{"title":"中国早期的金属农具","authors":"Lothar von Falkenhausen","doi":"10.1086/721219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article summarizes the current state of the discussion on the use of metal agricultural implements in China during the one and a half millennia preceding the Qin unification in 221 BCE. Agriculture-related archaeological evidence is far scanter and less representative than the evidence now available on such aspects of early Chinese culture as social organization and ritual. Even so, a general trend toward the increased use of metal implements seems to be incontrovertible, especially after the switch from bronze to iron in the middle of the first millennium BCE.","PeriodicalId":53917,"journal":{"name":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metal Agricultural Implements in Early China\",\"authors\":\"Lothar von Falkenhausen\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article summarizes the current state of the discussion on the use of metal agricultural implements in China during the one and a half millennia preceding the Qin unification in 221 BCE. Agriculture-related archaeological evidence is far scanter and less representative than the evidence now available on such aspects of early Chinese culture as social organization and ritual. Even so, a general trend toward the increased use of metal implements seems to be incontrovertible, especially after the switch from bronze to iron in the middle of the first millennium BCE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article summarizes the current state of the discussion on the use of metal agricultural implements in China during the one and a half millennia preceding the Qin unification in 221 BCE. Agriculture-related archaeological evidence is far scanter and less representative than the evidence now available on such aspects of early Chinese culture as social organization and ritual. Even so, a general trend toward the increased use of metal implements seems to be incontrovertible, especially after the switch from bronze to iron in the middle of the first millennium BCE.