女权主义/可见性:用照片证据监管家庭暴力时的同意问题

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 ART
Beth A. Uzwiak
{"title":"女权主义/可见性:用照片证据监管家庭暴力时的同意问题","authors":"Beth A. Uzwiak","doi":"10.1080/03087298.2022.2105550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"US feminist grassroots organising of the 1960s positioned its critique of domestic violence within a social analysis of class, race, sexuality and gender. In subsequent decades, feminist organising largely shifted to service provision which brought collusion with state entities and police in the quest to criminalise domestic violence. Criminalisation introduced a demand for corroborative evidence including the use of photographs to ‘prove’ violence as enacted on victims’ bodies. Through a consideration of the history of domestic violence photography and ethnographic data gathered with women residing in a domestic violence shelter, I explore how domestic violence photographs can reinforce entrenched gendered and racialised inequities and engender new ones. In many states, evidence-based prosecution does not rely on victim testimony and can be used without the consent of the harmed person. Rather than simply a mechanism of state control, however, the meaning and utility of evidentiary photographs remain unstable. Ethnographic data suggest that photographs and videos of domestic violence reverberate within and beyond the logics of state violence. I argue that photographic consent emerges as a vector to consider alternatives to criminal prosecution via policing.","PeriodicalId":13024,"journal":{"name":"History of Photography","volume":"45 1","pages":"388 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminist In/Visibilities: Questions of Consent when Policing Domestic Violence with Photographic Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Beth A. Uzwiak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03087298.2022.2105550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"US feminist grassroots organising of the 1960s positioned its critique of domestic violence within a social analysis of class, race, sexuality and gender. In subsequent decades, feminist organising largely shifted to service provision which brought collusion with state entities and police in the quest to criminalise domestic violence. Criminalisation introduced a demand for corroborative evidence including the use of photographs to ‘prove’ violence as enacted on victims’ bodies. Through a consideration of the history of domestic violence photography and ethnographic data gathered with women residing in a domestic violence shelter, I explore how domestic violence photographs can reinforce entrenched gendered and racialised inequities and engender new ones. In many states, evidence-based prosecution does not rely on victim testimony and can be used without the consent of the harmed person. Rather than simply a mechanism of state control, however, the meaning and utility of evidentiary photographs remain unstable. Ethnographic data suggest that photographs and videos of domestic violence reverberate within and beyond the logics of state violence. I argue that photographic consent emerges as a vector to consider alternatives to criminal prosecution via policing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Photography\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"388 - 398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Photography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2022.2105550\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Photography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2022.2105550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪60年代的美国女权主义基层组织将其对家庭暴力的批评定位在阶级、种族、性和性别的社会分析中。在随后的几十年里,女权组织在很大程度上转向了提供服务,与国家实体和警察勾结,寻求将家庭暴力定为刑事犯罪。刑事定罪引入了对确凿证据的要求,包括使用照片来“证明”对受害者身体施加的暴力。通过考虑家庭暴力摄影的历史和从居住在家庭暴力庇护所的妇女收集的人种学数据,我探讨了家庭暴力照片如何加强根深蒂固的性别和种族不平等,并产生新的不平等。在许多州,以证据为基础的起诉不依赖于受害者的证词,可以在未经受害方同意的情况下使用。然而,证据照片的意义和效用仍然不稳定,而不仅仅是一种国家控制机制。人种学数据表明,家庭暴力的照片和视频在国家暴力的逻辑内外都有回响。我认为,摄影同意作为一种载体出现,以考虑通过警务进行刑事起诉的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feminist In/Visibilities: Questions of Consent when Policing Domestic Violence with Photographic Evidence
US feminist grassroots organising of the 1960s positioned its critique of domestic violence within a social analysis of class, race, sexuality and gender. In subsequent decades, feminist organising largely shifted to service provision which brought collusion with state entities and police in the quest to criminalise domestic violence. Criminalisation introduced a demand for corroborative evidence including the use of photographs to ‘prove’ violence as enacted on victims’ bodies. Through a consideration of the history of domestic violence photography and ethnographic data gathered with women residing in a domestic violence shelter, I explore how domestic violence photographs can reinforce entrenched gendered and racialised inequities and engender new ones. In many states, evidence-based prosecution does not rely on victim testimony and can be used without the consent of the harmed person. Rather than simply a mechanism of state control, however, the meaning and utility of evidentiary photographs remain unstable. Ethnographic data suggest that photographs and videos of domestic violence reverberate within and beyond the logics of state violence. I argue that photographic consent emerges as a vector to consider alternatives to criminal prosecution via policing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: History of Photography is an international quarterly devoted to the history, practice and theory of photography. It intends to address all aspects of the medium, treating the processes, circulation, functions, and reception of photography in all its aspects, including documentary, popular and polemical work as well as fine art photography. The goal of the journal is to be inclusive and interdisciplinary in nature, welcoming all scholarly approaches, whether archival, historical, art historical, anthropological, sociological or theoretical. It is intended also to embrace world photography, ranging from Europe and the Americas to the Far East.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信