{"title":"最小化人工物料搬运任务设计中的低背累积负荷:一种优化方法","authors":"S. Almosnino, Jessica Cappelletto","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2021.2021458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS We present a practical method for minimizing low-back cumulative loading that leverages digital human modeling capabilities and optimization using an evolutionary algorithm. We demonstrate use of the method in a simulated lifting task. Our results show that this method is robust to different routines for calculating cumulative loading. The proposed method can aid ergonomics engineers in addressing a potential risk factor early in the design stage, even in the absence of an established threshold limit value, and it provides a time saving by eliminating the need to adjust workplace parameters across many design possibilities. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background Excessive exposure to low-back cumulative loading (LBCL) has been implicated as a risk factor for developing pain or injury during manual material handling (MMH) tasks. However, addressing LBCL during conceptual work design is challenging because of a lack of an established and widely accepted LBCL threshold limit value. We therefore formulate the design challenge using an optimization framework aided by digital human modeling (DHM). Methods We constructed a hypothetical MMH task requiring lifting, carrying, and placement of boxes into 16 storage locations. External loads were composed of four different mass categories handled 250 times, with four different relative handling frequencies. Resulting low back compressive force time series were integrated according to four suggested methods. Subsequently, we defined our objective function and constraints, and obtained a solution using an evolutionary algorithm. Results The percentage agreement between the four different relative handling frequencies and integration methods ranged between 89.5% and 100%. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance values ranged between 0.74 and 1.0, indicating good to perfect agreement among the solutions. Conclusion There is consensus is that minimizing LBCL exposure is beneficial, particularly during task design phases. Our results show that, irrespective of the theoretical background pertaining to LBCL quantification, the method proposed produces a robust and largely similar solution, at least for the MMH scenarios we simulated. Our proposed approach takes advantage of DHM capabilities to simulate diverse MMH scenarios and provides solution estimates at the conceptual design phase. The proposed method can be expanded using multi-objective optimizations schemes and additional constraints to provide a solution that addresses multiple injury and fatigue pathways.","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"9 1","pages":"124 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing Low Back Cumulative Loading during Design of Manual Material Handling Tasks: An Optimization Approach\",\"authors\":\"S. Almosnino, Jessica Cappelletto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24725838.2021.2021458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS We present a practical method for minimizing low-back cumulative loading that leverages digital human modeling capabilities and optimization using an evolutionary algorithm. We demonstrate use of the method in a simulated lifting task. Our results show that this method is robust to different routines for calculating cumulative loading. The proposed method can aid ergonomics engineers in addressing a potential risk factor early in the design stage, even in the absence of an established threshold limit value, and it provides a time saving by eliminating the need to adjust workplace parameters across many design possibilities. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background Excessive exposure to low-back cumulative loading (LBCL) has been implicated as a risk factor for developing pain or injury during manual material handling (MMH) tasks. However, addressing LBCL during conceptual work design is challenging because of a lack of an established and widely accepted LBCL threshold limit value. We therefore formulate the design challenge using an optimization framework aided by digital human modeling (DHM). Methods We constructed a hypothetical MMH task requiring lifting, carrying, and placement of boxes into 16 storage locations. External loads were composed of four different mass categories handled 250 times, with four different relative handling frequencies. Resulting low back compressive force time series were integrated according to four suggested methods. Subsequently, we defined our objective function and constraints, and obtained a solution using an evolutionary algorithm. Results The percentage agreement between the four different relative handling frequencies and integration methods ranged between 89.5% and 100%. