供应链中断和采购策略

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Julia Cajal-Grossi , Davide Del Prete , Rocco Macchiavello
{"title":"供应链中断和采购策略","authors":"Julia Cajal-Grossi ,&nbsp;Davide Del Prete ,&nbsp;Rocco Macchiavello","doi":"10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.103004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Supply chain disruptions have recently been at the center of both academic and policy debates. After reviewing some of the emerging literature on supply chain disruptions, we discuss the role of buyers' sourcing strategies in mediating responses to such shocks. We focus on two dimensions of a buyer's sourcing strategy: <em>relationality</em> (the extent to which the buyer concentrates its sourcing in a few core suppliers) and <em>just-in-time</em>. On the one hand, theoretical models of sourcing suggest that these are complementary practices and their adoption should be positively correlated in the data. On the other hand, the two dimensions have opposing implications for supply-chain resilience to shocks. We borrow an empirical proxy for a buyer's <em>relationality</em> from <span>Cajal-Grossi et al. (2023)</span> and introduce a new proxy for a buyer's adoption of <em>just-in-time</em> inventory systems. Using data from the apparel global value chain we compute the two proxies and present three results: (a) the variation in both <em>relationality</em> and <em>just-in-time</em> is mostly explained by across-buyer variation, rather than product or country variation, (b) consistent with the theoretical analysis in <span>Taylor and Wiggins (1997)</span>, <em>relationality</em> and <em>just-in-time</em> are highly correlated with each other across buyers, (c) at the onset of the global Covid-19 pandemic, buyers' overall sourced values declined relatively less for <em>relational</em> buyers but not for buyers with <em>just-in-time</em> inventory systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply chain disruptions and sourcing strategies\",\"authors\":\"Julia Cajal-Grossi ,&nbsp;Davide Del Prete ,&nbsp;Rocco Macchiavello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.103004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Supply chain disruptions have recently been at the center of both academic and policy debates. After reviewing some of the emerging literature on supply chain disruptions, we discuss the role of buyers' sourcing strategies in mediating responses to such shocks. We focus on two dimensions of a buyer's sourcing strategy: <em>relationality</em> (the extent to which the buyer concentrates its sourcing in a few core suppliers) and <em>just-in-time</em>. On the one hand, theoretical models of sourcing suggest that these are complementary practices and their adoption should be positively correlated in the data. On the other hand, the two dimensions have opposing implications for supply-chain resilience to shocks. We borrow an empirical proxy for a buyer's <em>relationality</em> from <span>Cajal-Grossi et al. (2023)</span> and introduce a new proxy for a buyer's adoption of <em>just-in-time</em> inventory systems. Using data from the apparel global value chain we compute the two proxies and present three results: (a) the variation in both <em>relationality</em> and <em>just-in-time</em> is mostly explained by across-buyer variation, rather than product or country variation, (b) consistent with the theoretical analysis in <span>Taylor and Wiggins (1997)</span>, <em>relationality</em> and <em>just-in-time</em> are highly correlated with each other across buyers, (c) at the onset of the global Covid-19 pandemic, buyers' overall sourced values declined relatively less for <em>relational</em> buyers but not for buyers with <em>just-in-time</em> inventory systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167718723000851\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167718723000851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近,供应链中断一直是学术和政策辩论的中心问题。在回顾了一些关于供应链中断的新兴文献后,我们讨论了买家采购策略在应对此类冲击中的作用。我们关注买家采购策略的两个维度:关系(买家将采购集中在几个核心供应商的程度)和准时制。一方面,采购的理论模型表明,这些是互补的做法,他们的采用应该是正相关的数据。另一方面,这两个维度对供应链抵御冲击的能力有着相反的影响。我们从Cajal-Grossi等人(2023)那里借用了买方关系的经验代理,并引入了买方采用即时库存系统的新代理。利用来自服装全球价值链的数据,我们计算了这两个代理,并给出了三个结果:(a)相关性和准时性的变化主要由购买者之间的变化而不是产品或国家的变化来解释;(b)与Taylor和Wiggins(1997)的理论分析一致,相关性和准时性在购买者之间相互高度相关;(c)在全球Covid-19大流行开始时,相关性购买者的总体采购价值下降相对较小,而具有准时库存系统的购买者则没有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supply chain disruptions and sourcing strategies

Supply chain disruptions have recently been at the center of both academic and policy debates. After reviewing some of the emerging literature on supply chain disruptions, we discuss the role of buyers' sourcing strategies in mediating responses to such shocks. We focus on two dimensions of a buyer's sourcing strategy: relationality (the extent to which the buyer concentrates its sourcing in a few core suppliers) and just-in-time. On the one hand, theoretical models of sourcing suggest that these are complementary practices and their adoption should be positively correlated in the data. On the other hand, the two dimensions have opposing implications for supply-chain resilience to shocks. We borrow an empirical proxy for a buyer's relationality from Cajal-Grossi et al. (2023) and introduce a new proxy for a buyer's adoption of just-in-time inventory systems. Using data from the apparel global value chain we compute the two proxies and present three results: (a) the variation in both relationality and just-in-time is mostly explained by across-buyer variation, rather than product or country variation, (b) consistent with the theoretical analysis in Taylor and Wiggins (1997), relationality and just-in-time are highly correlated with each other across buyers, (c) at the onset of the global Covid-19 pandemic, buyers' overall sourced values declined relatively less for relational buyers but not for buyers with just-in-time inventory systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信