{"title":"使用成像毛细管等电聚焦对贝伐单抗生物类似物制剂电荷变体的相似性评估","authors":"A. Bana, P. Mehta","doi":"10.1080/10826076.2022.2072329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The imaged capillary isoelectric focusing method was developed and validated for charge variant analysis of the bevacizumab innovator product and its biosimilar formulations (N = 2). The optimized method consists of; 4 M urea, 2.0 mM iminodiacetic acid, 0.35% m/v methylcellulose, 5.0 mM L-arginine, 4.0% v/v carrier ampholytes (narrow-range isoelectric point 5–8 and 8–10.5 with ratio of 1:3), 60 mM sodium hydroxide and 30 mM phosphoric acid as catholyte and anolyte solutions. The bevacizumab innovator and biosimilars formulations were observed with two acidic peaks followed by the main peak and two basic peaks. The validation of the developed method was done by performing intraday (n = 6) and interday (n = 9) precision studies with observed RSD < 2.0%. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of the developed method was found to be 0.016 and 0.048 mg mL−1. The charge variant profiles observed for innovator and biosimilar formulations (N = 2) were then applied for statistical comparison using one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test. This study can serve as a reference to biosimilar manufacturers and startups on how to assess the charge variant profiles of bevacizumab during the manufacturing process. Graphical Abstract","PeriodicalId":16295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similarity assessment of charge variants for bevacizumab biosimilar formulations using imaged capillary isoelectric focusing\",\"authors\":\"A. Bana, P. Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826076.2022.2072329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The imaged capillary isoelectric focusing method was developed and validated for charge variant analysis of the bevacizumab innovator product and its biosimilar formulations (N = 2). The optimized method consists of; 4 M urea, 2.0 mM iminodiacetic acid, 0.35% m/v methylcellulose, 5.0 mM L-arginine, 4.0% v/v carrier ampholytes (narrow-range isoelectric point 5–8 and 8–10.5 with ratio of 1:3), 60 mM sodium hydroxide and 30 mM phosphoric acid as catholyte and anolyte solutions. The bevacizumab innovator and biosimilars formulations were observed with two acidic peaks followed by the main peak and two basic peaks. The validation of the developed method was done by performing intraday (n = 6) and interday (n = 9) precision studies with observed RSD < 2.0%. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of the developed method was found to be 0.016 and 0.048 mg mL−1. The charge variant profiles observed for innovator and biosimilar formulations (N = 2) were then applied for statistical comparison using one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test. This study can serve as a reference to biosimilar manufacturers and startups on how to assess the charge variant profiles of bevacizumab during the manufacturing process. Graphical Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":16295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2022.2072329\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2022.2072329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Similarity assessment of charge variants for bevacizumab biosimilar formulations using imaged capillary isoelectric focusing
Abstract The imaged capillary isoelectric focusing method was developed and validated for charge variant analysis of the bevacizumab innovator product and its biosimilar formulations (N = 2). The optimized method consists of; 4 M urea, 2.0 mM iminodiacetic acid, 0.35% m/v methylcellulose, 5.0 mM L-arginine, 4.0% v/v carrier ampholytes (narrow-range isoelectric point 5–8 and 8–10.5 with ratio of 1:3), 60 mM sodium hydroxide and 30 mM phosphoric acid as catholyte and anolyte solutions. The bevacizumab innovator and biosimilars formulations were observed with two acidic peaks followed by the main peak and two basic peaks. The validation of the developed method was done by performing intraday (n = 6) and interday (n = 9) precision studies with observed RSD < 2.0%. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of the developed method was found to be 0.016 and 0.048 mg mL−1. The charge variant profiles observed for innovator and biosimilar formulations (N = 2) were then applied for statistical comparison using one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test. This study can serve as a reference to biosimilar manufacturers and startups on how to assess the charge variant profiles of bevacizumab during the manufacturing process. Graphical Abstract
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies is an internationally acclaimed forum for fast publication of critical, peer reviewed manuscripts dealing with analytical, preparative and process scale liquid chromatography and all of its related technologies, including TLC, capillary electrophoresis, capillary electrochromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography and extraction, field-flow technologies, affinity, and much more. New separation methodologies are added when they are developed. Papers dealing with research and development results, as well as critical reviews of important technologies, are published in the Journal.