两个山谷的故事:濒危物种政策和巨型袜带蛇的命运

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 FISHERIES
B. Halstead, P. Valcarcel, Richard Kim, A. C. Jordan, Jonathan P. Rose, Shannon M. Skalos, Gabriel A. Reyes, Julia S. M. Ersan, M. Casazza, Allison M. Essert, A. M. Fulton
{"title":"两个山谷的故事:濒危物种政策和巨型袜带蛇的命运","authors":"B. Halstead, P. Valcarcel, Richard Kim, A. C. Jordan, Jonathan P. Rose, Shannon M. Skalos, Gabriel A. Reyes, Julia S. M. Ersan, M. Casazza, Allison M. Essert, A. M. Fulton","doi":"10.51492/CFWJ.CESASI.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the mid-20th Century, giant gartersnakes (Thamnophis gigas) had lost more than 90% of their Central Valley marsh habitat and were extirpated from more than two-thirds of their range. This massive habitat loss led to their inclusion in the inaugural list of rare species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Listing under the CESA provided giant gartersnakes legal protection and mechanisms for recovery, and subsequent listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (federal ESA) further fortified these protections. But how effective has listing under these endangered species acts (ESAs) been at achieving their goal of giant gartersnake recovery? Herein, we review relevant aspects of giant gartersnake ecology, illustrate how listing has benefited giant gartersnakes and what challenges have been faced in slowing declines and recovering populations, and chart a course toward improved conservation, management, and recovery of giant gartersnakes. Although listing as threatened under both state and federal ESAs has not yet achieved recovery of giant gartersnakes, the increased knowledge gained and mechanisms for protecting giant gartersnake habitat on private and public lands developed over the past 50 years has improved conservation of this endemic California snake.","PeriodicalId":29697,"journal":{"name":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A tale of two valleys: endangered species policy and the fate of the giant gartersnake\",\"authors\":\"B. Halstead, P. Valcarcel, Richard Kim, A. C. Jordan, Jonathan P. Rose, Shannon M. Skalos, Gabriel A. Reyes, Julia S. M. Ersan, M. Casazza, Allison M. Essert, A. M. Fulton\",\"doi\":\"10.51492/CFWJ.CESASI.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By the mid-20th Century, giant gartersnakes (Thamnophis gigas) had lost more than 90% of their Central Valley marsh habitat and were extirpated from more than two-thirds of their range. This massive habitat loss led to their inclusion in the inaugural list of rare species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Listing under the CESA provided giant gartersnakes legal protection and mechanisms for recovery, and subsequent listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (federal ESA) further fortified these protections. But how effective has listing under these endangered species acts (ESAs) been at achieving their goal of giant gartersnake recovery? Herein, we review relevant aspects of giant gartersnake ecology, illustrate how listing has benefited giant gartersnakes and what challenges have been faced in slowing declines and recovering populations, and chart a course toward improved conservation, management, and recovery of giant gartersnakes. Although listing as threatened under both state and federal ESAs has not yet achieved recovery of giant gartersnakes, the increased knowledge gained and mechanisms for protecting giant gartersnake habitat on private and public lands developed over the past 50 years has improved conservation of this endemic California snake.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"California Fish and Wildlife Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"California Fish and Wildlife Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51492/CFWJ.CESASI.16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51492/CFWJ.CESASI.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

到20世纪中期,巨型袜带蛇(Thamnophis gigas)已经失去了90%以上的中央山谷沼泽栖息地,超过三分之二的活动范围已经灭绝。这种大规模的栖息地丧失导致它们被列入《加州濒危物种法案》(CESA)的首批稀有物种名单。在CESA下的上市为巨型吊带蛇提供了法律保护和恢复机制,随后在美国濒危物种法案(联邦ESA)下的上市进一步加强了这些保护。但是,在这些濒危物种法案(esa)下的名单在实现巨型袜带蛇恢复的目标方面有多有效呢?在此,我们回顾了巨型吊带蛇生态学的相关方面,说明了上市如何使巨型吊带蛇受益,以及在减缓数量下降和恢复种群方面面临的挑战,并为改善巨型吊带蛇的保护、管理和恢复制定了路线。尽管在州和联邦的esa中被列为受威胁物种的巨型吊带蛇还没有恢复,但在过去的50年里,在私人和公共土地上发展起来的保护巨型吊带蛇栖息地的知识和机制的增加,改善了对这种加州特有蛇的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A tale of two valleys: endangered species policy and the fate of the giant gartersnake
By the mid-20th Century, giant gartersnakes (Thamnophis gigas) had lost more than 90% of their Central Valley marsh habitat and were extirpated from more than two-thirds of their range. This massive habitat loss led to their inclusion in the inaugural list of rare species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Listing under the CESA provided giant gartersnakes legal protection and mechanisms for recovery, and subsequent listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (federal ESA) further fortified these protections. But how effective has listing under these endangered species acts (ESAs) been at achieving their goal of giant gartersnake recovery? Herein, we review relevant aspects of giant gartersnake ecology, illustrate how listing has benefited giant gartersnakes and what challenges have been faced in slowing declines and recovering populations, and chart a course toward improved conservation, management, and recovery of giant gartersnakes. Although listing as threatened under both state and federal ESAs has not yet achieved recovery of giant gartersnakes, the increased knowledge gained and mechanisms for protecting giant gartersnake habitat on private and public lands developed over the past 50 years has improved conservation of this endemic California snake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信