妇科癌症患者骶骨密度测量的初步概念验证评估

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Gretta Borchardt BS (Primary Author) , Diane Krueger BS (Contributing Author) , Neil Binkley MD (Contributing Author) , Paul A. Anderson MD (Contributing Author) , Janelle Sobecki MD (Contributing Author)
{"title":"妇科癌症患者骶骨密度测量的初步概念验证评估","authors":"Gretta Borchardt BS (Primary Author) ,&nbsp;Diane Krueger BS (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Neil Binkley MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Paul A. Anderson MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Janelle Sobecki MD (Contributing Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Aims</h3><p>To evaluate a potential DXA approach to sacral BMD measurement using extended field and standard L1-4 scans in women with gynecologic cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Rationale/Background</h3><p>Few data exist regarding bone status in women with gynecologic cancer despite known bone toxic effects of treatment-induced menopause, chemotherapy, and pelvic radiation. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss almost certainly increases subsequent fracture risk. Pelvic insufficiency fracture is a potentially catastrophic complication occurring in up to 7.8% of women. It is plausible that sacral BMD measurement could identify women at higher risk for this complication. Whether sacral BMD can be measured as part of routine DXA scanning has not been explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects were from a study evaluating BMD change in women treated for gynecologic cancers. Standard clinical spine, hip, forearm and VFA scans, along with an extended length spine scan to include the sacrum, were acquired. Using a GE Lunar iDXA, sacral scans were obtained from the pubic tubercle cranially to the standard spine termination at T12. Sacral regions of interest (ROIs) were placed by outlining the sacrum (ROI 1) then this ROI was divided in half horizontally (ROIs 2 and 3; Figure 1). L1-L4 BMD from standard and extended scans were compared by Pearsons correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Sacral ROI BMD was correlated by Pearsons with mean total hip, L1-4 and 0.3 radius BMD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten women, mean (SD) age and BMI of 53.7 (11.0) years and 32.9 (9.5) kg/m2 were studied. All subjects underwent hysterectomy<span> with bilateral oophorectomy within 35 (14.9) days of baseline DXA scan. Mean L1-4 BMD was 1.146 (0.177) g/cm2 and lowest T-score -0.3 (1.5). Sacral BMD at ROIs 1, 2 &amp; 3 was 0.808 (0.192), 0.897 (0.170) and 0.771 (0.210) g/cm2 respectively. Extended spine scan L1-4 BMD was highly correlated (r = 0.996) with standard L1-4 spine BMD and demonstrated a low bias, -0.006 g/cm2. Sacral BMD of all ROIs correlated with L1-4 (r = 0.88 – 0.93; p &lt; 0.001) and mean total hip BMD (r = 0.79 – 0.84; p &lt; 0.05), but not 0.3 radius (r = -0.23 to -0.12).</span></p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>These data suggest that lumbar spine<span> BMD can be measured using longer scan length DXA, equivalent to standard L1-4 measurements. That sacral BMD corelates with trabecular (spine and hip) but not a cortical sites (0.3 radius) could be expected and may suggest potential utility to monitor BMD change following gyn cancer therapy. Future research will focus on sacral BMD reproducibility and change post treatment.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 101408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Proof of Concept Evaluation of Sacral BMD Measurement in Women with Gynecologic Cancers\",\"authors\":\"Gretta Borchardt BS (Primary Author) ,&nbsp;Diane Krueger BS (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Neil Binkley MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Paul A. Anderson MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Janelle Sobecki MD (Contributing Author)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose/Aims</h3><p>To evaluate a potential DXA approach to sacral BMD measurement using extended field and standard L1-4 scans in women with gynecologic cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Rationale/Background</h3><p>Few data exist regarding bone status in women with gynecologic cancer despite known bone toxic effects of treatment-induced menopause, chemotherapy, and pelvic radiation. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss almost certainly increases subsequent fracture risk. Pelvic insufficiency fracture is a potentially catastrophic complication occurring in up to 7.8% of women. It is plausible that sacral BMD measurement could identify women at higher risk for this complication. Whether sacral BMD can be measured as part of routine DXA scanning has not been explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects were from a study evaluating BMD change in women treated for gynecologic cancers. Standard clinical spine, hip, forearm and VFA scans, along with an extended length spine scan to include the sacrum, were acquired. Using a GE Lunar iDXA, sacral scans were obtained from the pubic tubercle cranially to the standard spine termination at T12. Sacral regions of interest (ROIs) were placed by outlining the sacrum (ROI 1) then this ROI was divided in half horizontally (ROIs 2 and 3; Figure 1). L1-L4 BMD from standard and extended scans were compared by Pearsons correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Sacral ROI BMD was correlated by Pearsons with mean total hip, L1-4 and 0.3 radius BMD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten women, mean (SD) age and BMI of 53.7 (11.0) years and 32.9 (9.5) kg/m2 were studied. All subjects underwent hysterectomy<span> with bilateral oophorectomy within 35 (14.9) days of baseline DXA scan. Mean L1-4 BMD was 1.146 (0.177) g/cm2 and lowest T-score -0.3 (1.5). Sacral BMD at ROIs 1, 2 &amp; 3 was 0.808 (0.192), 0.897 (0.170) and 0.771 (0.210) g/cm2 respectively. Extended spine scan L1-4 BMD was highly correlated (r = 0.996) with standard L1-4 spine BMD and demonstrated a low bias, -0.006 g/cm2. Sacral BMD of all ROIs correlated with L1-4 (r = 0.88 – 0.93; p &lt; 0.001) and mean total hip BMD (r = 0.79 – 0.84; p &lt; 0.05), but not 0.3 radius (r = -0.23 to -0.12).</span></p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>These data suggest that lumbar spine<span> BMD can be measured using longer scan length DXA, equivalent to standard L1-4 measurements. That sacral BMD corelates with trabecular (spine and hip) but not a cortical sites (0.3 radius) could be expected and may suggest potential utility to monitor BMD change following gyn cancer therapy. Future research will focus on sacral BMD reproducibility and change post treatment.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023000586\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023000586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目的:评估一种潜在的DXA方法,通过扩展视野和标准L1-4扫描测量妇科癌症女性的骶骨骨密度。基本原理/背景尽管已知治疗性绝经、化疗和盆腔放疗对女性妇科癌症患者的骨毒性作用,但很少有关于其骨状况的数据。癌症治疗引起的骨质流失几乎肯定会增加随后的骨折风险。骨盆功能不全骨折是一种潜在的灾难性并发症,发生率高达7.8%。骶骨骨密度测量可以识别出这种并发症的高风险女性,这似乎是合理的。骶骨骨密度是否可以作为常规DXA扫描的一部分进行测量尚未得到探讨。方法研究对象来自一项评估妇科癌症患者骨密度变化的研究。获得标准临床脊柱、髋关节、前臂和VFA扫描,以及包括骶骨在内的延长长度脊柱扫描。使用GE Lunar iDXA,从耻骨结节到T12的标准脊柱末端进行骶骨扫描。通过勾勒骶骨(ROI 1)来放置骶骨感兴趣区域(ROI 1),然后将该ROI水平分成两半(ROI 2和3;图1)通过pearson相关性和Bland-Altman分析比较标准扫描和扩展扫描的L1-L4骨密度。骶骨ROI骨密度与pearson平均全髋、L1-4和0.3桡骨骨密度相关。结果女性平均(SD)年龄为53.7(11.0)岁,BMI为32.9 (9.5)kg/m2。所有受试者在基线DXA扫描后35(14.9)天内行子宫切除和双侧卵巢切除术。平均L1-4骨密度为1.146 (0.177)g/cm2,最低t评分为-0.3(1.5)。骶骨骨密度在roi 1, 2和amp;3分别为0.808(0.192)、0.897(0.170)和0.771 (0.210)g/cm2。扩展脊柱扫描L1-4骨密度与标准L1-4骨密度高度相关(r = 0.996),偏差低,为-0.006 g/cm2。各roi的骶骨骨密度与L1-4相关(r = 0.88 - 0.93;p & lt;0.001)和平均髋总骨密度(r = 0.79 - 0.84;p & lt;0.05),但不是0.3半径(r = -0.23至-0.12)。这些数据表明,腰椎骨密度可以使用更长扫描长度的DXA测量,相当于标准L1-4测量。骶骨骨密度与骨小梁(脊柱和髋关节)相关,但与皮质部位(0.3半径)无关,这可能表明监测女性癌症治疗后骨密度变化的潜在用途。未来的研究将集中在骶骨骨密度的可重复性和治疗后的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Proof of Concept Evaluation of Sacral BMD Measurement in Women with Gynecologic Cancers

