博索姆朋友:詹姆斯·布坎南和威廉·鲁弗斯·金的亲密世界

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Jen Manion
{"title":"博索姆朋友:詹姆斯·布坎南和威廉·鲁弗斯·金的亲密世界","authors":"Jen Manion","doi":"10.1080/00182370.2021.2018277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"than in standard biographies, and more, proportionally, on how spycraft outsmarted the British. (Coe’s omission of the indispensable role of French sailors and soldiers at the Battle of Yorktown reinforces, unfortunately, an outdated view of Washington’s generalship and the prowess of the Continental Army.) Like other recent biographers, Coe shows that Washington was more involved in the messy party politics of the 1790s than one might glean from high school textbooks. She implies, perhaps more than Chernow, that Washington’s vanity and desire to lead should engender skepticism regarding his oft-expressed wish to return to life as a farmer. Coe does redeem Washington’s mother, Mary, from the condescension of earlier (male) historians. In Coe’s strongest challenge to our nation’s civic myth about Washington’s virtue, she consistently recounts his role as an “enslaver,” noting, for example, that as many as fifty persons this Founder held in bondage tried to escape. But, as Coe acknowledges, this analysis draws heavily from recent monographs by Erica Dunbar and Mary Thompson; Coe herself breaks no new scholarly ground. Moreover, she makes only passing reference to Washington’s extensive western land-holdings, which inevitably affected his policies toward Indians, poorer whites, and government power. In the end, Coe only partially fulfills her claim that she would “correct the record” on “understudied issues.” Coe adopts some scholarly conventions, such as footnotes for quotations from Washington and his contemporaries, most drawn from Founders Online, an extraordinary, newly available National Archives database. (Most of these quotations, including those about slavery, were also in Chernow’s biography, from printed or manuscript sources.) Many of Coe’s other assertions, however, lack clear citations, and she exhibits some carelessness even when criticizing Chernow. Editing should be sharper, both on substance (the Continental Army was not a “militia” [xiii]) and grammar (too many pronouns lack clear antecedents). You Never Forget Your First is insufficiently rigorous for most college courses, but general readers and high school students will find it an illuminating and engaging introduction to George Washington’s life and times.","PeriodicalId":44078,"journal":{"name":"HISTORIAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bosom friends: the intimate world of James Buchanan and William Rufus King\",\"authors\":\"Jen Manion\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00182370.2021.2018277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"than in standard biographies, and more, proportionally, on how spycraft outsmarted the British. (Coe’s omission of the indispensable role of French sailors and soldiers at the Battle of Yorktown reinforces, unfortunately, an outdated view of Washington’s generalship and the prowess of the Continental Army.) Like other recent biographers, Coe shows that Washington was more involved in the messy party politics of the 1790s than one might glean from high school textbooks. She implies, perhaps more than Chernow, that Washington’s vanity and desire to lead should engender skepticism regarding his oft-expressed wish to return to life as a farmer. Coe does redeem Washington’s mother, Mary, from the condescension of earlier (male) historians. In Coe’s strongest challenge to our nation’s civic myth about Washington’s virtue, she consistently recounts his role as an “enslaver,” noting, for example, that as many as fifty persons this Founder held in bondage tried to escape. But, as Coe acknowledges, this analysis draws heavily from recent monographs by Erica Dunbar and Mary Thompson; Coe herself breaks no new scholarly ground. Moreover, she makes only passing reference to Washington’s extensive western land-holdings, which inevitably affected his policies toward Indians, poorer whites, and government power. In the end, Coe only partially fulfills her claim that she would “correct the record” on “understudied issues.” Coe adopts some scholarly conventions, such as footnotes for quotations from Washington and his contemporaries, most drawn from Founders Online, an extraordinary, newly available National Archives database. (Most of these quotations, including those about slavery, were also in Chernow’s biography, from printed or manuscript