Thomas Lampeter, Charles Love, Trien T Tang, Aditi S Marella, Hayden Y Lee, Armani Oganyan, Devin Moffat, Anisha Kareem, Matthew Rusling, Aubrey Massmann, Melanie Orr, Christian Bongiorno, Li-Lian Yuan
{"title":"用于肠道微生物组系统综述和荟萃分析的偏倚风险评估工具","authors":"Thomas Lampeter, Charles Love, Trien T Tang, Aditi S Marella, Hayden Y Lee, Armani Oganyan, Devin Moffat, Anisha Kareem, Matthew Rusling, Aubrey Massmann, Melanie Orr, Christian Bongiorno, Li-Lian Yuan","doi":"10.1017/gmb.2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk of bias assessment is a critical step of any meta-analysis or systematic review. Given the low sample count of many microbiome studies, especially observational or cohort studies involving human subjects, many microbiome studies have low power. This increases the importance of performing meta-analysis and systematic review for microbiome research in order to enhance the relevance and applicability of microbiome results. This work proposes a method based on the ROBINS-I tool to systematically consider sources of bias in microbiome research seeking to perform meta-analysis or systematic review for microbiome studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73187,"journal":{"name":"Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Lampeter, Charles Love, Trien T Tang, Aditi S Marella, Hayden Y Lee, Armani Oganyan, Devin Moffat, Anisha Kareem, Matthew Rusling, Aubrey Massmann, Melanie Orr, Christian Bongiorno, Li-Lian Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/gmb.2023.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Risk of bias assessment is a critical step of any meta-analysis or systematic review. Given the low sample count of many microbiome studies, especially observational or cohort studies involving human subjects, many microbiome studies have low power. This increases the importance of performing meta-analysis and systematic review for microbiome research in order to enhance the relevance and applicability of microbiome results. This work proposes a method based on the ROBINS-I tool to systematically consider sources of bias in microbiome research seeking to perform meta-analysis or systematic review for microbiome studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmb.2023.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmb.2023.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome.
Risk of bias assessment is a critical step of any meta-analysis or systematic review. Given the low sample count of many microbiome studies, especially observational or cohort studies involving human subjects, many microbiome studies have low power. This increases the importance of performing meta-analysis and systematic review for microbiome research in order to enhance the relevance and applicability of microbiome results. This work proposes a method based on the ROBINS-I tool to systematically consider sources of bias in microbiome research seeking to perform meta-analysis or systematic review for microbiome studies.