内科培训生升级协议的制定与实施

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ATS scholar Pub Date : 2023-07-27 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0009IN
Seda Babroudi, Sharanya Mohanty, Aliysa Rajwani, Leidy Guzman, Langley Topper, Samantha Asber, Karen Freund, Sucharita Kher
{"title":"内科培训生升级协议的制定与实施","authors":"Seda Babroudi, Sharanya Mohanty, Aliysa Rajwani, Leidy Guzman, Langley Topper, Samantha Asber, Karen Freund, Sucharita Kher","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0009IN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overnight, physicians in training receive less direct supervision. Decreased direct supervision requires trainees to appropriately assess patients at risk of clinical deterioration and escalate to supervising physicians. Failure of trainees to escalate contributes to adverse patient safety events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To standardize the evaluation of patients at risk of deterioration overnight by internal medicine residents, increase communication between residents and supervising physicians, and improve perceptions of patient safety at a tertiary academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary stakeholder team developed an overnight escalation-of-care protocol for residents. The protocol was implemented with badge buddies and an educational campaign targeted at residents, supervising physicians, and nursing staff. Residents and supervising physicians completed anonymous surveys to assess the use of the protocol; the frequency of overnight communication between residents and supervising physicians; and perceptions of escalation and patient safety before, immediately after (\"early postintervention\"), and 8 months after (\"delayed postintervention\") the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five (100%) residents participated in the intervention, and 57-89% of those invited to complete surveys at the various time points responded. After the intervention, 82% of residents reported using the protocol, though no change was observed in the frequency of communication between residents and supervising physicians. After the implementation, residents perceived that patient care was safer (early postintervention, 47%; delayed postintervention, 72%; <i>P</i> = 0.02), and interns expressed decreased fear of waking and being criticized by supervising physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An escalation-of-care protocol was developed and successfully implemented using a multimodal approach. The implementation and dissemination of the protocol standardized resident escalation overnight and improved resident-perceived patient safety and interns' comfort with escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Implementation of an Escalation Protocol for Internal Medicine Trainees.\",\"authors\":\"Seda Babroudi, Sharanya Mohanty, Aliysa Rajwani, Leidy Guzman, Langley Topper, Samantha Asber, Karen Freund, Sucharita Kher\",\"doi\":\"10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0009IN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overnight, physicians in training receive less direct supervision. Decreased direct supervision requires trainees to appropriately assess patients at risk of clinical deterioration and escalate to supervising physicians. Failure of trainees to escalate contributes to adverse patient safety events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To standardize the evaluation of patients at risk of deterioration overnight by internal medicine residents, increase communication between residents and supervising physicians, and improve perceptions of patient safety at a tertiary academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary stakeholder team developed an overnight escalation-of-care protocol for residents. The protocol was implemented with badge buddies and an educational campaign targeted at residents, supervising physicians, and nursing staff. Residents and supervising physicians completed anonymous surveys to assess the use of the protocol; the frequency of overnight communication between residents and supervising physicians; and perceptions of escalation and patient safety before, immediately after (\\\"early postintervention\\\"), and 8 months after (\\\"delayed postintervention\\\") the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five (100%) residents participated in the intervention, and 57-89% of those invited to complete surveys at the various time points responded. After the intervention, 82% of residents reported using the protocol, though no change was observed in the frequency of communication between residents and supervising physicians. After the implementation, residents perceived that patient care was safer (early postintervention, 47%; delayed postintervention, 72%; <i>P</i> = 0.02), and interns expressed decreased fear of waking and being criticized by supervising physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An escalation-of-care protocol was developed and successfully implemented using a multimodal approach. The implementation and dissemination of the protocol standardized resident escalation overnight and improved resident-perceived patient safety and interns' comfort with escalation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATS scholar\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATS scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0009IN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0009IN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一夜之间,受训医生接受的直接指导减少了。减少直接监督要求受训医师对有临床恶化风险的患者进行适当评估,并上报主管医师。如果受训医师不能及时上报,就会导致不良的患者安全事件:在一家三级学术医疗中心,规范内科住院医师对有病情恶化风险的患者的隔夜评估,加强住院医师与指导医师之间的沟通,提高患者的安全感:多学科利益相关者团队为住院医师制定了通宵护理升级协议。该方案通过徽章伙伴和针对住院医师、主管医师及护理人员的教育活动得以实施。住院医师和上级医师完成了匿名调查,以评估协议的使用情况、住院医师和上级医师之间的通宵沟通频率,以及干预前、干预后("早期干预后")和干预后 8 个月("延迟干预后")对护理升级和患者安全的看法:75名住院医师(100%)参与了干预,在受邀在不同时间点完成调查的住院医师中,57%-89%做出了回应。干预结束后,82% 的住院医师表示使用了协议,但住院医师与指导医师之间的沟通频率没有发生变化。实施干预后,住院医师认为患者护理更安全了(干预后早期,47%;干预后延迟,72%;P = 0.02),实习生对醒来和被指导医师批评的恐惧也减少了:结论:采用多模式方法制定并成功实施了护理升级方案。该方案的实施和推广规范了住院医师的夜间护理升级,提高了住院医师对患者安全的感知以及实习生对护理升级的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Implementation of an Escalation Protocol for Internal Medicine Trainees.

Background: Overnight, physicians in training receive less direct supervision. Decreased direct supervision requires trainees to appropriately assess patients at risk of clinical deterioration and escalate to supervising physicians. Failure of trainees to escalate contributes to adverse patient safety events.

Objective: To standardize the evaluation of patients at risk of deterioration overnight by internal medicine residents, increase communication between residents and supervising physicians, and improve perceptions of patient safety at a tertiary academic medical center.

Methods: A multidisciplinary stakeholder team developed an overnight escalation-of-care protocol for residents. The protocol was implemented with badge buddies and an educational campaign targeted at residents, supervising physicians, and nursing staff. Residents and supervising physicians completed anonymous surveys to assess the use of the protocol; the frequency of overnight communication between residents and supervising physicians; and perceptions of escalation and patient safety before, immediately after ("early postintervention"), and 8 months after ("delayed postintervention") the intervention.

Results: Seventy-five (100%) residents participated in the intervention, and 57-89% of those invited to complete surveys at the various time points responded. After the intervention, 82% of residents reported using the protocol, though no change was observed in the frequency of communication between residents and supervising physicians. After the implementation, residents perceived that patient care was safer (early postintervention, 47%; delayed postintervention, 72%; P = 0.02), and interns expressed decreased fear of waking and being criticized by supervising physicians.

Conclusion: An escalation-of-care protocol was developed and successfully implemented using a multimodal approach. The implementation and dissemination of the protocol standardized resident escalation overnight and improved resident-perceived patient safety and interns' comfort with escalation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信