新土耳其:地区抱负与国家焦虑

IF 2.6 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
S. Altuǧ
{"title":"新土耳其:地区抱负与国家焦虑","authors":"S. Altuǧ","doi":"10.1080/14623528.2022.2060516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern Turkey, as in other parts of the globe, the production and dissemination of patriotic histories has been part of the process of stateand nation-making. Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the aftermath of World War I, Turkish nationalists were able to forge an independent nation-state; and so, unlike the post-colonial world, the official narrative regarding the foundation of the new Turkish state did not suffer from a “sovereignty deficit” vis-à-vis the Western empires, nor did it embrace an anti-colonial discourse of resistance against the Empire. Nevertheless, the Turkish state did suffer from the anxiety of erosion of national sovereignty and this was played out on two fronts: the governance of ethno-religious difference in the country and relations with the West, both of which have been formative tropes in patriotic histories in Turkey. The foundation of Turkey as a politically sovereign nation-state, long before decolonization in the post-World War II period, has thus played a significant role in the construction of Turkish patriotic histories. On the one hand, the foundation myth of 1923 was depicted as an essential pride in the Turkish state/nation and contrasted with the subjugation of the colonized states/subjects of the Western empires. The trope of the Western threat, however, has never vanished from Turkish historical discourses. Indeed, it has revealed itself in the intimate links between the West and the ethnically non-Turkish/ non-Muslim citizens of Turkey as well as the cross-border threats outside its territory. The politics of history has been a tool of ethno-politics, manifesting and instigating the state’s aim to consolidate its national-scale power and unitary political project. Disseminated through various state institutions and actors, such as national education, statesponsored media, performances, and re-organization of urban and rural spaces, the early official history of the Turkish Republic transformed a heterogeneous social space ruled by the logic of imperial diversity into a homogenous social space governed by a modern nation-state. The politics of history in Turkey has gone through various phases. While the earlier Kemalist patriotic histories were preoccupied with nationalist consolidation, from the mid-2000s onwards, domination on a regional scale preponderated, acquiring a new magnitude over the former concerns. Here, I chart the development of the latter period under the rule of the Justice and Development Party (AKP). As much as exploring","PeriodicalId":46849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genocide Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"182 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Turkey: Regional Aspiration and National Anxiety\",\"authors\":\"S. Altuǧ\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623528.2022.2060516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In modern Turkey, as in other parts of the globe, the production and dissemination of patriotic histories has been part of the process of stateand nation-making. Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the aftermath of World War I, Turkish nationalists were able to forge an independent nation-state; and so, unlike the post-colonial world, the official narrative regarding the foundation of the new Turkish state did not suffer from a “sovereignty deficit” vis-à-vis the Western empires, nor did it embrace an anti-colonial discourse of resistance against the Empire. Nevertheless, the Turkish state did suffer from the anxiety of erosion of national sovereignty and this was played out on two fronts: the governance of ethno-religious difference in the country and relations with the West, both of which have been formative tropes in patriotic histories in Turkey. The foundation of Turkey as a politically sovereign nation-state, long before decolonization in the post-World War II period, has thus played a significant role in the construction of Turkish patriotic histories. On the one hand, the foundation myth of 1923 was depicted as an essential pride in the Turkish state/nation and contrasted with the subjugation of the colonized states/subjects of the Western empires. The trope of the Western threat, however, has never vanished from Turkish historical discourses. Indeed, it has revealed itself in the intimate links between the West and the ethnically non-Turkish/ non-Muslim citizens of Turkey as well as the cross-border threats outside its territory. The politics of history has been a