Purpose/Aims

To evaluate a potential DXA approach to sacral BMD measurement using extended field and standard L1-4 scans in women with gynecologic cancer.

Rationale/Background

Few data exist regarding bone status in women with gynecologic cancer despite known bone toxic effects of treatment-induced menopause, chemotherapy, and pelvic radiation. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss almost certainly increases subsequent fracture risk. Pelvic insufficiency fracture is a potentially catastrophic complication occurring in up to 7.8% of women. It is plausible that sacral BMD measurement could identify women at higher risk for this complication. Whether sacral BMD can be measured as part of routine DXA scanning has not been explored.

Methods

Subjects were from a study evaluating BMD change in women treated for gynecologic cancers. Standard clinical spine, hip, forearm and VFA scans, along with an extended length spine scan to include the sacrum, were acquired. Using a GE Lunar iDXA, sacral scans were obtained from the pubic tubercle cranially to the standard spine termination at T12. Sacral regions of interest (ROIs) were placed by outlining the sacrum (ROI 1) then this ROI was divided in half horizontally (ROIs 2 and 3; Figure 1). L1-L4 BMD from standard and extended scans were compared by Pearsons correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Sacral ROI BMD was correlated by Pearsons with mean total hip, L1-4 and 0.3 radius BMD.

Results

Ten women, mean (SD) age and BMI of 53.7 (11.0) years and 32.9 (9.5) kg/m2 were studied. All subjects underwent hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy within 35 (14.9) days of baseline DXA scan. Mean L1-4 BMD was 1.146 (0.177) g/cm2 and lowest T-score -0.3 (1.5). Sacral BMD at ROIs 1, 2 & 3 was 0.808 (0.192), 0.897 (0.170) and 0.771 (0.210) g/cm2 respectively. Extended spine scan L1-4 BMD was highly correlated (r = 0.996) with standard L1-4 spine BMD and demonstrated a low bias, -0.006 g/cm2. Sacral BMD of all ROIs correlated with L1-4 (r = 0.88 – 0.93; p < 0.001) and mean total hip BMD (r = 0.79 – 0.84; p < 0.05), but not 0.3 radius (r = -0.23 to -0.12).

Implications

These data suggest that lumbar spine BMD can be measured using longer scan length DXA, equivalent to standard L1-4 measurements. That sacral BMD corelates with trabecular (spine and hip) but not a cortical sites (0.3 radius) could be expected and may suggest potential utility to monitor BMD change following gyn cancer therapy. Future research will focus on sacral BMD reproducibility and change post treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信