John Mayne和贡献分析的经验法则：与两种相关方法的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.3138/cjpe.75448

F. Leeuw

{"title":"John Mayne和贡献分析的经验法则：与两种相关方法的比较","authors":"F. Leeuw","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.75448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses differences and similarities between (methodological) rules of thumb of contribution analysis, realist evaluation, and the policy-scientific approach to (program) evaluations. John Mayne’s work and his operating procedures are presented and structured. One of the conclusions is that the three approaches form a ‘family.’ This ‘family’ can substantially contribute to at least six of the 10 “declarations of the Program Theory Manifesto” presented in 2019.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Mayne and Rules of Thumb for Contribution Analysis: A Comparison With Two Related Approaches\",\"authors\":\"F. Leeuw\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/cjpe.75448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses differences and similarities between (methodological) rules of thumb of contribution analysis, realist evaluation, and the policy-scientific approach to (program) evaluations. John Mayne’s work and his operating procedures are presented and structured. One of the conclusions is that the three approaches form a ‘family.’ This ‘family’ can substantially contribute to at least six of the 10 “declarations of the Program Theory Manifesto” presented in 2019.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.75448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.75448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了（方法论）贡献分析经验法则、现实主义评价和（项目）评价的政策科学方法之间的异同。约翰·梅恩的工作和他的操作程序是介绍和结构化的。其中一个结论是，这三种方法形成了一个“家庭”这个“家庭”可以为2019年提出的10项“程序理论宣言”中的至少6项做出重大贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

John Mayne and Rules of Thumb for Contribution Analysis: A Comparison With Two Related Approaches

This article discusses differences and similarities between (methodological) rules of thumb of contribution analysis, realist evaluation, and the policy-scientific approach to (program) evaluations. John Mayne’s work and his operating procedures are presented and structured. One of the conclusions is that the three approaches form a ‘family.’ This ‘family’ can substantially contribute to at least six of the 10 “declarations of the Program Theory Manifesto” presented in 2019.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

25.00%

发文量