编辑

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tony Eaude
{"title":"编辑","authors":"Tony Eaude","doi":"10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As books review editor, as well as a reader of, and contributor to, the International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, I gain a particular perspective on the themes which are – and are not – highlighted in relation to children’s spirituality; and how these have changed over recent years. This editorial offers the opportunity to consider the current state of the discourse on children’s spirituality and to suggest some directions which this and future research might usefully take, though inevitably this reflects my own interests and prejudices to some extent. It also provides me with the chance to thank those who have reviewed books and to encourage other people to recommend suitable books and/or offer to review them – please contact me if so. The majority of books put forward are, unsurprisingly, suggested by publishers, with authors sometimes asking for their books to be reviewed and unsolicited reviews received occasionally. Publishers tend to suggest books which are either academic and fairly denseor deal in relatively simple andmore accessible termswith a particular issue such as ADHD, illness or bereavement. The more academic books, with some notable exceptions, are usually related to religion and/or religious education, and in some cases chaplaincy, but often refer only loosely to spirituality. The less academic ones frequently make only a somewhat cursory mention of spirituality, except those which discuss practical programmes, such as Godly Play, or approaches such as mindfulness. There have been more books recently which discuss children’s spirituality in relation to holistic education. Books are published from time to timeonaspects of children’s lives such as dreams and imaginary friends which are necessarily dependent on children’s own perceptions and descriptions. Most of the books which discuss children of a specific age address the early years or adolescence, rather than the years in between. Only rarely arewebsites identified for possible review. Occasionally, books are recommended, or even sent, which make no mention of spirituality or children. Unsurprisingly, these are not considered for review! What are we to make of this? First, the perception by publishers of what the IJCS will be interested in, and therefore presumably how spirituality is perceived more broadly, is that it relates mainly to members of faith communities and educators, especially those working in religious education. Maybe, the type of books recommended reflects the long-standing difficulty of defining what is meant by spirituality. I suspect we will always face this and should see spirituality as a very loosely defined concept, drawing on a Wittgensteinian view of family INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDREN’S SPIRITUALITY 2019, VOL. 24, NO. 3, 225–227 https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Tony Eaude\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As books review editor, as well as a reader of, and contributor to, the International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, I gain a particular perspective on the themes which are – and are not – highlighted in relation to children’s spirituality; and how these have changed over recent years. This editorial offers the opportunity to consider the current state of the discourse on children’s spirituality and to suggest some directions which this and future research might usefully take, though inevitably this reflects my own interests and prejudices to some extent. It also provides me with the chance to thank those who have reviewed books and to encourage other people to recommend suitable books and/or offer to review them – please contact me if so. The majority of books put forward are, unsurprisingly, suggested by publishers, with authors sometimes asking for their books to be reviewed and unsolicited reviews received occasionally. Publishers tend to suggest books which are either academic and fairly denseor deal in relatively simple andmore accessible termswith a particular issue such as ADHD, illness or bereavement. The more academic books, with some notable exceptions, are usually related to religion and/or religious education, and in some cases chaplaincy, but often refer only loosely to spirituality. The less academic ones frequently make only a somewhat cursory mention of spirituality, except those which discuss practical programmes, such as Godly Play, or approaches such as mindfulness. There have been more books recently which discuss children’s spirituality in relation to holistic education. Books are published from time to timeonaspects of children’s lives such as dreams and imaginary friends which are necessarily dependent on