睾丸激素和皮质醇是否与青少年支配力有关?双激素假说的预登记多方法质疑

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Allison N. Shields, Cassandra M. Brandes, Kathleen W. Reardon, Raul A. España, Jennifer L. Tackett
{"title":"睾丸激素和皮质醇是否与青少年支配力有关?双激素假说的预登记多方法质疑","authors":"Allison N. Shields,&nbsp;Cassandra M. Brandes,&nbsp;Kathleen W. Reardon,&nbsp;Raul A. España,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Tackett","doi":"10.1007/s40750-021-00167-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of the present study was to extend the findings of the dual-hormone hypothesis (DHH) literature by assessing whether the interaction between testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) is associated with dominance in an adolescent sample via multiple methods of measuring T, C, and dominance, and with pre-registration of hypotheses and analyses.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a sample of 337 adolescents (<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 14.98, <i>SD</i> = 1.51; 191 girls) and their caregivers, hormonal assays were obtained from hair and saliva, and dominance behavior was assessed across four operationalizations (behavioral ratings in a leadership task, self- and caregiver reported dominance motivations, and self-reported social potency).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>T and C main effects were generally null across hormone and dominance operationalizations, except that observer-rated dominance was negatively associated with salivary T, and social potency was positively associated with salivary T and negatively associated with salivary C. Support for the DHH was weak. Point estimates reflected a small negative T × C interaction for behavioral ratings of dominance, consistent with the DHH, whereas interaction effects for report-based dominance measures were close to zero or positive.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results contribute to a growing evidence base suggesting T × C interaction effects are variable across measures and methods used to assess hormones and dominance and highlight the need for comprehensive, multi-method examinations employing best practices in scientific openness and transparency to reduce uncertainty in estimates. Measurement of hormones and dominance outcomes vary across labs and studies, and the largely null results should be considered in that context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7178,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","volume":"7 2","pages":"183 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40750-021-00167-3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Relate to Adolescent Dominance? A Pre-registered Multi-method Interrogation of the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Allison N. Shields,&nbsp;Cassandra M. Brandes,&nbsp;Kathleen W. Reardon,&nbsp;Raul A. España,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Tackett\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40750-021-00167-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of the present study was to extend the findings of the dual-hormone hypothesis (DHH) literature by assessing whether the interaction between testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) is associated with dominance in an adolescent sample via multiple methods of measuring T, C, and dominance, and with pre-registration of hypotheses and analyses.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a sample of 337 adolescents (<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 14.98, <i>SD</i> = 1.51; 191 girls) and their caregivers, hormonal assays were obtained from hair and saliva, and dominance behavior was assessed across four operationalizations (behavioral ratings in a leadership task, self- and caregiver reported dominance motivations, and self-reported social potency).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>T and C main effects were generally null across hormone and dominance operationalizations, except that observer-rated dominance was negatively associated with salivary T, and social potency was positively associated with salivary T and negatively associated with salivary C. Support for the DHH was weak. Point estimates reflected a small negative T × C interaction for behavioral ratings of dominance, consistent with the DHH, whereas interaction effects for report-based dominance measures were close to zero or positive.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results contribute to a growing evidence base suggesting T × C interaction effects are variable across measures and methods used to assess hormones and dominance and highlight the need for comprehensive, multi-method examinations employing best practices in scientific openness and transparency to reduce uncertainty in estimates. Measurement of hormones and dominance outcomes vary across labs and studies, and the largely null results should be considered in that context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"183 - 208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40750-021-00167-3\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-021-00167-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-021-00167-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究的目的是通过多种测量T、C和优势的方法,以及假设和分析的预先登记,评估睾酮(T)和皮质醇(C)之间的相互作用是否与青少年样本中的优势有关,从而扩展双激素假说(DHH)文献的发现。方法对337名青少年(Mage = 14.98,标准差 = 1.51;191名女孩)及其照顾者,从头发和唾液中获得激素测定,并在四个操作中评估支配行为(领导任务中的行为评级、自我和照顾者报告的支配动机以及自我报告的社会效能),除了观察者评定的优势与唾液T呈负相关,社会效能与唾液T呈正相关,与唾液C呈负相关。对DHH的支持较弱。点估计值反映了一个小的负T × C支配行为评级的交互作用,与DHH一致,而基于报告的支配测量的交互作用效应接近于零或正。结论这些结果有助于增加证据基础,表明T × C相互作用效应在用于评估激素和优势的措施和方法中是可变的,并强调需要采用科学公开和透明的最佳实践进行全面、多方法的检查,以减少估计的不确定性。激素和优势结果的测量在实验室和研究中各不相同,在这种情况下应该考虑基本无效的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Relate to Adolescent Dominance? A Pre-registered Multi-method Interrogation of the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis

Objective

The goal of the present study was to extend the findings of the dual-hormone hypothesis (DHH) literature by assessing whether the interaction between testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) is associated with dominance in an adolescent sample via multiple methods of measuring T, C, and dominance, and with pre-registration of hypotheses and analyses.

Methods

In a sample of 337 adolescents (Mage = 14.98, SD = 1.51; 191 girls) and their caregivers, hormonal assays were obtained from hair and saliva, and dominance behavior was assessed across four operationalizations (behavioral ratings in a leadership task, self- and caregiver reported dominance motivations, and self-reported social potency).

Results

T and C main effects were generally null across hormone and dominance operationalizations, except that observer-rated dominance was negatively associated with salivary T, and social potency was positively associated with salivary T and negatively associated with salivary C. Support for the DHH was weak. Point estimates reflected a small negative T × C interaction for behavioral ratings of dominance, consistent with the DHH, whereas interaction effects for report-based dominance measures were close to zero or positive.

Conclusions

The results contribute to a growing evidence base suggesting T × C interaction effects are variable across measures and methods used to assess hormones and dominance and highlight the need for comprehensive, multi-method examinations employing best practices in scientific openness and transparency to reduce uncertainty in estimates. Measurement of hormones and dominance outcomes vary across labs and studies, and the largely null results should be considered in that context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology is an international interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes theoretical and empirical studies of any aspects of adaptive human behavior (e.g. cooperation, affiliation, and bonding, competition and aggression, sex and relationships, parenting, decision-making), with emphasis on studies that also address the biological (e.g. neural, endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, genetic) mechanisms controlling behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信