英格兰的环境和健康不平等(2000-2015)

IF 3.3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Aina Roca-Barceló, M. Cesare, D. Fecht
{"title":"英格兰的环境和健康不平等(2000-2015)","authors":"Aina Roca-Barceló, M. Cesare, D. Fecht","doi":"10.1097/01.ee9.0000609688.41583.c8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Environmental factors, including deprivation, account for 23% of global deaths. Deprivation is believed to magnify differences in the exposure levels (exposure differential), and in the population’s susceptibility to develop health outcomes given an exposure (susceptibility differential). We aimed to examine exposure and susceptibility differentials to various environmental exposures, such as PM2.5 and NO2, across England (2000-2015). \n \nMethods: Population-weighted mean concentrations of the studied exposures were assigned to 2011 Lower Super Output Area, LSOA (1,000-3,000 population) and each LSOA was classified in deciles of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), 2015. To assess the exposure differential component, exposure gradients across IMD deciles were investigated. To evaluate the differential susceptibility component, we used sex- and age-specific all-cause mortality. Age-standardized death rates were investigated by exposure levels across IMD deciles. Finally, we regressed mortality rates to exposure levels adjusting for main confounders and stratifying by deprivation decile. \n \nResults: Mean concentration of PM2.5 and NO2 were 14.01µg/m3 and 29.13µg/m3, respectively. Preliminary results show a positive gradient of concentration by IMD decile, suggesting an exposure differential by deprivation. Between 2000 and 2015, there were an average of 488,511 deaths per annum. Of these, ~11% and ~8% occurred in the top most and least deprived IMD deciles, respectively. After fitting basic regression models, our preliminary results show no difference in the effect of PM2.5 and NO2 on all-cause mortality risk by deprivation decile. More sophisticated statistical approaches are currently being explored in order to account for spatial dependency and other confounders that could be creating noise in our data. \n \nConclusion: This national study provides up to date evidence on the exposure differential by area deprivation in relation to environmental exposures (e.g. PM2.5 and NO2) across England. It also explores the role of deprivation in the mortality effects of these environmental exposures.","PeriodicalId":11713,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.ee9.0000609688.41583.c8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental and health inequalities in England (2000-2015)\",\"authors\":\"Aina Roca-Barceló, M. Cesare, D. Fecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.ee9.0000609688.41583.c8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Environmental factors, including deprivation, account for 23% of global deaths. Deprivation is believed to magnify differences in the exposure levels (exposure differential), and in the population’s susceptibility to develop health outcomes given an exposure (susceptibility differential). We aimed to examine exposure and susceptibility differentials to various environmental exposures, such as PM2.5 and NO2, across England (2000-2015). \\n \\nMethods: Population-weighted mean concentrations of the studied exposures were assigned to 2011 Lower Super Output Area, LSOA (1,000-3,000 population) and each LSOA was classified in deciles of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), 2015. To assess the exposure differential component, exposure gradients across IMD deciles were investigated. To evaluate the differential susceptibility component, we used sex- and age-specific all-cause mortality. Age-standardized death rates were investigated by exposure levels across IMD deciles. Finally, we regressed mortality rates to exposure levels adjusting for main confounders and stratifying by deprivation decile. \\n \\nResults: Mean concentration of PM2.5 and NO2 were 14.01µg/m3 and 29.13µg/m3, respectively. Preliminary results show a positive gradient of concentration by IMD decile, suggesting an exposure differential by deprivation. Between 2000 and 2015, there were an average of 488,511 deaths per annum. Of these, ~11% and ~8% occurred in the top most and least deprived IMD deciles, respectively. After fitting basic regression models, our preliminary results show no difference in the effect of PM2.5 and NO2 on all-cause mortality risk by deprivation decile. More sophisticated statistical approaches are currently being explored in order to account for spatial dependency and other confounders that could be creating noise in our data. \\n \\nConclusion: This national study provides up to date evidence on the exposure differential by area deprivation in relation to environmental exposures (e.g. PM2.5 and NO2) across England. It also explores the role of deprivation in the mortality effects of these environmental exposures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.ee9.0000609688.41583.c8\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ee9.0000609688.41583.c8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ee9.0000609688.41583.c8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:包括贫困在内的环境因素占全球死亡人数的23%。剥夺被认为会放大暴露水平(暴露差异)和人群在暴露后产生健康结果的易感性(易感性差异)的差异。我们旨在研究英格兰各地(2000-2015年)对PM2.5和NO2等各种环境暴露的暴露和易感性差异。方法:研究暴露的人群加权平均浓度被分配到2011年低超输出区,LSOA(1000-3000人群),每个LSOA被划分为2015年多重剥夺指数(IMD)的十分位数。为了评估暴露差异成分,研究了IMD十分位数的暴露梯度。为了评估差异易感性成分,我们使用了性别和年龄特异性全因死亡率。年龄标准化死亡率通过IMD十分位数的暴露水平进行调查。最后,我们将死亡率回归到暴露水平,对主要混杂因素进行调整,并按剥夺十分位数进行分层。结果:PM2.5和NO2的平均浓度分别为14.01µg/m3和29.13µg/m3。初步结果显示,IMD十分位数的浓度呈正梯度,表明剥夺对暴露的影响存在差异。2000年至2015年间,平均每年有488851人死亡。其中,约11%和约8%分别发生在最贫困和最贫困的IMD十分位数。在拟合基本回归模型后,我们的初步结果显示,PM2.5和NO2对剥夺十分位数全因死亡率的影响没有差异。目前正在探索更复杂的统计方法,以解释可能在我们的数据中产生噪声的空间依赖性和其他混杂因素。结论:这项全国性研究提供了最新的证据,证明英格兰各地因区域剥夺而产生的暴露差异与环境暴露(如PM2.5和NO2)有关。它还探讨了剥夺在这些环境暴露的死亡率影响中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental and health inequalities in England (2000-2015)
Background: Environmental factors, including deprivation, account for 23% of global deaths. Deprivation is believed to magnify differences in the exposure levels (exposure differential), and in the population’s susceptibility to develop health outcomes given an exposure (susceptibility differential). We aimed to examine exposure and susceptibility differentials to various environmental exposures, such as PM2.5 and NO2, across England (2000-2015). Methods: Population-weighted mean concentrations of the studied exposures were assigned to 2011 Lower Super Output Area, LSOA (1,000-3,000 population) and each LSOA was classified in deciles of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), 2015. To assess the exposure differential component, exposure gradients across IMD deciles were investigated. To evaluate the differential susceptibility component, we used sex- and age-specific all-cause mortality. Age-standardized death rates were investigated by exposure levels across IMD deciles. Finally, we regressed mortality rates to exposure levels adjusting for main confounders and stratifying by deprivation decile. Results: Mean concentration of PM2.5 and NO2 were 14.01µg/m3 and 29.13µg/m3, respectively. Preliminary results show a positive gradient of concentration by IMD decile, suggesting an exposure differential by deprivation. Between 2000 and 2015, there were an average of 488,511 deaths per annum. Of these, ~11% and ~8% occurred in the top most and least deprived IMD deciles, respectively. After fitting basic regression models, our preliminary results show no difference in the effect of PM2.5 and NO2 on all-cause mortality risk by deprivation decile. More sophisticated statistical approaches are currently being explored in order to account for spatial dependency and other confounders that could be creating noise in our data. Conclusion: This national study provides up to date evidence on the exposure differential by area deprivation in relation to environmental exposures (e.g. PM2.5 and NO2) across England. It also explores the role of deprivation in the mortality effects of these environmental exposures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信