children’s own perceptions and descriptions. Most of the books which discuss children of a specific age address the early years or adolescence, rather than the years in between. Only rarely arewebsites identified for possible review. Occasionally, books are recommended, or even sent, which make no mention of spirituality or children. Unsurprisingly, these are not considered for review! What are we to make of this? First, the perception by publishers of what the IJCS will be interested in, and therefore presumably how spirituality is perceived more broadly, is that it relates mainly to members of faith communities and educators, especially those working in religious education. Maybe, the type of books recommended reflects the long-standing difficulty of defining what is meant by spirituality. I suspect we will always face this and should see spirituality as a very loosely defined concept, drawing on a Wittgensteinian view of family INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDREN’S SPIRITUALITY 2019, VOL. 24, NO. 3, 225–227 https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为书评编辑,以及《国际儿童灵性杂志》的读者和撰稿人,我对与儿童灵性有关的主题有了特别的看法,这些主题是——或不是——被强调的;以及近年来的变化。这篇社论提供了一个机会来思考关于儿童精神的话语的现状,并建议一些方向,这和未来的研究可能会有用,尽管这不可避免地反映了我自己的兴趣和偏见在某种程度上。这也让我有机会感谢那些评论书籍的人,并鼓励其他人推荐合适的书籍和/或提供评论-如果有的话请联系我。不出所料,大多数书都是由出版商推荐的,作者有时会要求对他们的书进行评论,偶尔也会收到不请自来的评论。出版商倾向于推荐学术性、内容密集的书籍,或者用相对简单、通俗易懂的术语来处理特定问题,比如多动症、疾病或丧亲之痛。比较学术性的书籍,除了一些明显的例外,通常与宗教和/或宗教教育有关,在某些情况下也与牧师有关,但通常只泛指灵性。不那么学术化的书籍经常只是粗略地提到灵性,除了那些讨论实际项目的书籍,比如敬虔游戏,或者像正念这样的方法。最近有更多的书讨论儿童的灵性与全人教育的关系。关于儿童生活方面的书籍不时出版,如梦和想象中的朋友,这些书籍必然依赖于儿童自己的感知和描述。大多数讨论特定年龄儿童的书籍都是针对儿童的早期或青春期,而不是介于两者之间的时期。只有很少的网站被确定为可能的审查。偶尔会有一些书被推荐,甚至被送出去,却没有提到灵性或儿童。不出所料,这些都不需要审查!我们该怎么理解这件事?首先,出版商对IJCS感兴趣的内容的看法是,灵性主要与信仰团体和教育者有关,尤其是那些从事宗教教育工作的人,因此可以推测灵性是如何被更广泛地理解的。也许,推荐的书籍类型反映了长期以来难以定义灵性的含义。我怀疑我们将永远面对这个问题,并且应该将灵性视为一个非常松散的定义概念,借鉴维特根斯坦对家庭的看法。《国际儿童灵性杂志》2019,VOL. 24, NO. 11。3,225 - 227 https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial
As books review editor, as well as a reader of, and contributor to, the International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, I gain a particular perspective on the themes which are – and are not – highlighted in relation to children’s spirituality; and how these have changed over recent years. This editorial offers the opportunity to consider the current state of the discourse on children’s spirituality and to suggest some directions which this and future research might usefully take, though inevitably this reflects my own interests and prejudices to some extent. It also provides me with the chance to thank those who have reviewed books and to encourage other people to recommend suitable books and/or offer to review them – please contact me if so. The majority of books put forward are, unsurprisingly, suggested by publishers, with authors sometimes asking for their books to be reviewed and unsolicited reviews received occasionally. Publishers tend to suggest books which are either academic and fairly denseor deal in relatively simple andmore accessible termswith a particular issue such as ADHD, illness or bereavement. The more academic books, with some notable exceptions, are usually related to religion and/or religious education, and in some cases chaplaincy, but often refer only loosely to spirituality. The less academic ones frequently make only a somewhat cursory mention of spirituality, except those which discuss practical programmes, such as Godly Play, or approaches such as mindfulness. There have been more books recently which discuss children’s spirituality in relation to holistic education. Books are published from time to timeonaspects of children’s lives such as dreams and imaginary friends which are necessarily dependent on children’s own perceptions and descriptions. Most of the books which discuss children of a specific age address the early years or adolescence, rather than the years in between. Only rarely arewebsites identified for possible review. Occasionally, books are recommended, or even sent, which make no mention of spirituality or children. Unsurprisingly, these are not considered for review! What are we to make of this? First, the perception by publishers of what the IJCS will be interested in, and therefore presumably how spirituality is perceived more broadly, is that it relates mainly to members of faith communities and educators, especially those working in religious education. Maybe, the type of books recommended reflects the long-standing difficulty of defining what is meant by spirituality. I suspect we will always face this and should see spirituality as a very loosely defined concept, drawing on a Wittgensteinian view of family INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDREN’S SPIRITUALITY 2019, VOL. 24, NO. 3, 225–227 https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1652573
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信