导论:国际组织法的争议基础:法律理论的重新定位

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

International Organizations Law Review Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1163/15723747-20010001

Lorenzo Gasbarri

{"title":"导论:国际组织法的争议基础:法律理论的重新定位","authors":"Lorenzo Gasbarri","doi":"10.1163/15723747-20010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, Jan Klabbers and Guy Fiti Sinclair opened a Symposium of the European Journal of International Law by claiming that “international organizations law is one of those fields of international law where theorization by lawyers has been kept to a minimum”.1 Judging by the reactions of legal academics, especially early career researchers, their call was not left unanswered. In just two years, international organizations have been the object of several interdisciplinary studies adopting different perspectives and tools to discuss the uses of legal expertise. Socio-legal, historical, and ethnographic studies are redefining the ways in which to look at international organizations.2 International organizations appear to be the ideal arena in which to perform archival research, interviews, textual analysis, or have a direct working experience to study the ‘law in action’ under intriguing and enriching perspectives. By contrast, it appears that doctrinal research on the law of international organizations is not keeping the pace with this renewed interest and is getting marginalized by both academia and practitioners. For the former, it is","PeriodicalId":42966,"journal":{"name":"International Organizations Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Contested Fundamentals of the Law of International Organizations: Repositioning Legal Theory\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Gasbarri\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15723747-20010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2020, Jan Klabbers and Guy Fiti Sinclair opened a Symposium of the European Journal of International Law by claiming that “international organizations law is one of those fields of international law where theorization by lawyers has been kept to a minimum”.1 Judging by the reactions of legal academics, especially early career researchers, their call was not left unanswered. In just two years, international organizations have been the object of several interdisciplinary studies adopting different perspectives and tools to discuss the uses of legal expertise. Socio-legal, historical, and ethnographic studies are redefining the ways in which to look at international organizations.2 International organizations appear to be the ideal arena in which to perform archival research, interviews, textual analysis, or have a direct working experience to study the ‘law in action’ under intriguing and enriching perspectives. By contrast, it appears that doctrinal research on the law of international organizations is not keeping the pace with this renewed interest and is getting marginalized by both academia and practitioners. For the former, it is\",\"PeriodicalId\":42966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-20010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Organizations Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-20010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年，Jan Klabbers和Guy Fiti Sinclair在《欧洲国际法杂志》(European Journal of International Law)的研讨会上提出，“国际组织法是国际法中律师理论化被保持在最低限度的领域之一”从法律学者的反应来看，尤其是早期职业研究人员，他们的呼吁并没有被置之不理。在短短两年内，国际组织已成为若干跨学科研究的对象，采用不同的观点和工具来讨论法律专门知识的使用。社会法律、历史和民族志研究正在重新定义看待国际组织的方式国际组织似乎是进行档案研究、访谈、文本分析或在有趣和丰富的视角下研究“行动中的法律”的直接工作经验的理想场所。相比之下，关于国际组织法的理论研究似乎没有跟上这种新的兴趣的步伐，并被学术界和实践者边缘化。对于前者来说，确实如此

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Introduction: Contested Fundamentals of the Law of International Organizations: Repositioning Legal Theory

In 2020, Jan Klabbers and Guy Fiti Sinclair opened a Symposium of the European Journal of International Law by claiming that “international organizations law is one of those fields of international law where theorization by lawyers has been kept to a minimum”.1 Judging by the reactions of legal academics, especially early career researchers, their call was not left unanswered. In just two years, international organizations have been the object of several interdisciplinary studies adopting different perspectives and tools to discuss the uses of legal expertise. Socio-legal, historical, and ethnographic studies are redefining the ways in which to look at international organizations.2 International organizations appear to be the ideal arena in which to perform archival research, interviews, textual analysis, or have a direct working experience to study the ‘law in action’ under intriguing and enriching perspectives. By contrast, it appears that doctrinal research on the law of international organizations is not keeping the pace with this renewed interest and is getting marginalized by both academia and practitioners. For the former, it is

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Organizations Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： After the Second World War in particular, the law of international organizations developed as a discipline within public international law. Separate, but not separable. The International Organizations Law Review purports to function as a discussion forum for academics and practitioners active in the field of the law of international organizations. It is based on two pillars; one is based in the world of scholarship, the other in the world of practice. In the first dimension, the Journal focuses on general developments in international institutional law.