公共政策合法性、正当性和正当性指标分析——以墨西哥REDD+为例

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
M. L. Ávalos-Rodríguez, M. McCall, J. Špirić, M. I. Ramírez, J. Alvarado
{"title":"公共政策合法性、正当性和正当性指标分析——以墨西哥REDD+为例","authors":"M. L. Ávalos-Rodríguez, M. McCall, J. Špirić, M. I. Ramírez, J. Alvarado","doi":"10.1505/146554821832952807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HIGHLIGHTS Forest governance schemes should incorporate the principles of legality, legitimacy, and legitimation. The principle of legality arises from the existence of a legal framework in force. The principle of legitimacy is born from social recognition. The principle of legitimation can be understood from the desired effect of both the law and social recognition. Normative, sociological and institutional indicators can be identified that allow understanding of the legitimacy. SUMMARY At the international level, the REDD+ mechanism has been promoted through public policies and financial incentives to improve forest conditions and reduce climate change. Given the dynamics of deforestation and forest degradation in Mexico, REDD+ has been implemented as a strategy that can be analyzed under indicators of legality, legitimacy and legitimation to understand its acceptance in the community and the achievement of the effects of policies planned, formulated, implemented and evaluated as forest governance schemes. The objective of this study is to identify in the scientific literature the main indicators of legality, legitimacy and legitimation in public policies and to propose a framework for analyzing forest governance in Mexico, using REDD+ as an example of an emerging international public policy. To achieve an approach to legality, legitimacy and legitimation, an exploration, review and description of various studies that have identified these indicators has been carried out. Some of the studies are associated with forest governance schemes and propose models to determine their presence in government actions, public policies and forestry legislation. The main findings suggest that the construction of normative, sociological and institutional indicators, mainly for forest legitimacy, as well as the knowledge of the normativity (legality) and the effect caused (legitimation) must be understood in an interrelated way, even though, in the literature, some authors identify legitimacy as synonymous with legitimation.","PeriodicalId":13868,"journal":{"name":"International Forestry Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"127 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Indicators of Legality, Legitimacy and Legitimation in Public Policy: An Example of REDD+ in Mexico\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Ávalos-Rodríguez, M. McCall, J. Špirić, M. I. Ramírez, J. Alvarado\",\"doi\":\"10.1505/146554821832952807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"HIGHLIGHTS Forest governance schemes should incorporate the principles of legality, legitimacy, and legitimation. The principle of legality arises from the existence of a legal framework in force. The principle of legitimacy is born from social recognition. The principle of legitimation can be understood from the desired effect of both the law and social recognition. Normative, sociological and institutional indicators can be identified that allow understanding of the legitimacy. SUMMARY At the international level, the REDD+ mechanism has been promoted through public policies and financial incentives to improve forest conditions and reduce climate change. Given the dynamics of deforestation and forest degradation in Mexico, REDD+ has been implemented as a strategy that can be analyzed under indicators of legality, legitimacy and legitimation to understand its acceptance in the community and the achievement of the effects of policies planned, formulated, implemented and evaluated as forest governance schemes. The objective of this study is to identify in the scientific literature the main indicators of legality, legitimacy and legitimation in public policies and to propose a framework for analyzing forest governance in Mexico, using REDD+ as an example of an emerging international public policy. To achieve an approach to legality, legitimacy and legitimation, an exploration, review and description of various studies that have identified these indicators has been carried out. Some of the studies are associated with forest governance schemes and propose models to determine their presence in government actions, public policies and forestry legislation. The main findings suggest that the construction of normative, sociological and institutional indicators, mainly for forest legitimacy, as well as the knowledge of the normativity (legality) and the effect caused (legitimation) must be understood in an interrelated way, even though, in the literature, some authors identify legitimacy as synonymous with legitimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Forestry Review\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Forestry Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821832952807\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forestry Review","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821832952807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林治理方案应结合合法性、正当性和正当性原则。合法性原则产生于存在一种有效的法律框架。合法性原则产生于社会认同。正当性原则可以从法律的预期效果和社会认可两方面来理解。可以确定规范性、社会学和体制指标,使人们能够理解其合法性。在国际层面,REDD+机制通过公共政策和财政激励措施得到推动,以改善森林条件和减缓气候变化。鉴于墨西哥森林砍伐和森林退化的动态,REDD+已作为一项战略实施,可以根据合法性、合法性和正当性指标进行分析,以了解其在社区中的接受程度,以及作为森林治理计划规划、制定、实施和评估的政策的效果。本研究的目的是在科学文献中确定公共政策的合法性、合法性和正当性的主要指标,并提出一个框架来分析墨西哥的森林治理,以REDD+作为新兴国际公共政策的一个例子。为了实现对合法性、合法性和正当性的处理,对确定这些指标的各种研究进行了探索、审查和说明。其中一些研究与森林管理计划有关,并提出模式以确定它们在政府行动、公共政策和林业立法中的存在。主要研究结果表明,规范、社会学和制度指标(主要是森林合法性指标)的构建,以及对规范性(合法性)和造成的影响(合法性)的认识,必须以一种相互关联的方式来理解,尽管在文献中,一些作者将合法性等同于合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Indicators of Legality, Legitimacy and Legitimation in Public Policy: An Example of REDD+ in Mexico
HIGHLIGHTS Forest governance schemes should incorporate the principles of legality, legitimacy, and legitimation. The principle of legality arises from the existence of a legal framework in force. The principle of legitimacy is born from social recognition. The principle of legitimation can be understood from the desired effect of both the law and social recognition. Normative, sociological and institutional indicators can be identified that allow understanding of the legitimacy. SUMMARY At the international level, the REDD+ mechanism has been promoted through public policies and financial incentives to improve forest conditions and reduce climate change. Given the dynamics of deforestation and forest degradation in Mexico, REDD+ has been implemented as a strategy that can be analyzed under indicators of legality, legitimacy and legitimation to understand its acceptance in the community and the achievement of the effects of policies planned, formulated, implemented and evaluated as forest governance schemes. The objective of this study is to identify in the scientific literature the main indicators of legality, legitimacy and legitimation in public policies and to propose a framework for analyzing forest governance in Mexico, using REDD+ as an example of an emerging international public policy. To achieve an approach to legality, legitimacy and legitimation, an exploration, review and description of various studies that have identified these indicators has been carried out. Some of the studies are associated with forest governance schemes and propose models to determine their presence in government actions, public policies and forestry legislation. The main findings suggest that the construction of normative, sociological and institutional indicators, mainly for forest legitimacy, as well as the knowledge of the normativity (legality) and the effect caused (legitimation) must be understood in an interrelated way, even though, in the literature, some authors identify legitimacy as synonymous with legitimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Forestry Review
International Forestry Review 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Forestry Review is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that publishes original research and review papers on forest policy and science, with an emphasis on issues of transnational significance. It is published four times per year, in March, June, September and December. Special Issues are a regular feature and attract a wide audience. Click here for subscription details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信