教师对语音的使用、语言结构的知识以及与初读者相关的首选单词识别提示*

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
J. Chapman, Keith T. Greaney, Alison Arrow, W. Tunmer
{"title":"教师对语音的使用、语言结构的知识以及与初读者相关的首选单词识别提示*","authors":"J. Chapman, Keith T. Greaney, Alison Arrow, W. Tunmer","doi":"10.1080/19404158.2018.1467937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract New Zealand’s approach to literacy instruction is predominantly whole language. Explicit code-orientated literacy instruction is not favoured, however, most teachers are believed to include phonics in their literacy lessons. No study has been reported on phonics use in New Zealand schools. Survey responses on the use of phonics instruction from 666 primary school teachers were analysed. We also assessed knowledge of the basic language constructs related to early reading success with 55 teachers participating in a professional development program on literacy teaching. A word identification prompt task based on six common word error scenarios experienced by beginning readers was also administered. Results of the phonics survey revealed that 90% of teachers indicated they used phonics in their literacy instruction. Knowledge of basic language constructs was variable: phonological and phonemic knowledge were generally good, but understanding of phonic and morphological constructs was relatively weak. Only 40% of initial word identification prompts were focussed on word-level information; the remainder (60%) were based on context or were non-specific. The implications of these findings for beginning readers are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44419,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","volume":"23 1","pages":"104 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19404158.2018.1467937","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ use of phonics, knowledge of language constructs, and preferred word identification prompts in relation to beginning readers*\",\"authors\":\"J. Chapman, Keith T. Greaney, Alison Arrow, W. Tunmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19404158.2018.1467937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract New Zealand’s approach to literacy instruction is predominantly whole language. Explicit code-orientated literacy instruction is not favoured, however, most teachers are believed to include phonics in their literacy lessons. No study has been reported on phonics use in New Zealand schools. Survey responses on the use of phonics instruction from 666 primary school teachers were analysed. We also assessed knowledge of the basic language constructs related to early reading success with 55 teachers participating in a professional development program on literacy teaching. A word identification prompt task based on six common word error scenarios experienced by beginning readers was also administered. Results of the phonics survey revealed that 90% of teachers indicated they used phonics in their literacy instruction. Knowledge of basic language constructs was variable: phonological and phonemic knowledge were generally good, but understanding of phonic and morphological constructs was relatively weak. Only 40% of initial word identification prompts were focussed on word-level information; the remainder (60%) were based on context or were non-specific. The implications of these findings for beginning readers are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19404158.2018.1467937\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2018.1467937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2018.1467937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

摘要新西兰的识字教学方法主要是全语言教学。明确的以代码为导向的识字教学并不受欢迎,然而,大多数教师被认为在识字课中包括语音。没有关于新西兰学校使用语音的研究报告。分析了666名小学教师对语音教学使用情况的调查结果。我们还评估了与早期阅读成功相关的基本语言结构知识,55名教师参与了识字教学专业发展计划。基于初读者经历的六种常见单词错误场景,还进行了单词识别提示任务。语音调查结果显示,90%的教师表示他们在识字教学中使用了语音。基本语言结构的知识是可变的:语音和音位知识总体上很好,但对语音和形态结构的理解相对较弱。只有40%的初始单词识别提示集中在单词级别的信息上;其余的(60%)是基于上下文或是非特异性的。讨论了这些发现对初读者的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers’ use of phonics, knowledge of language constructs, and preferred word identification prompts in relation to beginning readers*
Abstract New Zealand’s approach to literacy instruction is predominantly whole language. Explicit code-orientated literacy instruction is not favoured, however, most teachers are believed to include phonics in their literacy lessons. No study has been reported on phonics use in New Zealand schools. Survey responses on the use of phonics instruction from 666 primary school teachers were analysed. We also assessed knowledge of the basic language constructs related to early reading success with 55 teachers participating in a professional development program on literacy teaching. A word identification prompt task based on six common word error scenarios experienced by beginning readers was also administered. Results of the phonics survey revealed that 90% of teachers indicated they used phonics in their literacy instruction. Knowledge of basic language constructs was variable: phonological and phonemic knowledge were generally good, but understanding of phonic and morphological constructs was relatively weak. Only 40% of initial word identification prompts were focussed on word-level information; the remainder (60%) were based on context or were non-specific. The implications of these findings for beginning readers are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信