教师竞赛中的葡萄牙语测试:矛盾/教师竞赛葡萄牙语考试:胡说八道?

IF 0.1
Ondina Maria da Silva Macedo, Eliane Márquez Fonseca Fernandes
{"title":"教师竞赛中的葡萄牙语测试:矛盾/教师竞赛葡萄牙语考试:胡说八道?","authors":"Ondina Maria da Silva Macedo, Eliane Márquez Fonseca Fernandes","doi":"10.17851/2238-3824.26.1.27-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text is an excerpt from the doctoral thesis and it aims to analyse the theoretical questionnaire about the knowledge of Portuguese language in the construction of a Portuguese Language (PL) exam applied to candidates in the contest for professor of sociology at the Federal Institute of São Paulo (IFSP, in Portuguese), in 2015. The theoretical basis is the Dialogic Discourse Analysis with Bakhtin (2003, 2010) and Orlandi (2001, 2007). It is questioned the descriptive character of the test, which was focused on formal aspects, at the expense of the discussion of the possible meanings of language use, as recommended by the National Curriculum Parameters (PCN, in Portuguese) and the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC, in Portuguese). This research follows qualitative methodology, a documentary nature, starting from the materiality of the statements of the PL test, with focus on social practices. It is important to emphasize that in 2018, three years later the previously mentioned contest, the IFSP applied tests to candidates with the same background, reframing the evaluation so as not to consider only grammatical aspects.","PeriodicalId":40506,"journal":{"name":"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos","volume":"26 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prova de língua portuguesa em concursos para docentes: um contrassenso? / Portuguese Language Exam inTeachers Contest: A Nonsense?\",\"authors\":\"Ondina Maria da Silva Macedo, Eliane Márquez Fonseca Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.17851/2238-3824.26.1.27-44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text is an excerpt from the doctoral thesis and it aims to analyse the theoretical questionnaire about the knowledge of Portuguese language in the construction of a Portuguese Language (PL) exam applied to candidates in the contest for professor of sociology at the Federal Institute of São Paulo (IFSP, in Portuguese), in 2015. The theoretical basis is the Dialogic Discourse Analysis with Bakhtin (2003, 2010) and Orlandi (2001, 2007). It is questioned the descriptive character of the test, which was focused on formal aspects, at the expense of the discussion of the possible meanings of language use, as recommended by the National Curriculum Parameters (PCN, in Portuguese) and the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC, in Portuguese). This research follows qualitative methodology, a documentary nature, starting from the materiality of the statements of the PL test, with focus on social practices. It is important to emphasize that in 2018, three years later the previously mentioned contest, the IFSP applied tests to candidates with the same background, reframing the evaluation so as not to consider only grammatical aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17851/2238-3824.26.1.27-44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17851/2238-3824.26.1.27-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文摘录自博士论文,旨在分析2015年圣保罗联邦学院(IFSP,葡萄牙语)社会学教授竞选候选人在葡萄牙语(PL)考试中的葡萄牙语知识理论问卷。理论基础是与巴赫金(20032010)和奥兰迪(20012007)的对话话语分析。根据国家课程参数(PCN,葡萄牙语)和国家通用课程库(BNCC,葡萄牙语)的建议,该测试侧重于形式方面,而忽视了对语言使用可能含义的讨论。本研究遵循定性方法论,具有文献性质,从PL测试陈述的实质性开始,重点关注社会实践。需要强调的是,在2018年,也就是之前提到的比赛三年后,国际单项体育联合会对具有相同背景的考生进行了测试,重新制定了评估,以免只考虑语法方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prova de língua portuguesa em concursos para docentes: um contrassenso? / Portuguese Language Exam inTeachers Contest: A Nonsense?
This text is an excerpt from the doctoral thesis and it aims to analyse the theoretical questionnaire about the knowledge of Portuguese language in the construction of a Portuguese Language (PL) exam applied to candidates in the contest for professor of sociology at the Federal Institute of São Paulo (IFSP, in Portuguese), in 2015. The theoretical basis is the Dialogic Discourse Analysis with Bakhtin (2003, 2010) and Orlandi (2001, 2007). It is questioned the descriptive character of the test, which was focused on formal aspects, at the expense of the discussion of the possible meanings of language use, as recommended by the National Curriculum Parameters (PCN, in Portuguese) and the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC, in Portuguese). This research follows qualitative methodology, a documentary nature, starting from the materiality of the statements of the PL test, with focus on social practices. It is important to emphasize that in 2018, three years later the previously mentioned contest, the IFSP applied tests to candidates with the same background, reframing the evaluation so as not to consider only grammatical aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信