西班牙对IAMCEST关注的地区差异。ACI-SEC心脏病代码寄存器数据

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
O. Rodríguez-Leor, Ana Belén Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, Ana Serrador, R. López-Palop, Javier Martín-Moreiras, José Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, B. Ibáñez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras y, Armando Pérez de Prado
{"title":"西班牙对IAMCEST关注的地区差异。ACI-SEC心脏病代码寄存器数据","authors":"O. Rodríguez-Leor, Ana Belén Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, Ana Serrador, R. López-Palop, Javier Martín-Moreiras, José Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, B. Ibáñez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras y, Armando Pérez de Prado","doi":"10.24875/recic.m22000360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC (P < .0001), as was gender (P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences (P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.","PeriodicalId":34295,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diferencias regionales en la atenci�n al IAMCEST en Espa�a. Datos del Registro de C�digo Infarto ACI-SEC\",\"authors\":\"O. Rodríguez-Leor, Ana Belén Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, Ana Serrador, R. López-Palop, Javier Martín-Moreiras, José Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, B. Ibáñez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras y, Armando Pérez de Prado\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/recic.m22000360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC (P < .0001), as was gender (P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences (P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/recic.m22000360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recic.m22000360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的:不同自治社区(AC)之间的地理和组织差异会导致ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的护理差异。共有17个心脏病发作代码程序在发病率、临床特征、再灌注治疗、再灌注延迟和30天死亡率方面进行了比较。方法:全国前瞻性观察性研究(包括17个梗死网络中的83个中心)。招募期为3个月(2019年4月1日至6月30日),临床随访30天。结果:纳入4366例STEMI患者。不同AC的发病率(P<0.0001)、性别(P=.003)和心血管危险因素的患病率(P>0.0001)各不相同。再灌注治疗为原发性血管成形术(范围77.5%-97.8%),纤维蛋白溶解(范围0%-12.9%)或不治疗(范围2.2%13.5%)。对再灌注延迟的分析显示,所有分析的时间间隔都有显著差异(P<.001)。在调整临床和医疗保健网络特征后,30天死亡率有显著差异,但这些差异消失了。结论:在发病率、临床特征、再灌注治疗、延迟再灌注和30天死亡率方面,不同AC之间的STEMI护理存在很大差异。在根据患者和护理网络的特点进行调整后,死亡率的差异消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diferencias regionales en la atenci�n al IAMCEST en Espa�a. Datos del Registro de C�digo Infarto ACI-SEC
Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC (P < .0001), as was gender (P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences (P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology
REC Interventional Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信