新开发的阅读理解能力测试中的MCQ分析——对也门大学生英语学习者的研究

Iftikhar Yusuf Al-Ariqi, Jagannath K. Dange, Mir Mohsin
{"title":"新开发的阅读理解能力测试中的MCQ分析——对也门大学生英语学习者的研究","authors":"Iftikhar Yusuf Al-Ariqi, Jagannath K. Dange, Mir Mohsin","doi":"10.1504/IJQRE.2019.10021826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that the best way to test the students' ability in reading comprehension is the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for its validity and reliability. This paper tries to assess items and test quality in order to explore the relationship between difficulty index (p-value) and discrimination indices (DIs) with distractor efficiency (DE). The study was conducted among 134 second year Yemeni EFL students in Sana'a University, Yemen. Twenty MCQs analysed for p-value, DI and DE. Results indicated that the mean p-value and DI were 61.92 ± 25.1% and 0.31 ± 0.27, respectively. DI was noted to be maximum at p value range between 40% and 60%. Combining the two indices, 19 items could be called 'good' having a p-value from 20% to 90%, as well as a DI ≥ 0.40. Overall 75% items had two non-functional distractors (NFDs), while 20% items had three functional distractors and 5% had only one functional distractor.","PeriodicalId":90868,"journal":{"name":"International journal of quantitative research in education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The analysis of MCQs in a newly developed reading comprehension ability test: a study on Yemeni undergraduate EFL learners\",\"authors\":\"Iftikhar Yusuf Al-Ariqi, Jagannath K. Dange, Mir Mohsin\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJQRE.2019.10021826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies have shown that the best way to test the students' ability in reading comprehension is the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for its validity and reliability. This paper tries to assess items and test quality in order to explore the relationship between difficulty index (p-value) and discrimination indices (DIs) with distractor efficiency (DE). The study was conducted among 134 second year Yemeni EFL students in Sana'a University, Yemen. Twenty MCQs analysed for p-value, DI and DE. Results indicated that the mean p-value and DI were 61.92 ± 25.1% and 0.31 ± 0.27, respectively. DI was noted to be maximum at p value range between 40% and 60%. Combining the two indices, 19 items could be called 'good' having a p-value from 20% to 90%, as well as a DI ≥ 0.40. Overall 75% items had two non-functional distractors (NFDs), while 20% items had three functional distractors and 5% had only one functional distractor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of quantitative research in education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of quantitative research in education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2019.10021826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of quantitative research in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2019.10021826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,测试学生阅读理解能力的最佳方法是选择题,因为它具有效度和信度。本文试图通过评估题目和测试质量来探讨难度指数(p值)和辨别指数(DIs)与分心效率(DE)之间的关系。本研究在也门萨那大学的134名二年级学生中进行。分析20个mcq的p值、DI和DE,结果显示p值和DI的平均值分别为61.92±25.1%和0.31±0.27。在p值范围为40% ~ 60%时,DI值最大。综合这两个指标,有19个项目的p值在20% ~ 90%之间,且DI≥0.40,可称为“良好”。总的来说,75%的项目有两个非功能性干扰物,20%的项目有三个功能性干扰物,5%的项目只有一个功能性干扰物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The analysis of MCQs in a newly developed reading comprehension ability test: a study on Yemeni undergraduate EFL learners
Studies have shown that the best way to test the students' ability in reading comprehension is the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for its validity and reliability. This paper tries to assess items and test quality in order to explore the relationship between difficulty index (p-value) and discrimination indices (DIs) with distractor efficiency (DE). The study was conducted among 134 second year Yemeni EFL students in Sana'a University, Yemen. Twenty MCQs analysed for p-value, DI and DE. Results indicated that the mean p-value and DI were 61.92 ± 25.1% and 0.31 ± 0.27, respectively. DI was noted to be maximum at p value range between 40% and 60%. Combining the two indices, 19 items could be called 'good' having a p-value from 20% to 90%, as well as a DI ≥ 0.40. Overall 75% items had two non-functional distractors (NFDs), while 20% items had three functional distractors and 5% had only one functional distractor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信