Michael E. Deckard, D. Sharar, M. Fish, P. Shamberger
{"title":"阶跃响应热作用下有限厚度板相变材料行为","authors":"Michael E. Deckard, D. Sharar, M. Fish, P. Shamberger","doi":"10.1115/1.4054651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Phase change materials (PCMs) can provide thermal buffering to systems that experience transient heat loads, including electronics packaging. Placing the PCM in the primary path of heat rejection decreases the thermal resistance between the heat source and the PCM volume, but increases the total thermal resistance between the heat source and heat sink. In systems that operate in both steady-state and transient regimes, this introduces tradeoffs between cooling performance in these distinct regimes. Employing a conductive finite volume model, Parapower, we investigate those tradeoffs considering the impact of adding a layer of gallium (Ga), a low melting point metal, and a layer of copper (Cu) between a planar heat source and a convective boundary condition heatsink. We demonstrate: 1) side-by-side comparisons of latent (Ga) and sensible (Cu) heat storage layers must consider different layer thicknesses to account for the different thermal storage mechanisms, 2) for short periods of time, conditions exist in which a PCM outperforms a traditional heat sink for transient thermal buffering at an equivalent steady state temperature rise, and 3) under these conditions, the Ga layer is approximately an order of magnitude thinner than the equivalent Cu, leading to significant mass and volume savings.","PeriodicalId":15663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electronic Packaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase Change Material Behavior in Finite Thickness Slabs Under a Step Response Heat\",\"authors\":\"Michael E. Deckard, D. Sharar, M. Fish, P. Shamberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4054651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Phase change materials (PCMs) can provide thermal buffering to systems that experience transient heat loads, including electronics packaging. Placing the PCM in the primary path of heat rejection decreases the thermal resistance between the heat source and the PCM volume, but increases the total thermal resistance between the heat source and heat sink. In systems that operate in both steady-state and transient regimes, this introduces tradeoffs between cooling performance in these distinct regimes. Employing a conductive finite volume model, Parapower, we investigate those tradeoffs considering the impact of adding a layer of gallium (Ga), a low melting point metal, and a layer of copper (Cu) between a planar heat source and a convective boundary condition heatsink. We demonstrate: 1) side-by-side comparisons of latent (Ga) and sensible (Cu) heat storage layers must consider different layer thicknesses to account for the different thermal storage mechanisms, 2) for short periods of time, conditions exist in which a PCM outperforms a traditional heat sink for transient thermal buffering at an equivalent steady state temperature rise, and 3) under these conditions, the Ga layer is approximately an order of magnitude thinner than the equivalent Cu, leading to significant mass and volume savings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electronic Packaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electronic Packaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054651\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electronic Packaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phase Change Material Behavior in Finite Thickness Slabs Under a Step Response Heat
Phase change materials (PCMs) can provide thermal buffering to systems that experience transient heat loads, including electronics packaging. Placing the PCM in the primary path of heat rejection decreases the thermal resistance between the heat source and the PCM volume, but increases the total thermal resistance between the heat source and heat sink. In systems that operate in both steady-state and transient regimes, this introduces tradeoffs between cooling performance in these distinct regimes. Employing a conductive finite volume model, Parapower, we investigate those tradeoffs considering the impact of adding a layer of gallium (Ga), a low melting point metal, and a layer of copper (Cu) between a planar heat source and a convective boundary condition heatsink. We demonstrate: 1) side-by-side comparisons of latent (Ga) and sensible (Cu) heat storage layers must consider different layer thicknesses to account for the different thermal storage mechanisms, 2) for short periods of time, conditions exist in which a PCM outperforms a traditional heat sink for transient thermal buffering at an equivalent steady state temperature rise, and 3) under these conditions, the Ga layer is approximately an order of magnitude thinner than the equivalent Cu, leading to significant mass and volume savings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Electronic Packaging publishes papers that use experimental and theoretical (analytical and computer-aided) methods, approaches, and techniques to address and solve various mechanical, materials, and reliability problems encountered in the analysis, design, manufacturing, testing, and operation of electronic and photonics components, devices, and systems.
Scope: Microsystems packaging; Systems integration; Flexible electronics; Materials with nano structures and in general small scale systems.