如何驯服想象的边界:移民和难民教育中的批判性越界

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jamila Lyiscott, Keisha L. Green, Justin A. Coles, Esther O. Ohito
{"title":"如何驯服想象的边界:移民和难民教育中的批判性越界","authors":"Jamila Lyiscott, Keisha L. Green, Justin A. Coles, Esther O. Ohito","doi":"10.1080/10665684.2022.2080663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are immigrants. And the descendants of immigrants. And the descendants of the descendants of the descendants of those unwillingly dragged across waters and borders. The offspring of attempted erasure. We inhabit lands where shifting boundaries breed border consciousness and border tongues (Anzaldúa, 1987). We are the transgression. We are the hemorrhaging and the scab and the healing all at once. We be untamed crossroads, a confluence of the imaginary borders that sought to bind us, but birthed us instead. Periodt. In 2017, South Korean artist, Kimsooja, showcased an installation entitled, To Breathe – Zone of Nowhere, depicting the intermixed symbols of 30 different national flags layered onto each other to the point that they are not individually distinguishable (Kimsooja, n.d.). However, this cross-pollination of nationhood symbols is not working to convey the corny melting-pot message that we are used to in the United States—one that purports inclusion by luring everyone into a boiling cauldron of whiteness. Instead, it works to challenge the illusory intent of state sovereignty and nationalism that lay the foundation for exclusionary and anti-immigrant rhetoric. Over the last three decades, increasing mainstream anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States has been paired with educational legislation that underscores America’s ongoing disregard and contempt for immigrants and refugees of color in America: English only laws that seek to sever students from the languages of their people under the assertion that “immigrant parents are eager to have their children acquire a good knowledge of English, thereby allowing them to fully participate in the American Dream of economic and social advancement” (Arizona Secretary of State, 2000); laws banning Ethnic Studies to prohibit any form of education that “advocates ethnic solidarity” (House of Representatives, 2010); and laws attacking “Critical Race Theory” and banning books centered on the ethno-racial, linguistic, cultural, and historical identities of people of color (Alfonseca, 2022).","PeriodicalId":47334,"journal":{"name":"Equity & Excellence in Education","volume":"55 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Tame an Imaginary Border: Critical Transgression in Immigrant and Refugee Education\",\"authors\":\"Jamila Lyiscott, Keisha L. Green, Justin A. Coles, Esther O. Ohito\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10665684.2022.2080663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are immigrants. And the descendants of immigrants. And the descendants of the descendants of the descendants of those unwillingly dragged across waters and borders. The offspring of attempted erasure. We inhabit lands where shifting boundaries breed border consciousness and border tongues (Anzaldúa, 1987). We are the transgression. We are the hemorrhaging and the scab and the healing all at once. We be untamed crossroads, a confluence of the imaginary borders that sought to bind us, but birthed us instead. Periodt. In 2017, South Korean artist, Kimsooja, showcased an installation entitled, To Breathe – Zone of Nowhere, depicting the intermixed symbols of 30 different national flags layered onto each other to the point that they are not individually distinguishable (Kimsooja, n.d.). However, this cross-pollination of nationhood symbols is not working to convey the corny melting-pot message that we are used to in the United States—one that purports inclusion by luring everyone into a boiling cauldron of whiteness. Instead, it works to challenge the illusory intent of state sovereignty and nationalism that lay the foundation for exclusionary and anti-immigrant rhetoric. Over the last three decades, increasing mainstream anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States has been paired with educational legislation that underscores America’s ongoing disregard and contempt for immigrants and refugees of color in America: English only laws that seek to sever students from the languages of their people under the assertion that “immigrant parents are eager to have their children acquire a good knowledge of English, thereby allowing them to fully participate in the American Dream of economic and social advancement” (Arizona Secretary of State, 2000); laws banning Ethnic Studies to prohibit any form of education that “advocates ethnic solidarity” (House of Representatives, 2010); and laws attacking “Critical Race Theory” and banning books centered on the ethno-racial, linguistic, cultural, and historical identities of people of color (Alfonseca, 2022).