonesia and collided with the Laurasian margin sometime between the </span></span>latest Triassic<span> and the late Jurassic<span>, in places possibly even in the earliest Cretaceous<span>. In contrast to the initial definition and most subsequent models, the Cimmerian Continent did not leave Gondwana-Land in one piece, but such submarine platforms as the Sakarya, Menderes-Taurus and Kırşehir in Turkey, and what is herein called the Greater Lhasa from Afghanistan to Myanmar began separating both from Gondwana-Land and from the rest of the Cimmerian Continent at about the same time during the Permian. By contrast, the northern part of the Cimmerian Continent remained as a large, single-piece, island arc-type ribbon continent from Turkey to Malaysia comprising the units of the Rhodope-Pontide Fragment in Turkey, most of Transcaucasia and Iran, the Farah, western Qiangtang, Bao-Shan and the Shan States blocks and western Thailand and Malaysia throughout its independent history. This coherent ‘ribbon continent’, perhaps the largest documented in earth history, was almost wholly an ensialic arc only in places having generated Mariana-type ensimatic offspring. Thus, the northern margin of the Cimmerian Continent was of Pacific-type and not Atlantic-type as claimed by many authors in the literature. Naming its various parts individually helps description but should not be allowed to mislead interpretations in terms of individual, so-called ‘terranes’, as often happens. It seems that many of the oceanic basins that opened within and behind the Cimmerian Continent, including the Neo-Tethys, were back-arc basins and the Cimmerian continent had a serpentine motion as it traversed the Tethyan realm. It is therefore impossible to reconstruct synthetic isochrons to track the northerly migration of the large ribbon continent (except for purposes of simple visualisation of the journey of the Cimmerian Continent across the Tethyan realm). The Cimmerian Continent also had a complex internal tectonics, involving much along the strike-slip faulting, presumed to have been controlled by the age, subduction angle, rate of subduction, and the topography of the floor of the Palaeo-Tethys.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 104520"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the nature of the Cimmerian Continent\",\"authors\":\"A.M. Celâl Şengör ,&nbsp;Demir Altıner ,&nbsp;Cengiz Zabcı ,&nbsp;Gürsel Sunal ,&nbsp;Nalan Lom ,&nbsp;Eşref Aylan ,&nbsp;Tayfun Öner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The Cimmerian Continent is the narrow continental strip that rifted from the northeastern Gondwana-Land margin mostly during the Permian<span> between the present-day Balkan regions and Indonesia and collided with the Laurasian margin sometime between the </span></span>latest Triassic<span> and the late Jurassic<span>, in places possibly even in the earliest Cretaceous<span>. In contrast to the initial definition and most subsequent models, the Cimmerian Continent did not leave Gondwana-Land in one piece, but such submarine platforms as the Sakarya, Menderes-Taurus and Kırşehir in Turkey, and what is herein called the Greater Lhasa from Afghanistan to Myanmar began separating both from Gondwana-Land and from the rest of the Cimmerian Continent at about the same time during the Permian. By contrast, the northern part of the Cimmerian Continent remained as a large, single-piece, island arc-type ribbon continent from Turkey to Malaysia comprising the units of the Rhodope-Pontide Fragment in Turkey, most of Transcaucasia and Iran, the Farah, western Qiangtang, Bao-Shan and the Shan States blocks and western Thailand and Malaysia throughout its independent history. This coherent ‘ribbon continent’, perhaps the largest documented in earth history, was almost wholly an ensialic arc only in places having generated Mariana-type ensimatic offspring. Thus, the northern margin of the Cimmerian Continent was of Pacific-type and not Atlantic-type as claimed by many authors in the literature. Naming its various parts individually helps description but should not be allowed to mislead