对跨专业协作实践技能收益的非常简短评估的验证:ICCAS-Q21

P. Ohtake, D. Kruger, J. Kruger
{"title":"对跨专业协作实践技能收益的非常简短评估的验证:ICCAS-Q21","authors":"P. Ohtake, D. Kruger, J. Kruger","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Assessing interprofessional education (IPE) learning experience effectiveness for developing interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) skill ability is important; however, current assessment measures pose considerable time burdens to respondents and learning experience logistics. Review of Literature. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) is a frequently used measure for self-assessed IPCP skill ability. The ICCAS instrument is administered after an interprofessional learning experience and uses a retrospective pretest/posttest design to assess 20 items and includes one additional item assessing overall skill gain (ICCAS-Q21). Although the total ICCAS score can reveal changes in IPCP abilities after an IPE learning experience, a brief measure may facilitate assessment with greater efficiency. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the ICCAS-Q21 has the psychometric properties to serve as a stand-alone assessment instrument of self-assessed change in ability to perform the IPEC core competency skills. Subjects. Complete ICCAS scores were analyzed from 1,480 students from 12 different health professions programs (Fall 2019 [n = 807] and Spring 2020 [n = 673]). Methods. The ICCAS was completed after 2 in-person IPE forums. Total ICCAS pretest, posttest, and pretest–posttest difference (gain) scores were determined. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey interitem reliabilities were assessed, and Pearson correlations were conducted with ICCAS-Q21 and the total ICCAS pretest, posttest, and gain scores. Results. Total ICCAS scores increased after each IPE forum (P < .001). High internal consistency was observed among all items of the ICCAS. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey-Q21 was highly correlated with ICCAS gain scores (Fall r = .431, Spring r = .468; P < .001). Discussion and Conclusion. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey-Q21, a single-item assessment instrument, has psychometric properties that warrant its use to evaluate the self-assessed change in IPE core competency skill ability and is a good proxy for the full ICCAS instrument. This brief assessment instrument provides additional flexibility in assessment techniques for IPCP learning experiences.","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"36 1","pages":"311 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Very Brief Assessment of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice Skill Gains: ICCAS-Q21\",\"authors\":\"P. Ohtake, D. Kruger, J. Kruger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Assessing interprofessional education (IPE) learning experience effectiveness for developing interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) skill ability is important; however, current assessment measures pose considerable time burdens to respondents and learning experience logistics. Review of Literature. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) is a frequently used measure for self-assessed IPCP skill ability. The ICCAS instrument is administered after an interprofessional learning experience and uses a retrospective pretest/posttest design to assess 20 items and includes one additional item assessing overall skill gain (ICCAS-Q21). Although the total ICCAS score can reveal changes in IPCP abilities after an IPE learning experience, a brief measure may facilitate assessment with greater efficiency. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the ICCAS-Q21 has the psychometric properties to serve as a stand-alone assessment instrument of self-assessed change in ability to perform the IPEC core competency skills. Subjects. Complete ICCAS scores were analyzed from 1,480 students from 12 different health professions programs (Fall 2019 [n = 807] and Spring 2020 [n = 673]). Methods. The ICCAS was completed after 2 in-person IPE forums. Total ICCAS pretest, posttest, and pretest–posttest difference (gain) scores were determined. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey interitem reliabilities were assessed, and Pearson correlations were conducted with ICCAS-Q21 and the total ICCAS pretest, posttest, and gain scores. Results. Total ICCAS scores increased after each IPE forum (P < .001). High internal consistency was observed among all items of the ICCAS. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey-Q21 was highly correlated with ICCAS gain scores (Fall r = .431, Spring r = .468; P < .001). Discussion and Conclusion. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey-Q21, a single-item assessment instrument, has psychometric properties that warrant its use to evaluate the self-assessed change in IPE core competency skill ability and is a good proxy for the full ICCAS instrument. This brief assessment instrument provides additional flexibility in assessment techniques for IPCP learning experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。评估跨专业教育(IPE)学习经验有效性对培养跨专业协作实践(IPCP)技能能力具有重要意义;然而,目前的评估措施给受访者和学习经验物流带来了相当大的时间负担。文献回顾。跨专业协作能力成就调查(ICCAS)是一种常用的自我评估IPCP技能能力的方法。ICCAS工具是在跨专业学习经历后进行的,并使用回顾性前测/后测设计来评估20个项目,包括一个评估整体技能获得的附加项目(ICCAS- q21)。虽然ICCAS总分可以揭示IPE学习经历后IPCP能力的变化,但一个简短的测量可能有助于更有效的评估。本研究的目的是确定ICCAS-Q21是否具有心理测量学属性,可作为独立的评估工具,用于评估学生执行IPEC核心能力技能的自我评估能力变化。科目。分析了来自12个不同卫生专业项目(2019年秋季[n = 807]和2020年春季[n = 673])的1480名学生的完整ICCAS评分。方法。ICCAS是在两次面对面的IPE论坛之后完成的。测定ICCAS前测、后测和前测-后测差异(增益)总分。评估跨专业协作能力获得调查项目间信度,并与ICCAS- q21和ICCAS前测、后测和获得总分进行Pearson相关分析。结果。每次IPE论坛结束后,ICCAS总分均有所上升(P < 0.001)。ICCAS各项目间具有高度的内部一致性。跨专业协作能力获得调查- q21与ICCAS获得分数高度相关(秋季r = .431,春季r = .468;P < 0.001)。讨论与结论。跨专业协作能力素养调查- q21是一种单项目评估工具,具有心理测量学特性,可以用来评估IPE核心能力技能能力的自我评估变化,是完整ICCAS工具的良好代表。这个简短的评估工具为IPCP学习经验的评估技术提供了额外的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a Very Brief Assessment of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice Skill Gains: ICCAS-Q21
Introduction. Assessing interprofessional education (IPE) learning experience effectiveness for developing interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) skill ability is important; however, current assessment measures pose considerable time burdens to respondents and learning experience logistics. Review of Literature. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) is a frequently used measure for self-assessed IPCP skill ability. The ICCAS instrument is administered after an interprofessional learning experience and uses a retrospective pretest/posttest design to assess 20 items and includes one additional item assessing overall skill gain (ICCAS-Q21). Although the total ICCAS score can reveal changes in IPCP abilities after an IPE learning experience, a brief measure may facilitate assessment with greater efficiency. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the ICCAS-Q21 has the psychometric properties to serve as a stand-alone assessment instrument of self-assessed change in ability to perform the IPEC core competency skills. Subjects. Complete ICCAS scores were analyzed from 1,480 students from 12 different health professions programs (Fall 2019 [n = 807] and Spring 2020 [n = 673]). Methods. The ICCAS was completed after 2 in-person IPE forums. Total ICCAS pretest, posttest, and pretest–posttest difference (gain) scores were determined. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey interitem reliabilities were assessed, and Pearson correlations were conducted with ICCAS-Q21 and the total ICCAS pretest, posttest, and gain scores. Results. Total ICCAS scores increased after each IPE forum (P < .001). High internal consistency was observed among all items of the ICCAS. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey-Q21 was highly correlated with ICCAS gain scores (Fall r = .431, Spring r = .468; P < .001). Discussion and Conclusion. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey-Q21, a single-item assessment instrument, has psychometric properties that warrant its use to evaluate the self-assessed change in IPE core competency skill ability and is a good proxy for the full ICCAS instrument. This brief assessment instrument provides additional flexibility in assessment techniques for IPCP learning experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信