sources.) Many of Coe’s other assertions, however, lack clear citations, and she exhibits some carelessness even when criticizing Chernow. Editing should be sharper, both on substance (the Continental Army was not a “militia” [xiii]) and grammar (too many pronouns lack clear antecedents). You Never Forget Your First is insufficiently rigorous for most college courses, but general readers and high school students will find it an illuminating and engaging introduction to George Washington’s life and times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HISTORIAN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HISTORIAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2021.2018277\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORIAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2021.2018277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比标准传记中的要多,也比间谍活动如何智胜英国人的比例更高。(不幸的是,科忽略了法国水手和士兵在约克镇战役中不可或缺的角色,这强化了对华盛顿将军地位和大陆军实力的过时看法。她暗示,也许比Chernow更重要的是,华盛顿的虚荣和领导欲望应该引起人们对他经常表达的回归农民生活的愿望的怀疑。科确实将华盛顿的母亲玛丽从早期(男性)历史学家的屈尊俯就中解救出来。科对我们国家关于华盛顿美德的公民神话提出了最强烈的挑战,她不断讲述他作为“奴隶”的角色,例如,她指出,这位创始人被奴役的多达50人试图逃跑。但是,正如科承认的那样,这一分析大量借鉴了埃里卡·邓巴和玛丽·汤普森最近的专著;科本人并没有开拓新的学术领域。此外,她只是顺便提到华盛顿在西部拥有大量土地,这不可避免地影响了他对印第安人、贫困白人和政府权力的政策。最终,科只是部分地实现了她的说法,即她将在“研究不足的问题”上“纠正记录”。科采用了一些学术惯例,比如引用华盛顿和他同时代人的话的脚注,大多数都来自Founders Online,这是一个非凡的、新提供的国家档案数据库。(这些引文中的大多数,包括关于奴隶制的引文,也出现在Chernow的传记中,来自印刷品或手稿。)然而,科的许多其他断言都缺乏明确的引用,即使在批评Chernow时,她也表现出了一些粗心。编辑应该更尖锐,无论是在实质内容(大陆军不是“民兵”[xiii])还是语法(太多代词缺乏明确的前因)上。《你永远不会忘记你的第一次》对于大多数大学课程来说不够严谨,但普通读者和高中生会发现它是对乔治·华盛顿生活和时代的一个启发性和引人入胜的介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bosom friends: the intimate world of James Buchanan and William Rufus King
than in standard biographies, and more, proportionally, on how spycraft outsmarted the British. (Coe’s omission of the indispensable role of French sailors and soldiers at the Battle of Yorktown reinforces, unfortunately, an outdated view of Washington’s generalship and the prowess of the Continental Army.) Like other recent biographers, Coe shows that Washington was more involved in the messy party politics of the 1790s than one might glean from high school textbooks. She implies, perhaps more than Chernow, that Washington’s vanity and desire to lead should engender skepticism regarding his oft-expressed wish to return to life as a farmer. Coe does redeem Washington’s mother, Mary, from the condescension of earlier (male) historians. In Coe’s strongest challenge to our nation’s civic myth about Washington’s virtue, she consistently recounts his role as an “enslaver,” noting, for example, that as many as fifty persons this Founder held in bondage tried to escape. But, as Coe acknowledges, this analysis draws heavily from recent monographs by Erica Dunbar and Mary Thompson; Coe herself breaks no new scholarly ground. Moreover, she makes only passing reference to Washington’s extensive western land-holdings, which inevitably affected his policies toward Indians, poorer whites, and government power. In the end, Coe only partially fulfills her claim that she would “correct the record” on “understudied issues.” Coe adopts some scholarly conventions, such as footnotes for quotations from Washington and his contemporaries, most drawn from Founders Online, an extraordinary, newly available National Archives database. (Most of these quotations, including those about slavery, were also in Chernow’s biography, from printed or manuscript sources.) Many of Coe’s other assertions, however, lack clear citations, and she exhibits some carelessness even when criticizing Chernow. Editing should be sharper, both on substance (the Continental Army was not a “militia” [xiii]) and grammar (too many pronouns lack clear antecedents). You Never Forget Your First is insufficiently rigorous for most college courses, but general readers and high school students will find it an illuminating and engaging introduction to George Washington’s life and times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HISTORIAN
HISTORIAN HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Founded in 1938, The Historian has one of the largest circulations of any scholarly journal in the US or Britain with over 13,000 paid subscribers, both individual and institutional. The Historian seeks to publish only the finest of contemporary and relevant historical scholarship. It is the commitment of The Historian to serve as an integrator for the historical profession, bringing together the many strands of historical analysis through the publication of a diverse collection of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信