interpretations in terms of individual, so-called ‘terranes’, as often happens. It seems that many of the oceanic basins that opened within and behind the Cimmerian Continent, including the Neo-Tethys, were back-arc basins and the Cimmerian continent had a serpentine motion as it traversed the Tethyan realm. It is therefore impossible to reconstruct synthetic isochrons to track the northerly migration of the large ribbon continent (except for purposes of simple visualisation of the journey of the Cimmerian Continent across the Tethyan realm). The Cimmerian Continent also had a complex internal tectonics, involving much along the strike-slip faulting, presumed to have been controlled by the age, subduction angle, rate of subduction, and the topography of the floor of the Palaeo-Tethys.</span></span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001282522300209X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001282522300209X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

西默里亚大陆是一条狭窄的大陆带,主要是在今天的巴尔干地区和印度尼西亚之间的二叠纪时期从冈瓦纳大陆边缘的东北部断裂,并在三叠纪晚期和侏罗纪晚期之间的某个时候与劳拉斯边缘碰撞,有些地方甚至可能在白垩纪早期。与最初的定义和后来的大多数模型相反,西梅里亚大陆并没有完整地离开冈瓦纳大陆,而是像萨卡莉亚、门德莱斯-托罗斯和土耳其的Kırşehir这样的海底平台,以及这里所说的从阿富汗到缅甸的大拉萨,大约在二叠纪的同一时间开始从冈瓦纳大陆和西梅里亚大陆的其他部分分离。相比之下,西米里亚大陆的北部在其独立的历史中一直是一个从土耳其到马来西亚的大的、单片的、岛弧型的带状大陆,包括土耳其的罗多普-庞泰碎片、外高加索和伊朗的大部分地区、法拉、羌塘西部、宝山和掸邦地块以及泰国和马来西亚西部。这个连贯的“带状大陆”,也许是地球历史上有记载的最大的大陆,几乎完全是一个隐热弧,只有在产生了马里亚纳型隐热后代的地方。因此,西梅里亚大陆的北缘是太平洋型的,而不是许多作者在文献中所说的大西洋型的。单独命名它的各个部分有助于描述,但不应该被允许以个人的方式误导解释,所谓的“地形”,这经常发生。似乎许多在西梅里亚大陆内部和背后打开的海洋盆地,包括新特提斯,都是弧后盆地,西梅里亚大陆在穿越特提斯王国时具有蛇形运动。因此,重建合成等时线来追踪大带状大陆的北移是不可能的(除了简单地可视化西梅里亚大陆穿越特提斯王国的旅程)。西梅里亚大陆也有一个复杂的内部构造,包括沿走滑断层,被认为是由时代、俯冲角度、俯冲速度和古特提斯板块的地形控制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the nature of the Cimmerian Continent

The Cimmerian Continent is the narrow continental strip that rifted from the northeastern Gondwana-Land margin mostly during the Permian between the present-day Balkan regions and Indonesia and collided with the Laurasian margin sometime between the latest Triassic and the late Jurassic, in places possibly even in the earliest Cretaceous. In contrast to the initial definition and most subsequent models, the Cimmerian Continent did not leave Gondwana-Land in one piece, but such submarine platforms as the Sakarya, Menderes-Taurus and Kırşehir in Turkey, and what is herein called the Greater Lhasa from Afghanistan to Myanmar began separating both from Gondwana-Land and from the rest of the Cimmerian Continent at about the same time during the Permian. By contrast, the northern part of the Cimmerian Continent remained as a large, single-piece, island arc-type ribbon continent from Turkey to Malaysia comprising the units of the Rhodope-Pontide Fragment in Turkey, most of Transcaucasia and Iran, the Farah, western Qiangtang, Bao-Shan and the Shan States blocks and western Thailand and Malaysia throughout its independent history. This coherent ‘ribbon continent’, perhaps the largest documented in earth history, was almost wholly an ensialic arc only in places having generated Mariana-type ensimatic offspring. Thus, the northern margin of the Cimmerian Continent was of Pacific-type and not Atlantic-type as claimed by many authors in the literature. Naming its various parts individually helps description but should not be allowed to mislead interpretations in terms of individual, so-called ‘terranes’, as often happens. It seems that many of the oceanic basins that opened within and behind the Cimmerian Continent, including the Neo-Tethys, were back-arc basins and the Cimmerian continent had a serpentine motion as it traversed the Tethyan realm. It is therefore impossible to reconstruct synthetic isochrons to track the northerly migration of the large ribbon continent (except for purposes of simple visualisation of the journey of the Cimmerian Continent across the Tethyan realm). The Cimmerian Continent also had a complex internal tectonics, involving much along the strike-slip faulting, presumed to have been controlled by the age, subduction angle, rate of subduction, and the topography of the floor of the Palaeo-Tethys.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信