面对社会、环境和健康影响的石油灾难和政府行动:范围审查

Romário Correia dos Santos, Aline do Monte Gurgel, Lucas lago Moura da Silva, Liliana Santos, R. F. Rêgo, I. G. D. Gurgel, M. O. S. D. Santos
{"title":"面对社会、环境和健康影响的石油灾难和政府行动:范围审查","authors":"Romário Correia dos Santos, Aline do Monte Gurgel, Lucas lago Moura da Silva, Liliana Santos, R. F. Rêgo, I. G. D. Gurgel, M. O. S. D. Santos","doi":"10.1590/0103-11042022e815i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the actions taken by governments to face the social, environmental, and health impacts of oil spill disasters worldwide. This scoping review was conducted in Bireme, Lilacs, SciELO, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, considering articles published between 1973 and 2021. The database search returned 22 articles on ten global oil disasters in three continents (Asia, the Americas, and Europe), whose causes were grounding (03), shipwreck (01), collision (02), spill (03), and explosion (01). The actions developed were characterized as intersectoral, economic, environmental, and health-related, and the most frequent were environmental and economic actions. In the actions developed, we observed criticisms of controlling, mitigating, or preventing instantaneous or future damages resulting from oil disasters, which is still an open agenda for social movements in the struggle to ensure a healthy, health-promoting environment that preserves all its biodiversity. The actions to face oil disasters in different countries seem incipient, revealing a governmental inability to guide the confrontation of the impacts of this unusual event.","PeriodicalId":31225,"journal":{"name":"Saude em Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oil disasters and government actions in the face of social, environmental, and health-related impacts: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Romário Correia dos Santos, Aline do Monte Gurgel, Lucas lago Moura da Silva, Liliana Santos, R. F. Rêgo, I. G. D. Gurgel, M. O. S. D. Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-11042022e815i\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the actions taken by governments to face the social, environmental, and health impacts of oil spill disasters worldwide. This scoping review was conducted in Bireme, Lilacs, SciELO, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, considering articles published between 1973 and 2021. The database search returned 22 articles on ten global oil disasters in three continents (Asia, the Americas, and Europe), whose causes were grounding (03), shipwreck (01), collision (02), spill (03), and explosion (01). The actions developed were characterized as intersectoral, economic, environmental, and health-related, and the most frequent were environmental and economic actions. In the actions developed, we observed criticisms of controlling, mitigating, or preventing instantaneous or future damages resulting from oil disasters, which is still an open agenda for social movements in the struggle to ensure a healthy, health-promoting environment that preserves all its biodiversity. The actions to face oil disasters in different countries seem incipient, revealing a governmental inability to guide the confrontation of the impacts of this unusual event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saude em Debate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saude em Debate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042022e815i\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042022e815i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析各国政府为应对全球石油泄漏灾难对社会、环境和健康的影响而采取的行动。本综述在Bireme、Lilacs、SciELO、PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库中进行,考虑了1973年至2021年间发表的文章。数据库搜索返回了22篇关于三大洲(亚洲、美洲和欧洲)10起全球石油灾难的文章,这些灾难的原因是搁浅(03)、海难(01)、碰撞(02)、泄漏(03)和爆炸(01)。所采取的行动具有部门间、经济、环境和与健康有关的特点,其中最常见的是环境和经济行动。在制定的行动中,我们注意到对控制、减轻或防止石油灾害造成的即时或未来损害的批评,这仍然是社会运动在努力确保一个保护其所有生物多样性的健康、促进健康的环境中的一个公开议程。各国应对石油灾难的行动似乎刚刚开始,这表明政府在应对这一不寻常事件的影响方面无能为力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oil disasters and government actions in the face of social, environmental, and health-related impacts: A scoping review
ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the actions taken by governments to face the social, environmental, and health impacts of oil spill disasters worldwide. This scoping review was conducted in Bireme, Lilacs, SciELO, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, considering articles published between 1973 and 2021. The database search returned 22 articles on ten global oil disasters in three continents (Asia, the Americas, and Europe), whose causes were grounding (03), shipwreck (01), collision (02), spill (03), and explosion (01). The actions developed were characterized as intersectoral, economic, environmental, and health-related, and the most frequent were environmental and economic actions. In the actions developed, we observed criticisms of controlling, mitigating, or preventing instantaneous or future damages resulting from oil disasters, which is still an open agenda for social movements in the struggle to ensure a healthy, health-promoting environment that preserves all its biodiversity. The actions to face oil disasters in different countries seem incipient, revealing a governmental inability to guide the confrontation of the impacts of this unusual event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信