{"title":"语言熟悉度、话语长度和语音质量对韵律边界识别的影响","authors":"C. Kuo","doi":"10.1075/consl.22029.kuo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the effects of several stimulus sources:\n language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality, on listeners’\n predictions of the sizes of the upcoming prosodic boundaries. Experiments with\n native Taiwanese speakers were conducted, and the stimuli varied in prosodic\n boundary units (i.e., word, phrase, and sentence), languages (i.e., Taiwanese,\n English, and Swedish), utterance lengths (i.e., 2-second, and 2 syllables; the\n latter is approximately 0.416-second long), and speech qualities (i.e., normal\n speech, low-pass filtered speech). Results showed that: (a) listeners performed\n better when the utterances were longer; (b) listeners performed better in\n low-pass filtered speech when they had no prior knowledge of the target\n language; (c) there was a tendency for the language familiarity effect, but this\n effect was heavily influenced by the extent of similarity of the phonetic\n realizations in different prosodic boundaries, and the listeners’ language\n proficiency which was associated with working memory storage capacity.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality\\n in prosodic boundary identification\",\"authors\":\"C. Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/consl.22029.kuo\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study investigates the effects of several stimulus sources:\\n language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality, on listeners’\\n predictions of the sizes of the upcoming prosodic boundaries. Experiments with\\n native Taiwanese speakers were conducted, and the stimuli varied in prosodic\\n boundary units (i.e., word, phrase, and sentence), languages (i.e., Taiwanese,\\n English, and Swedish), utterance lengths (i.e., 2-second, and 2 syllables; the\\n latter is approximately 0.416-second long), and speech qualities (i.e., normal\\n speech, low-pass filtered speech). Results showed that: (a) listeners performed\\n better when the utterances were longer; (b) listeners performed better in\\n low-pass filtered speech when they had no prior knowledge of the target\\n language; (c) there was a tendency for the language familiarity effect, but this\\n effect was heavily influenced by the extent of similarity of the phonetic\\n realizations in different prosodic boundaries, and the listeners’ language\\n proficiency which was associated with working memory storage capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22029.kuo\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22029.kuo","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality
in prosodic boundary identification
This study investigates the effects of several stimulus sources:
language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality, on listeners’
predictions of the sizes of the upcoming prosodic boundaries. Experiments with
native Taiwanese speakers were conducted, and the stimuli varied in prosodic
boundary units (i.e., word, phrase, and sentence), languages (i.e., Taiwanese,
English, and Swedish), utterance lengths (i.e., 2-second, and 2 syllables; the
latter is approximately 0.416-second long), and speech qualities (i.e., normal
speech, low-pass filtered speech). Results showed that: (a) listeners performed
better when the utterances were longer; (b) listeners performed better in
low-pass filtered speech when they had no prior knowledge of the target
language; (c) there was a tendency for the language familiarity effect, but this
effect was heavily influenced by the extent of similarity of the phonetic
realizations in different prosodic boundaries, and the listeners’ language
proficiency which was associated with working memory storage capacity.
期刊介绍:
Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.