{"title":"价格指数质量调整方法的交叉验证","authors":"Brian J. Adams, Alexander Klayman","doi":"10.21916/MLR.2018.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Price index programs may use several quality-adjustment methods, but they often lack guidance on when to use a given method. As part of an effort to improve quality adjustment for network switches in the Producer Price Index, we compare some standard quality-adjustment methods, using cross-validation. For our sample, seemingly reasonable hedonic specifications impute outof-sample prices less accurately than other, traditional quality-adjustment methods.","PeriodicalId":47215,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Labor Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-validation of quality-adjustment methods for price indexes\",\"authors\":\"Brian J. Adams, Alexander Klayman\",\"doi\":\"10.21916/MLR.2018.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Price index programs may use several quality-adjustment methods, but they often lack guidance on when to use a given method. As part of an effort to improve quality adjustment for network switches in the Producer Price Index, we compare some standard quality-adjustment methods, using cross-validation. For our sample, seemingly reasonable hedonic specifications impute outof-sample prices less accurately than other, traditional quality-adjustment methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Labor Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Labor Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21916/MLR.2018.18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Labor Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21916/MLR.2018.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-validation of quality-adjustment methods for price indexes
Price index programs may use several quality-adjustment methods, but they often lack guidance on when to use a given method. As part of an effort to improve quality adjustment for network switches in the Producer Price Index, we compare some standard quality-adjustment methods, using cross-validation. For our sample, seemingly reasonable hedonic specifications impute outof-sample prices less accurately than other, traditional quality-adjustment methods.