tool of ethno-politics, manifesting and instigating the state’s aim to consolidate its national-scale power and unitary political project. Disseminated through various state institutions and actors, such as national education, statesponsored media, performances, and re-organization of urban and rural spaces, the early official history of the Turkish Republic transformed a heterogeneous social space ruled by the logic of imperial diversity into a homogenous social space governed by a modern nation-state. The politics of history in Turkey has gone through various phases. While the earlier Kemalist patriotic histories were preoccupied with nationalist consolidation, from the mid-2000s onwards, domination on a regional scale preponderated, acquiring a new magnitude over the former concerns. Here, I chart the development of the latter period under the rule of the Justice and Development Party (AKP). As much as exploring\",\"PeriodicalId\":46849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genocide Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genocide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2022.2060516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genocide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2022.2060516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在现代土耳其,与世界其他地区一样,爱国历史的制作和传播一直是国家和民族建设过程的一部分。在第一次世界大战后奥斯曼帝国崩溃后,土耳其民族主义者得以建立一个独立的民族国家;因此,与后殖民世界不同,关于土耳其新国家成立的官方叙事与西方帝国相比没有“主权赤字”,也没有包含抵抗帝国的反殖民话语。尽管如此,土耳其国家确实遭受了国家主权被侵蚀的焦虑,这在两个方面表现出来:对该国种族宗教差异的治理和与西方的关系,这两个方面都是土耳其爱国主义历史上的形成性比喻。土耳其作为一个政治主权民族国家的基础,早在第二次世界大战后的非殖民化之前,就在土耳其爱国历史的建设中发挥了重要作用。一方面,1923年的奠基神话被描绘成土耳其国家/民族的一种基本自豪感,并与西方帝国对被殖民国家/臣民的征服形成对比。然而,西方威胁的比喻从未从土耳其的历史话语中消失。事实上,它暴露了西方与土耳其非土耳其/非穆斯林公民之间的密切联系,以及其领土外的跨境威胁。历史政治一直是民族政治的工具,体现和煽动国家巩固其国家规模权力和统一政治计划的目标。土耳其共和国早期的官方历史通过各种国家机构和行动者传播,如国家教育、国家赞助的媒体、表演和城乡空间的重组,将由帝国多样性逻辑统治的异质社会空间转变为由现代民族国家统治的同质社会空间。土耳其的历史政治经历了不同的阶段。虽然早期的凯末尔主义爱国主义历史专注于民族主义的巩固,但从2000年代中期开始,在地区范围内的统治被高估了,比以前的担忧更为严重。在这里,我描绘了正义与发展党(AKP)统治下的后一时期的发展。和探索一样多
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Turkey: Regional Aspiration and National Anxiety
In modern Turkey, as in other parts of the globe, the production and dissemination of patriotic histories has been part of the process of stateand nation-making. Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the aftermath of World War I, Turkish nationalists were able to forge an independent nation-state; and so, unlike the post-colonial world, the official narrative regarding the foundation of the new Turkish state did not suffer from a “sovereignty deficit” vis-à-vis the Western empires, nor did it embrace an anti-colonial discourse of resistance against the Empire. Nevertheless, the Turkish state did suffer from the anxiety of erosion of national sovereignty and this was played out on two fronts: the governance of ethno-religious difference in the country and relations with the West, both of which have been formative tropes in patriotic histories in Turkey. The foundation of Turkey as a politically sovereign nation-state, long before decolonization in the post-World War II period, has thus played a significant role in the construction of Turkish patriotic histories. On the one hand, the foundation myth of 1923 was depicted as an essential pride in the Turkish state/nation and contrasted with the subjugation of the colonized states/subjects of the Western empires. The trope of the Western threat, however, has never vanished from Turkish historical discourses. Indeed, it has revealed itself in the intimate links between the West and the ethnically non-Turkish/ non-Muslim citizens of Turkey as well as the cross-border threats outside its territory. The politics of history has been a tool of ethno-politics, manifesting and instigating the state’s aim to consolidate its national-scale power and unitary political project. Disseminated through various state institutions and actors, such as national education, statesponsored media, performances, and re-organization of urban and rural spaces, the early official history of the Turkish Republic transformed a heterogeneous social space ruled by the logic of imperial diversity into a homogenous social space governed by a modern nation-state. The politics of history in Turkey has gone through various phases. While the earlier Kemalist patriotic histories were preoccupied with nationalist consolidation, from the mid-2000s onwards, domination on a regional scale preponderated, acquiring a new magnitude over the former concerns. Here, I chart the development of the latter period under the rule of the Justice and Development Party (AKP). As much as exploring
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genocide Research
Journal of Genocide Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信