从煎蛋到土豆泥和扁豆:在全球南方背景下的民族志研究定位导航

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Md. Shajedur Rahman
{"title":"从煎蛋到土豆泥和扁豆:在全球南方背景下的民族志研究定位导航","authors":"Md. Shajedur Rahman","doi":"10.1080/1743727X.2023.2182876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current debates in the area of researchers’ positionalities criticize the notion of the ‘insider/outsider’ dichotomy and favour the idea of a fluid inbetweener position. However, these narratives foreground researchers’ perspectives and often ignore participants’ agency in constructing a researcher's positionality in the field. In this paper, as an early career researcher, I analyze my journey with my own positionalities in ethnographic research in a rural community in Bangladesh. Adopting a Critical Realist ontological standpoint, I argue that positionalities are co-constructed by researcher and participant and are products of complex interactions between their agencies and the social structure. I illustrate how reflexivity, taking both my and the participants’ views into account, facilitated my movement towards a position where the participants expose their habitual behaviour (not hesitating to offer their day-to-day food – mash potato) rather than providing superficial information (as they do to a guest, for whom they will at least fry an egg – a special arrangement – for dinner).","PeriodicalId":51655,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"408 - 420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From fried egg to mashed potato and lentils: navigating positionalities in ethnographic research in a global south context\",\"authors\":\"Md. Shajedur Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1743727X.2023.2182876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The current debates in the area of researchers’ positionalities criticize the notion of the ‘insider/outsider’ dichotomy and favour the idea of a fluid inbetweener position. However, these narratives foreground researchers’ perspectives and often ignore participants’ agency in constructing a researcher's positionality in the field. In this paper, as an early career researcher, I analyze my journey with my own positionalities in ethnographic research in a rural community in Bangladesh. Adopting a Critical Realist ontological standpoint, I argue that positionalities are co-constructed by researcher and participant and are products of complex interactions between their agencies and the social structure. I illustrate how reflexivity, taking both my and the participants’ views into account, facilitated my movement towards a position where the participants expose their habitual behaviour (not hesitating to offer their day-to-day food – mash potato) rather than providing superficial information (as they do to a guest, for whom they will at least fry an egg – a special arrangement – for dinner).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"408 - 420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2182876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2182876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前在研究人员的立场领域的争论批评了“内部/外部”二分法的概念,并赞成流动的中间位置的想法。然而,这些叙述突出了研究者的观点,往往忽略了参与者在构建研究者在该领域的地位时的代理作用。在本文中,作为一个早期的职业研究者,我分析了我的旅程与我自己的定位在一个农村社区的民族志研究在孟加拉国。采用批判现实主义本体论的观点,我认为位置是由研究者和参与者共同构建的,是他们的代理和社会结构之间复杂互动的产物。我举例说明,考虑到我和参与者的观点,反射性如何促进了我的行动,让参与者暴露他们的习惯行为(毫不犹豫地提供他们的日常食物——土豆泥),而不是提供肤浅的信息(就像他们对客人所做的那样,他们至少会为客人煎一个鸡蛋——一种特殊的安排——作为晚餐)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From fried egg to mashed potato and lentils: navigating positionalities in ethnographic research in a global south context
ABSTRACT The current debates in the area of researchers’ positionalities criticize the notion of the ‘insider/outsider’ dichotomy and favour the idea of a fluid inbetweener position. However, these narratives foreground researchers’ perspectives and often ignore participants’ agency in constructing a researcher's positionality in the field. In this paper, as an early career researcher, I analyze my journey with my own positionalities in ethnographic research in a rural community in Bangladesh. Adopting a Critical Realist ontological standpoint, I argue that positionalities are co-constructed by researcher and participant and are products of complex interactions between their agencies and the social structure. I illustrate how reflexivity, taking both my and the participants’ views into account, facilitated my movement towards a position where the participants expose their habitual behaviour (not hesitating to offer their day-to-day food – mash potato) rather than providing superficial information (as they do to a guest, for whom they will at least fry an egg – a special arrangement – for dinner).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research & Method in Education is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that draws contributions from a wide community of international researchers. Contributions are expected to develop and further international discourse in educational research with a particular focus on method and methodological issues. The journal welcomes papers engaging with methods from within a qualitative or quantitative framework, or from frameworks which cut across and or challenge this duality. Papers should not solely focus on the practice of education; there must be a contribution to methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education is committed to publishing scholarly research that discusses conceptual, theoretical and methodological issues, provides evidence, support for or informed critique of unusual or new methodologies within educational research and provides innovative, new perspectives and examinations of key research findings. The journal’s enthusiasm to foster debate is also recognised in a keenness to include engaged, thought-provoking response papers to previously published articles. The journal is also interested in papers that discuss issues in the teaching of research methods for educational researchers. Contributors to International Journal of Research & Method in Education should take care to communicate their findings or arguments in a succinct, accessible manner to an international readership of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners from a range of disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, and history of education. The Co-Editors welcome suggested topics for future Special Issues. Initial ideas should be discussed by email with the Co-Editors before a formal proposal is submitted for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信