项目和产品风险管理之间缺失的环节:从评审到行动号召

IF 3.7 3区管理学 Q2 BUSINESS

Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101770

Jelena Petronijevic , Alain Etienne , Samuel Bassetto , Ali Siadat

{"title":"项目和产品风险管理之间缺失的环节:从评审到行动号召","authors":"Jelena Petronijevic , Alain Etienne , Samuel Bassetto , Ali Siadat","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Comprehensive process / project and product risk management is not easy to achieve due to the complexity of products and projects, and the nature of standardized methods which are usually suitable for one of the two areas. This review investigates risk management tendencies in engineering literature. It distinguishes the notion of risk regarding the subject involved; emphasizes the risk tradeoffs based on the observed problem; shows the scientific gap in the sense of needs and global guidelines; and provides direction for future development in these areas. The review is concluded with the call for action including discussion and axes of development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101770"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The missing link between project and product risk management: From the review to the call to action\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Petronijevic , Alain Etienne , Samuel Bassetto , Ali Siadat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Comprehensive process / project and product risk management is not easy to achieve due to the complexity of products and projects, and the nature of standardized methods which are usually suitable for one of the two areas. This review investigates risk management tendencies in engineering literature. It distinguishes the notion of risk regarding the subject involved; emphasizes the risk tradeoffs based on the observed problem; shows the scientific gap in the sense of needs and global guidelines; and provides direction for future development in these areas. The review is concluded with the call for action including discussion and axes of development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101770\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474823000401\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474823000401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

由于产品和项目的复杂性，以及标准化方法的性质，全面的过程/项目和产品风险管理不容易实现，而标准化方法通常只适用于这两个领域中的一个。这篇综述调查了工程文献中的风险管理趋势。它区分了所涉及主体的风险概念;强调基于观察到的问题的风险权衡;显示在需求意识和全球指导方针方面的科学差距;并为这些领域的未来发展提供了方向。审查结束时呼吁采取行动，包括讨论和发展轴。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The missing link between project and product risk management: From the review to the call to action

Comprehensive process / project and product risk management is not easy to achieve due to the complexity of products and projects, and the nature of standardized methods which are usually suitable for one of the two areas. This review investigates risk management tendencies in engineering literature. It distinguishes the notion of risk regarding the subject involved; emphasizes the risk tradeoffs based on the observed problem; shows the scientific gap in the sense of needs and global guidelines; and provides direction for future development in these areas. The review is concluded with the call for action including discussion and axes of development.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 管理科学-工程：工业

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

6.20%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management. The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning. The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.