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance values ranged between 0.74 and 1.0, indicating good to perfect agreement among the solutions. Conclusion There is consensus is that minimizing LBCL exposure is beneficial, particularly during task design phases. Our results show that, irrespective of the theoretical background pertaining to LBCL quantification, the method proposed produces a robust and largely similar solution, at least for the MMH scenarios we simulated. Our proposed approach takes advantage of DHM capabilities to simulate diverse MMH scenarios and provides solution estimates at the conceptual design phase. The proposed method can be expanded using multi-objective optimizations schemes and additional constraints to provide a solution that addresses multiple injury and fatigue pathways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"124 - 133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.2021458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.2021458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
我们提出了一种实用的方法来最小化腰背累积负荷,该方法利用数字人体建模能力和使用进化算法进行优化。我们在模拟的起重任务中演示了该方法的使用。结果表明,该方法对不同的累积荷载计算例程具有较强的鲁棒性。所提出的方法可以帮助人体工程学工程师在设计阶段早期解决潜在的风险因素,即使在没有确定阈值的情况下,它也可以通过消除在许多设计可能性中调整工作场所参数的需要来节省时间。技术摘要背景:过度暴露于腰背累积负荷(LBCL)已被认为是在手工搬运(MMH)任务中发生疼痛或损伤的危险因素。然而,由于缺乏一个公认的、被广泛接受的LBCL阈值,在概念工程设计期间解决LBCL问题是具有挑战性的。因此,我们使用数字人体建模(DHM)辅助的优化框架来制定设计挑战。方法我们构建了一个假设的MMH任务,要求将箱子抬起、搬运和放置到16个存储位置。由四种不同质量类别组成的外部负载处理250次,有四种不同的相对处理频率。根据建议的四种方法对得到的低背压缩力时间序列进行积分。在此基础上,定义了目标函数和约束条件,并采用进化算法求解。结果4种不同的相对处理频率和综合方法的符合率在89.5% ~ 100%之间。Kendall’s coefficient of concordance值在0.74 ~ 1.0之间,表明解决方案之间的一致性很好到完全。结论:最小化LBCL暴露是有益的,尤其是在任务设计阶段。我们的研究结果表明,无论与LBCL量化相关的理论背景如何,所提出的方法都能产生一个鲁棒且基本相似的解决方案,至少对于我们模拟的MMH场景而言是如此。我们提出的方法利用DHM功能来模拟各种MMH场景,并在概念设计阶段提供解决方案估计。所提出的方法可以使用多目标优化方案和附加约束进行扩展,以提供解决多种损伤和疲劳途径的解决方案。
Minimizing Low Back Cumulative Loading during Design of Manual Material Handling Tasks: An Optimization Approach
OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS We present a practical method for minimizing low-back cumulative loading that leverages digital human modeling capabilities and optimization using an evolutionary algorithm. We demonstrate use of the method in a simulated lifting task. Our results show that this method is robust to different routines for calculating cumulative loading. The proposed method can aid ergonomics engineers in addressing a potential risk factor early in the design stage, even in the absence of an established threshold limit value, and it provides a time saving by eliminating the need to adjust workplace parameters across many design possibilities. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background Excessive exposure to low-back cumulative loading (LBCL) has been implicated as a risk factor for developing pain or injury during manual material handling (MMH) tasks. However, addressing LBCL during conceptual work design is challenging because of a lack of an established and widely accepted LBCL threshold limit value. We therefore formulate the design challenge using an optimization framework aided by digital human modeling (DHM). Methods We constructed a hypothetical MMH task requiring lifting, carrying, and placement of boxes into 16 storage locations. External loads were composed of four different mass categories handled 250 times, with four different relative handling frequencies. Resulting low back compressive force time series were integrated according to four suggested methods. Subsequently, we defined our objective function and constraints, and obtained a solution using an evolutionary algorithm. Results The percentage agreement between the four different relative handling frequencies and integration methods ranged between 89.5% and 100%. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance values ranged between 0.74 and 1.0, indicating good to perfect agreement among the solutions. Conclusion There is consensus is that minimizing LBCL exposure is beneficial, particularly during task design phases. Our results show that, irrespective of the theoretical background pertaining to LBCL quantification, the method proposed produces a robust and largely similar solution, at least for the MMH scenarios we simulated. Our proposed approach takes advantage of DHM capabilities to simulate diverse MMH scenarios and provides solution estimates at the conceptual design phase. The proposed method can be expanded using multi-objective optimizations schemes and additional constraints to provide a solution that addresses multiple injury and fatigue pathways.