Andile Dyalvane、Juliet Armstrong和Kim Bagley的《自我/他人/粘土/皮肤:陶瓷反思》

IF 0.1 0 ART
K. Bagley
{"title":"Andile Dyalvane、Juliet Armstrong和Kim Bagley的《自我/他人/粘土/皮肤:陶瓷反思》","authors":"K. Bagley","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2020.1829356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This reflection on practice develops the idea of a skin metaphor in the work of a selection of contemporary South African artists working in clay. In particular, it discusses selected works by Juliet Armstrong and Andile Dyalvane in relation to the author's own practice. The author proposes that body- and skin-like forms can speak about how we see ourselves and others within post-apartheid South African cultural contexts. Themes discussed in relation to ceramic works include cultural appropriation, the anxieties of whiteness, and cultural identities. The article covers works produced at least ten years after the pivotal democratic elections in 1994 that symbolise the end of the socially and economically damaging apartheid regime. With this in mind, all of these works can be interpreted as part of an (admittedly flawed) project of slowly healing our metaphorical skin, in which South African artists have grappled with cultural and human identities from a range of highly individual perspectives. In engaging with their works, we are better able to understand specific local human conditions.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"55 1","pages":"4 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2020.1829356","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self/Other/Clay/Skin: Reflections on Ceramics by Andile Dyalvane, Juliet Armstrong, and Kim Bagley\",\"authors\":\"K. Bagley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043389.2020.1829356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This reflection on practice develops the idea of a skin metaphor in the work of a selection of contemporary South African artists working in clay. In particular, it discusses selected works by Juliet Armstrong and Andile Dyalvane in relation to the author's own practice. The author proposes that body- and skin-like forms can speak about how we see ourselves and others within post-apartheid South African cultural contexts. Themes discussed in relation to ceramic works include cultural appropriation, the anxieties of whiteness, and cultural identities. The article covers works produced at least ten years after the pivotal democratic elections in 1994 that symbolise the end of the socially and economically damaging apartheid regime. With this in mind, all of these works can be interpreted as part of an (admittedly flawed) project of slowly healing our metaphorical skin, in which South African artists have grappled with cultural and human identities from a range of highly individual perspectives. In engaging with their works, we are better able to understand specific local human conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Arte\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2020.1829356\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Arte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2020.1829356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2020.1829356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要这种对实践的反思在当代南非粘土艺术家的作品中发展了皮肤隐喻的概念。特别是,结合作者自身的实践,对朱丽叶·阿姆斯特朗和安迪勒·达尔万的作品选集进行了探讨。作者提出,类似身体和皮肤的形式可以说明我们在后种族隔离的南非文化背景下如何看待自己和他人。与陶瓷作品相关的主题包括文化挪用、对白人的焦虑和文化身份。这篇文章涵盖了1994年关键的民主选举后至少十年创作的作品,这些作品象征着破坏社会和经济的种族隔离制度的结束。考虑到这一点,所有这些作品都可以被解释为一个缓慢治愈我们隐喻性皮肤的项目(诚然有缺陷)的一部分,在这个项目中,南非艺术家从一系列高度个人化的角度与文化和人类身份作斗争。通过参与他们的作品,我们能够更好地了解当地的具体人文条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self/Other/Clay/Skin: Reflections on Ceramics by Andile Dyalvane, Juliet Armstrong, and Kim Bagley
Abstract This reflection on practice develops the idea of a skin metaphor in the work of a selection of contemporary South African artists working in clay. In particular, it discusses selected works by Juliet Armstrong and Andile Dyalvane in relation to the author's own practice. The author proposes that body- and skin-like forms can speak about how we see ourselves and others within post-apartheid South African cultural contexts. Themes discussed in relation to ceramic works include cultural appropriation, the anxieties of whiteness, and cultural identities. The article covers works produced at least ten years after the pivotal democratic elections in 1994 that symbolise the end of the socially and economically damaging apartheid regime. With this in mind, all of these works can be interpreted as part of an (admittedly flawed) project of slowly healing our metaphorical skin, in which South African artists have grappled with cultural and human identities from a range of highly individual perspectives. In engaging with their works, we are better able to understand specific local human conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
De Arte
De Arte ART-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信