{"title":"钢筋混凝土柱防火设计中标称曲率法的再评价","authors":"P. Bamonte","doi":"10.1177/0734904119895436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reappraisal of the method based on nominal curvature for designing reinforced concrete columns in fire is proposed, with the focus on the validation of an alternative and widely accepted way of applying the method, which differs from the current provisions of EN 1992-1-2. To this end, a systematic comparison between experimental and numerical results is carried out on a database consisting of 74 columns tested in different laboratories. The comparison shows that the method based on nominal curvature yields conservative estimates of the time to failure. Moreover, the numerical results obtained are reasonably close to those obtained by means of finite element analysis. By contrast, if the method is applied in combination with the simplified methods introduced in EN 1992-1-2, the numerical results are not conservative, with a significant overestimation of the bearing capacity of the columns, and of the time to failure, mainly because of the overestimation of the stiffness by the simplified methods.","PeriodicalId":15772,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fire Sciences","volume":"38 1","pages":"106 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0734904119895436","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reappraisal of the nominal curvature method in the fire design of reinforced concrete columns\",\"authors\":\"P. Bamonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0734904119895436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A reappraisal of the method based on nominal curvature for designing reinforced concrete columns in fire is proposed, with the focus on the validation of an alternative and widely accepted way of applying the method, which differs from the current provisions of EN 1992-1-2. To this end, a systematic comparison between experimental and numerical results is carried out on a database consisting of 74 columns tested in different laboratories. The comparison shows that the method based on nominal curvature yields conservative estimates of the time to failure. Moreover, the numerical results obtained are reasonably close to those obtained by means of finite element analysis. By contrast, if the method is applied in combination with the simplified methods introduced in EN 1992-1-2, the numerical results are not conservative, with a significant overestimation of the bearing capacity of the columns, and of the time to failure, mainly because of the overestimation of the stiffness by the simplified methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fire Sciences\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"106 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0734904119895436\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fire Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734904119895436\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fire Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734904119895436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A reappraisal of the nominal curvature method in the fire design of reinforced concrete columns
A reappraisal of the method based on nominal curvature for designing reinforced concrete columns in fire is proposed, with the focus on the validation of an alternative and widely accepted way of applying the method, which differs from the current provisions of EN 1992-1-2. To this end, a systematic comparison between experimental and numerical results is carried out on a database consisting of 74 columns tested in different laboratories. The comparison shows that the method based on nominal curvature yields conservative estimates of the time to failure. Moreover, the numerical results obtained are reasonably close to those obtained by means of finite element analysis. By contrast, if the method is applied in combination with the simplified methods introduced in EN 1992-1-2, the numerical results are not conservative, with a significant overestimation of the bearing capacity of the columns, and of the time to failure, mainly because of the overestimation of the stiffness by the simplified methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Fire Sciences is a leading journal for the reporting of significant fundamental and applied research that brings understanding of fire chemistry and fire physics to fire safety. Its content is aimed toward the prevention and mitigation of the adverse effects of fires involving combustible materials, as well as development of new tools to better address fire safety needs. The Journal of Fire Sciences covers experimental or theoretical studies of fire initiation and growth, flame retardant chemistry, fire physics relative to material behavior, fire containment, fire threat to people and the environment and fire safety engineering. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).