艺术教育与非艺术教育学生创造性思维的比较研究

Q1 Social Sciences
Kani Ulger
{"title":"艺术教育与非艺术教育学生创造性思维的比较研究","authors":"Kani Ulger","doi":"10.3846/cs.2023.14593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creative thinking measurement for everyone in different domains is the most crucial critical subject. Therefore, the current discussion continues whether creativity in various fields different.This study aimed to measurement the students’ creative thinking scores in various domains disciplines to reveal differences. The main research question was as followed: Do whether students’creative thinking scores of students in art and non-art education differ significantly? The method was a causal-comparative research design. Participant students (N = 456, meanage = 16–21) were equivalent regarding some variations; as education disciplines and ages. While however, the art and non-art education students were the domain-specific was art education students, the and domaingeneral,was non-art education students respectively. The present study determined a significant difference between domain-specific and domain-general on creative thinking scores in favor of the non-art education students in the range of ages 16 to 21. The study concluded that alternative instruments with domain-specific content needed to measure individuals’ creative thinking in the domain-specific. This study suggested future research to conduct creativity measurement comparatively individuals in different age ranges and domains fields.","PeriodicalId":38085,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARISON STUDY FROM A CREATIVE THINKING PERSPECTIVE IN DIFFERENT DOMAINS AS ART EDUCATION AND NON-ART EDUCATION STUDENTS\",\"authors\":\"Kani Ulger\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/cs.2023.14593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Creative thinking measurement for everyone in different domains is the most crucial critical subject. Therefore, the current discussion continues whether creativity in various fields different.This study aimed to measurement the students’ creative thinking scores in various domains disciplines to reveal differences. The main research question was as followed: Do whether students’creative thinking scores of students in art and non-art education differ significantly? The method was a causal-comparative research design. Participant students (N = 456, meanage = 16–21) were equivalent regarding some variations; as education disciplines and ages. While however, the art and non-art education students were the domain-specific was art education students, the and domaingeneral,was non-art education students respectively. The present study determined a significant difference between domain-specific and domain-general on creative thinking scores in favor of the non-art education students in the range of ages 16 to 21. The study concluded that alternative instruments with domain-specific content needed to measure individuals’ creative thinking in the domain-specific. This study suggested future research to conduct creativity measurement comparatively individuals in different age ranges and domains fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creativity Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creativity Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.14593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.14593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衡量不同领域的每个人的创造性思维是最关键的关键课题。因此,目前的讨论仍在继续,创意是否在各个领域有所不同。本研究旨在测量学生在不同学科领域的创造性思维得分,以揭示差异。研究的主要问题是:艺术教育和非艺术教育学生的创造性思维得分是否存在显著差异?该方法是一种因果比较研究设计。参与者学生(N=456,平均年龄=16-21)在某些变化方面相当;作为教育学科和年龄。然而,艺术教育和非艺术教育的学生分别是特定领域的艺术教育学生、一般领域的非艺术教育学生。本研究确定,在16至21岁的非艺术教育学生中,特定领域和一般领域的创造性思维得分存在显著差异。该研究得出结论,具有特定领域内容的替代工具需要衡量个人在特定领域的创造性思维。本研究建议未来的研究对不同年龄段和领域的个体进行创造力测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A COMPARISON STUDY FROM A CREATIVE THINKING PERSPECTIVE IN DIFFERENT DOMAINS AS ART EDUCATION AND NON-ART EDUCATION STUDENTS
Creative thinking measurement for everyone in different domains is the most crucial critical subject. Therefore, the current discussion continues whether creativity in various fields different.This study aimed to measurement the students’ creative thinking scores in various domains disciplines to reveal differences. The main research question was as followed: Do whether students’creative thinking scores of students in art and non-art education differ significantly? The method was a causal-comparative research design. Participant students (N = 456, meanage = 16–21) were equivalent regarding some variations; as education disciplines and ages. While however, the art and non-art education students were the domain-specific was art education students, the and domaingeneral,was non-art education students respectively. The present study determined a significant difference between domain-specific and domain-general on creative thinking scores in favor of the non-art education students in the range of ages 16 to 21. The study concluded that alternative instruments with domain-specific content needed to measure individuals’ creative thinking in the domain-specific. This study suggested future research to conduct creativity measurement comparatively individuals in different age ranges and domains fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Creativity Studies
Creativity Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Creativity Studies accepts original research articles with a focus on communication within the creative society. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars from diverse disciplines such as philosophy, sociology, history, political, communication and information sciences. Creativity Studies also publishes survey papers and descriptions of academic events in this area. The journal issues will be organized around different issues on creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信