托洛茨基与野兰花

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Rorty
{"title":"托洛茨基与野兰花","authors":"R. Rorty","doi":"10.1215/0961754x-10046488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Among Rorty’s most admired essays, and probably his most autobiographical, “Trotsky and the Wild Orchids” made its first appearance as a column in Common Knowledge during the journal’s inaugural year. Here it is reprinted, thirty years later, in a symposium called “Whatever Happened to Richard Rorty?” He explains in this essay that, as a child, he loved things that would seem to others contradictory, for example the Trotskian socialism to which his family was committed and the wild orchids that he would search for in the local mountains. Finding his own way between what appeared to others contrary kinds of demand or appeal, he never settled, as a philosopher and public intellectual, on syntheses that made good sense to his contemporaries. They were unable to locate him on their intellectual and political maps. As he writes, “If there is anything to the idea that the best intellectual position is one which is attacked with equal vigor from the political right and the political left, then I am in good shape. . . . The left’s favorite word for me is ‘complacent,’ just as the right’s is ‘irresponsible.’ ” The editors of Common Knowledge, a venue that Rorty helped to found, have reprinted this essay as a way of stating their view that nothing has “happened to Richard Rorty” in the past three decades that did not happen as well when he was active in his own self- defense. He was misconstrued but indispensable when alive, and has remained so in the decades since.","PeriodicalId":45679,"journal":{"name":"Common Knowledge","volume":"28 1","pages":"366 - 379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trotsky and the Wild Orchids\",\"authors\":\"R. Rorty\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/0961754x-10046488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Among Rorty’s most admired essays, and probably his most autobiographical, “Trotsky and the Wild Orchids” made its first appearance as a column in Common Knowledge during the journal’s inaugural year. Here it is reprinted, thirty years later, in a symposium called “Whatever Happened to Richard Rorty?” He explains in this essay that, as a child, he loved things that would seem to others contradictory, for example the Trotskian socialism to which his family was committed and the wild orchids that he would search for in the local mountains. Finding his own way between what appeared to others contrary kinds of demand or appeal, he never settled, as a philosopher and public intellectual, on syntheses that made good sense to his contemporaries. They were unable to locate him on their intellectual and political maps. As he writes, “If there is anything to the idea that the best intellectual position is one which is attacked with equal vigor from the political right and the political left, then I am in good shape. . . . The left’s favorite word for me is ‘complacent,’ just as the right’s is ‘irresponsible.’ ” The editors of Common Knowledge, a venue that Rorty helped to found, have reprinted this essay as a way of stating their view that nothing has “happened to Richard Rorty” in the past three decades that did not happen as well when he was active in his own self- defense. He was misconstrued but indispensable when alive, and has remained so in the decades since.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Common Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"366 - 379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Common Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-10046488\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-10046488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:在罗蒂最受钦佩的散文中,可能也是他最自传体的散文之一,《托洛茨基与野兰花》在该杂志创刊之年首次作为专栏出现在《常识》杂志上。三十年后,在一个名为“Richard Rorty发生了什么?”的研讨会上,这篇文章被转载了。他在这篇文章中解释说,小时候,他喜欢别人认为矛盾的东西,比如他的家人所致力于的托洛茨基社会主义,以及他将在当地山区寻找的野生兰花。作为一名哲学家和公共知识分子,他在其他人看来相反的需求或诉求之间找到了自己的道路,但他从未在对同时代人有意义的综合上下定决心。他们无法在他们的知识和政治地图上找到他。正如他所写,“如果说最好的知识分子职位是一个受到政治右翼和政治左翼同等有力攻击的职位,那么我的状态很好……左派对我来说最喜欢的词是‘自满’,就像右派的词是“不负责任”一样,他们转载了这篇文章,以此表达他们的观点,即在过去的三十年里,理查德·罗蒂没有发生过任何事情,而当他积极自卫时,这些事情也没有发生。他被误解了,但在活着的时候是不可或缺的,并且在此后的几十年里一直如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trotsky and the Wild Orchids
Abstract:Among Rorty’s most admired essays, and probably his most autobiographical, “Trotsky and the Wild Orchids” made its first appearance as a column in Common Knowledge during the journal’s inaugural year. Here it is reprinted, thirty years later, in a symposium called “Whatever Happened to Richard Rorty?” He explains in this essay that, as a child, he loved things that would seem to others contradictory, for example the Trotskian socialism to which his family was committed and the wild orchids that he would search for in the local mountains. Finding his own way between what appeared to others contrary kinds of demand or appeal, he never settled, as a philosopher and public intellectual, on syntheses that made good sense to his contemporaries. They were unable to locate him on their intellectual and political maps. As he writes, “If there is anything to the idea that the best intellectual position is one which is attacked with equal vigor from the political right and the political left, then I am in good shape. . . . The left’s favorite word for me is ‘complacent,’ just as the right’s is ‘irresponsible.’ ” The editors of Common Knowledge, a venue that Rorty helped to found, have reprinted this essay as a way of stating their view that nothing has “happened to Richard Rorty” in the past three decades that did not happen as well when he was active in his own self- defense. He was misconstrued but indispensable when alive, and has remained so in the decades since.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Common Knowledge
Common Knowledge HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信