世界历史与社会进化:历史时期与心理阶段

Q3 Arts and Humanities
G. Oesterdiekhoff, G. Vonderach
{"title":"世界历史与社会进化:历史时期与心理阶段","authors":"G. Oesterdiekhoff, G. Vonderach","doi":"10.46469/MQ.2021.61.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay combines historical research with developmental psychology and Piagetian Cross-Cultural Psychology. It will be shown that the empirical data that evidence major psychological differences between premodern and modern peoples can be applied to the study of history generally. The differences in mind, language, worldview, religion, literature, and sciences between pre-civilized peoples, archaic kingdoms, ancient civilizations, and modern industrial society can be connected to distinct differences in developmental stage. Data are presented that reveal a continuous rise in the final cognitive stage of adults through the four historical periods. Ancient Egypt lies in the middle between nature peoples and post-axial civilizations, in terms of developmental stages. The post-axial civilizations again are more developed than the archaic kingdoms, but less than modern industrial civilization. Stages of cognitive development can help us understand the distinctions of cultural development that historians make when comparing these cultures. Indeed, such a developmental approach may revolutionize the study of history.","PeriodicalId":35516,"journal":{"name":"Mankind Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"820-853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"World History and Societal Evolution: Historical Periods and Psychological Stages\",\"authors\":\"G. Oesterdiekhoff, G. Vonderach\",\"doi\":\"10.46469/MQ.2021.61.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay combines historical research with developmental psychology and Piagetian Cross-Cultural Psychology. It will be shown that the empirical data that evidence major psychological differences between premodern and modern peoples can be applied to the study of history generally. The differences in mind, language, worldview, religion, literature, and sciences between pre-civilized peoples, archaic kingdoms, ancient civilizations, and modern industrial society can be connected to distinct differences in developmental stage. Data are presented that reveal a continuous rise in the final cognitive stage of adults through the four historical periods. Ancient Egypt lies in the middle between nature peoples and post-axial civilizations, in terms of developmental stages. The post-axial civilizations again are more developed than the archaic kingdoms, but less than modern industrial civilization. Stages of cognitive development can help us understand the distinctions of cultural development that historians make when comparing these cultures. Indeed, such a developmental approach may revolutionize the study of history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mankind Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"820-853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mankind Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46469/MQ.2021.61.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mankind Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46469/MQ.2021.61.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将历史研究与发展心理学和皮亚杰跨文化心理学相结合。这将表明,证明前现代人和现代人之间存在重大心理差异的经验数据可以普遍应用于历史研究。前文明国家、古代王国、古代文明和现代工业社会在思想、语言、世界观、宗教、文学和科学方面的差异可以与发展阶段的明显差异联系起来。所提供的数据显示,在四个历史时期,成年人的最后认知阶段持续上升。就发展阶段而言,古埃及位于自然民族和后轴心文明之间。后轴心文明再次比古代王国更发达,但比现代工业文明更少。认知发展阶段可以帮助我们理解历史学家在比较这些文化时对文化发展的区别。事实上,这种发展方法可能会彻底改变历史研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
World History and Societal Evolution: Historical Periods and Psychological Stages
This essay combines historical research with developmental psychology and Piagetian Cross-Cultural Psychology. It will be shown that the empirical data that evidence major psychological differences between premodern and modern peoples can be applied to the study of history generally. The differences in mind, language, worldview, religion, literature, and sciences between pre-civilized peoples, archaic kingdoms, ancient civilizations, and modern industrial society can be connected to distinct differences in developmental stage. Data are presented that reveal a continuous rise in the final cognitive stage of adults through the four historical periods. Ancient Egypt lies in the middle between nature peoples and post-axial civilizations, in terms of developmental stages. The post-axial civilizations again are more developed than the archaic kingdoms, but less than modern industrial civilization. Stages of cognitive development can help us understand the distinctions of cultural development that historians make when comparing these cultures. Indeed, such a developmental approach may revolutionize the study of history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mankind Quarterly
Mankind Quarterly Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Mankind Quarterly was founded as a quarterly journal of anthropology, in the broadest sense of "the science of man," in 1961. This was a time when the "study of man" had already diversified into physical anthropology, ethnography, quantitative cross-cultural research, archaeology and other subspecialties. Psychological and linguistic approaches were explored but the genetic study of population structure and population history was still in its infancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信