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2080663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equity & Excellence in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2080663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们是移民。还有移民的后代。还有那些不情愿被拖过水域和边界的人的后代的后代的后代。企图擦除的产物我们居住的地方,不断变化的边界孕育着边界意识和边界语言(Anzaldúa, 1987)。我们就是违法者。我们同时负责出血和结痂和愈合。我们在一个未被驯服的十字路口,一个想象边界的交汇处,它试图将我们捆绑在一起,但却诞生了我们。Periodt。2017年,韩国艺术家Kimsooja展示了一件名为“呼吸-无处之区”的装置作品,描绘了30个不同国旗的混合符号,相互叠加,以至于它们无法单独区分(Kimsooja, n.d)。然而,这种国家象征的交叉授粉并不能传达我们在美国习惯的那种陈词滥调的大熔炉信息——一种通过引诱每个人进入一个沸腾的白人大锅来宣称包容的信息。相反,它致力于挑战为排他性和反移民言论奠定基础的国家主权和民族主义的虚幻意图。在过去的三十年里,美国主流反移民情绪的增加与教育立法相结合,这些立法强调了美国对美国有色人种移民和难民的持续漠视和蔑视:以“移民父母渴望让他们的孩子掌握良好的英语知识,从而使他们能够充分参与经济和社会进步的美国梦”为由,试图将学生与本民族语言隔离开来的法律(亚利桑那州国务卿,2000年);禁止民族研究的法律,禁止任何形式的“提倡民族团结”的教育(众议院,2010年);法律攻击“批判种族理论”,禁止以有色人种的民族、语言、文化和历史身份为中心的书籍(Alfonseca, 2022)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Tame an Imaginary Border: Critical Transgression in Immigrant and Refugee Education
We are immigrants. And the descendants of immigrants. And the descendants of the descendants of the descendants of those unwillingly dragged across waters and borders. The offspring of attempted erasure. We inhabit lands where shifting boundaries breed border consciousness and border tongues (Anzaldúa, 1987). We are the transgression. We are the hemorrhaging and the scab and the healing all at once. We be untamed crossroads, a confluence of the imaginary borders that sought to bind us, but birthed us instead. Periodt. In 2017, South Korean artist, Kimsooja, showcased an installation entitled, To Breathe – Zone of Nowhere, depicting the intermixed symbols of 30 different national flags layered onto each other to the point that they are not individually distinguishable (Kimsooja, n.d.). However, this cross-pollination of nationhood symbols is not working to convey the corny melting-pot message that we are used to in the United States—one that purports inclusion by luring everyone into a boiling cauldron of whiteness. Instead, it works to challenge the illusory intent of state sovereignty and nationalism that lay the foundation for exclusionary and anti-immigrant rhetoric. Over the last three decades, increasing mainstream anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States has been paired with educational legislation that underscores America’s ongoing disregard and contempt for immigrants and refugees of color in America: English only laws that seek to sever students from the languages of their people under the assertion that “immigrant parents are eager to have their children acquire a good knowledge of English, thereby allowing them to fully participate in the American Dream of economic and social advancement” (Arizona Secretary of State, 2000); laws banning Ethnic Studies to prohibit any form of education that “advocates ethnic solidarity” (House of Representatives, 2010); and laws attacking “Critical Race Theory” and banning books centered on the ethno-racial, linguistic, cultural, and historical identities of people of color (Alfonseca, 2022).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Equity & Excellence in Education
Equity & Excellence in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
23.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Equity & Excellence in Education publishes articles based on scholarly research utilizing qualitative or quantitative methods, as well as essays that describe and assess practical efforts to achieve educational equity and are contextualized within an appropriate literature review. We consider manuscripts on a range of topics related to equity, equality and social justice in K-12 or postsecondary schooling, and that focus upon social justice issues in school systems, individual schools, classrooms, and/or the social justice factors that contribute to inequality in learning for students from diverse social group backgrounds. There have been and will continue to be many social justice efforts to transform educational systems as well as interpersonal interactions at all levels of schooling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信