在低风险测试中,受试者之间与受试者内部的测试努力和测试情绪变化

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
B. Perkins, D. Pastor, S. Finney
{"title":"在低风险测试中,受试者之间与受试者内部的测试努力和测试情绪变化","authors":"B. Perkins, D. Pastor, S. Finney","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2021.1987905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When tests are low stakes for examinees, meaning there are little to no personal consequences associated with test results, some examinees put little effort into their performance. To understand the causes and consequences of diminished effort, researchers correlate test-taking effort with other variables, such as test-taking emotions and test performance. Most studies correlate examinees’ overall level of test-taking effort with other variables, with fewer studies considering variables related to changing effort levels during testing. To understand if fluctuations in effort during testing relate to fluctuations in emotions, we collected effort and emotions (anger, boredom, emotionality, enjoyment, pride, worry) data from 768 university students three times during a low-stakes institutional accountability test. Examinees greatly varied in their average levels of effort and average levels of emotions during testing; relatively less variability was observed in these variables during testing. Average levels of emotions were predictive of effort, but fluctuations in emotions during testing were not. Our findings indicate that researchers should consider the proportion of intraindividual and interindividual variability in effort when considering predictors of test-taking effort.","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"285 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between- versus Within-Examinee Variability in Test-Taking Effort and Test Emotions during a Low-Stakes Test\",\"authors\":\"B. Perkins, D. Pastor, S. Finney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08957347.2021.1987905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT When tests are low stakes for examinees, meaning there are little to no personal consequences associated with test results, some examinees put little effort into their performance. To understand the causes and consequences of diminished effort, researchers correlate test-taking effort with other variables, such as test-taking emotions and test performance. Most studies correlate examinees’ overall level of test-taking effort with other variables, with fewer studies considering variables related to changing effort levels during testing. To understand if fluctuations in effort during testing relate to fluctuations in emotions, we collected effort and emotions (anger, boredom, emotionality, enjoyment, pride, worry) data from 768 university students three times during a low-stakes institutional accountability test. Examinees greatly varied in their average levels of effort and average levels of emotions during testing; relatively less variability was observed in these variables during testing. Average levels of emotions were predictive of effort, but fluctuations in emotions during testing were not. Our findings indicate that researchers should consider the proportion of intraindividual and interindividual variability in effort when considering predictors of test-taking effort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Measurement in Education\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"285 - 300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Measurement in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2021.1987905\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2021.1987905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当考试对考生来说是低风险的,这意味着考试结果几乎没有个人后果,一些考生对自己的表现不太努力。为了了解努力减少的原因和后果,研究人员将考试努力与其他变量联系起来,如考试情绪和考试成绩。大多数研究将考生的整体考试努力水平与其他变量联系起来,很少有研究考虑与考试过程中努力水平变化相关的变量。为了了解测试过程中努力的波动是否与情绪的波动有关,我们在一项低风险制度责任测试中三次收集了768名大学生的努力和情绪(愤怒、无聊、情绪、享受、骄傲、担忧)的数据。考生在考试中的平均努力水平和平均情绪水平差异很大;在测试期间,这些变量的可变性相对较小。平均情绪水平可以预测努力程度,但测试过程中情绪的波动却不能。我们的研究结果表明,研究人员在考虑考试努力的预测因素时,应该考虑个体内部和个体之间的努力变异性的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between- versus Within-Examinee Variability in Test-Taking Effort and Test Emotions during a Low-Stakes Test
ABSTRACT When tests are low stakes for examinees, meaning there are little to no personal consequences associated with test results, some examinees put little effort into their performance. To understand the causes and consequences of diminished effort, researchers correlate test-taking effort with other variables, such as test-taking emotions and test performance. Most studies correlate examinees’ overall level of test-taking effort with other variables, with fewer studies considering variables related to changing effort levels during testing. To understand if fluctuations in effort during testing relate to fluctuations in emotions, we collected effort and emotions (anger, boredom, emotionality, enjoyment, pride, worry) data from 768 university students three times during a low-stakes institutional accountability test. Examinees greatly varied in their average levels of effort and average levels of emotions during testing; relatively less variability was observed in these variables during testing. Average levels of emotions were predictive of effort, but fluctuations in emotions during testing were not. Our findings indicate that researchers should consider the proportion of intraindividual and interindividual variability in effort when considering predictors of test-taking effort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信