社交媒体上分享的正畸患者经历:范围界定综述

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maurice J Meade , Brianna Poirier , Xiangqun Ju , Lisa Jamieson
{"title":"社交媒体上分享的正畸患者经历:范围界定综述","authors":"Maurice J Meade ,&nbsp;Brianna Poirier ,&nbsp;Xiangqun Ju ,&nbsp;Lisa Jamieson","doi":"10.1053/j.sodo.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of social media has increased significantly, which enables the sharing of patient experiences of healthcare interventions. Evaluation of the available data regarding patient experiences of their own orthodontic treatment is lacking. The present registered scoping review aimed to collate and evaluate the current evidence to enable a greater understanding of the experiences of patients, undergoing orthodontic treatment, conveyed via social media platforms regarding their treatment<em>.</em> Studies with patients reporting their orthodontic experiences through social media platforms regarding orthodontic treatment were considered for evaluation. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus) were searched up until January 29<sup>th</sup>, 2023.</p><p>A total of 379 records were screened, of which 47 potentially pertinent articles were obtained in full. Twelve studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria following screening and were assessed in the present scoping review. Most studies evaluated patient experiences conveyed via Twitter. The findings indicated that patient experiences regarding orthodontic treatment were generally positive and those regarding orthodontic retention were generally negative. Positive experiences included satisfaction associated with treatment outcome, removal of fixed appliances and the aesthetic appearance of clear aligners. Negative experiences related to pain/discomfort, impact on speech and eating, dislike of retainers and the need to comply with retainer wear protocols. Instagram appears to be the social media platform through which patients are more likely to express positive sentiments. Research is required to develop validated methodological processes to enable future systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies, and to develop strategies for the orthodontic profession to minimise the negative experiences borne by their patients. In addition, guidance on the appropriate ethical management of data in future similar studies is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48688,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Orthodontics","volume":"29 4","pages":"Pages 326-334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623000737/pdfft?md5=92b3650114be566cb6e2616bb4ed1953&pid=1-s2.0-S1073874623000737-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthodontic patient experiences shared on social media: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Maurice J Meade ,&nbsp;Brianna Poirier ,&nbsp;Xiangqun Ju ,&nbsp;Lisa Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sodo.2023.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of social media has increased significantly, which enables the sharing of patient experiences of healthcare interventions. Evaluation of the available data regarding patient experiences of their own orthodontic treatment is lacking. The present registered scoping review aimed to collate and evaluate the current evidence to enable a greater understanding of the experiences of patients, undergoing orthodontic treatment, conveyed via social media platforms regarding their treatment<em>.</em> Studies with patients reporting their orthodontic experiences through social media platforms regarding orthodontic treatment were considered for evaluation. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus) were searched up until January 29<sup>th</sup>, 2023.</p><p>A total of 379 records were screened, of which 47 potentially pertinent articles were obtained in full. Twelve studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria following screening and were assessed in the present scoping review. Most studies evaluated patient experiences conveyed via Twitter. The findings indicated that patient experiences regarding orthodontic treatment were generally positive and those regarding orthodontic retention were generally negative. Positive experiences included satisfaction associated with treatment outcome, removal of fixed appliances and the aesthetic appearance of clear aligners. Negative experiences related to pain/discomfort, impact on speech and eating, dislike of retainers and the need to comply with retainer wear protocols. Instagram appears to be the social media platform through which patients are more likely to express positive sentiments. Research is required to develop validated methodological processes to enable future systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies, and to develop strategies for the orthodontic profession to minimise the negative experiences borne by their patients. In addition, guidance on the appropriate ethical management of data in future similar studies is required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 326-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623000737/pdfft?md5=92b3650114be566cb6e2616bb4ed1953&pid=1-s2.0-S1073874623000737-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623000737\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623000737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

社会媒体的使用显著增加,这使得患者能够分享医疗保健干预措施的经验。缺乏对患者自身正畸治疗经验的现有数据的评估。目前注册的范围审查旨在整理和评估现有证据,以便更好地了解通过社交媒体平台进行正畸治疗的患者的治疗经历。研究考虑了患者通过社交媒体平台报告正畸治疗经历的研究。检索截止到2023年1月29日的四个电子数据库(PubMed, Web of Science, Embase和Scopus)。总共筛选了379项记录,其中47项可能有关的文章获得了全文。在筛选后,有12项研究符合纳入和排除标准,并在本综述中进行了评估。大多数研究评估的是通过Twitter传达的患者体验。结果表明,患者对正畸治疗的体验普遍是积极的,而对正畸保留的体验普遍是消极的。积极的体验包括对治疗结果的满意度,固定矫治器的移除和透明矫正器的美观外观。与疼痛/不适相关的负面体验,对言语和饮食的影响,不喜欢固位器以及需要遵守固位器佩戴协议。Instagram似乎是患者更有可能表达积极情绪的社交媒体平台。研究需要开发有效的方法流程,以便将来对相关研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,并为正畸专业制定策略,以尽量减少患者的负面经历。此外,还需要对未来类似研究中数据的适当伦理管理提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orthodontic patient experiences shared on social media: A scoping review

The use of social media has increased significantly, which enables the sharing of patient experiences of healthcare interventions. Evaluation of the available data regarding patient experiences of their own orthodontic treatment is lacking. The present registered scoping review aimed to collate and evaluate the current evidence to enable a greater understanding of the experiences of patients, undergoing orthodontic treatment, conveyed via social media platforms regarding their treatment. Studies with patients reporting their orthodontic experiences through social media platforms regarding orthodontic treatment were considered for evaluation. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus) were searched up until January 29th, 2023.

A total of 379 records were screened, of which 47 potentially pertinent articles were obtained in full. Twelve studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria following screening and were assessed in the present scoping review. Most studies evaluated patient experiences conveyed via Twitter. The findings indicated that patient experiences regarding orthodontic treatment were generally positive and those regarding orthodontic retention were generally negative. Positive experiences included satisfaction associated with treatment outcome, removal of fixed appliances and the aesthetic appearance of clear aligners. Negative experiences related to pain/discomfort, impact on speech and eating, dislike of retainers and the need to comply with retainer wear protocols. Instagram appears to be the social media platform through which patients are more likely to express positive sentiments. Research is required to develop validated methodological processes to enable future systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies, and to develop strategies for the orthodontic profession to minimise the negative experiences borne by their patients. In addition, guidance on the appropriate ethical management of data in future similar studies is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Orthodontics
Seminars in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 days
期刊介绍: Each issue provides up-to-date, state-of-the-art information on a single topic in orthodontics. Readers are kept abreast of the latest innovations, research findings, clinical applications and clinical methods. Collection of the issues will provide invaluable reference material for present and future review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信