在管理研究中使用偏最小二乘路径模型的五个常见错误

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Asyraf Afthanorhan, Zainudin Awang, Nazim Aimran
{"title":"在管理研究中使用偏最小二乘路径模型的五个常见错误","authors":"Asyraf Afthanorhan, Zainudin Awang, Nazim Aimran","doi":"10.7903/CMR.20247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) in management research has now been acknowledged, although the PLS-PM was developed for a reason. First, the PLS-PM was developed as an alternative to Covariance based Structural Equation Modeling (CBSEM) when exploratory research is conducted. As far as this method concerned, many researchers are misused or overuse the application of PLS-PM without understanding the basic knowledge in structural equation modeling. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the five common mistakes (data distributions, sample size limitations, unsatisfactory fitness index, misunderstanding between confirmatory and exploratory research, and poor factor loadings) for using PLS-PM over CB-SEM in management research. We concluded that the researchers should respect these methods and justify their use when conducting the research projects because some of the projects might be better for CB-SEM or PLS-PM.","PeriodicalId":36973,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Management Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"255-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five Common Mistakes for Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) in Management Research\",\"authors\":\"Asyraf Afthanorhan, Zainudin Awang, Nazim Aimran\",\"doi\":\"10.7903/CMR.20247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The value of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) in management research has now been acknowledged, although the PLS-PM was developed for a reason. First, the PLS-PM was developed as an alternative to Covariance based Structural Equation Modeling (CBSEM) when exploratory research is conducted. As far as this method concerned, many researchers are misused or overuse the application of PLS-PM without understanding the basic knowledge in structural equation modeling. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the five common mistakes (data distributions, sample size limitations, unsatisfactory fitness index, misunderstanding between confirmatory and exploratory research, and poor factor loadings) for using PLS-PM over CB-SEM in management research. We concluded that the researchers should respect these methods and justify their use when conducting the research projects because some of the projects might be better for CB-SEM or PLS-PM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Management Research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"255-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7903/CMR.20247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7903/CMR.20247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

偏最小二乘路径建模(PLS-PM)在管理研究中的价值现已得到承认,尽管PLS-PM的发展是有原因的。首先,在探索性研究中,开发了PLS-PM作为基于协方差的结构方程模型(CBSEM)的替代方案。就该方法而言,许多研究人员在不了解结构方程建模的基本知识的情况下误用或过度使用PLS-PM。因此,本文的目的是讨论在管理研究中使用PLS-PM而不是CB-SEM的五个常见错误(数据分布、样本量限制、适应度指数不理想、验证性研究和探索性研究之间的误解以及不良的因子负荷)。我们的结论是,研究人员应该尊重这些方法,并在进行研究项目时证明它们的使用是合理的,因为有些项目可能更适合CB-SEM或PLS-PM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Five Common Mistakes for Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) in Management Research
The value of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) in management research has now been acknowledged, although the PLS-PM was developed for a reason. First, the PLS-PM was developed as an alternative to Covariance based Structural Equation Modeling (CBSEM) when exploratory research is conducted. As far as this method concerned, many researchers are misused or overuse the application of PLS-PM without understanding the basic knowledge in structural equation modeling. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the five common mistakes (data distributions, sample size limitations, unsatisfactory fitness index, misunderstanding between confirmatory and exploratory research, and poor factor loadings) for using PLS-PM over CB-SEM in management research. We concluded that the researchers should respect these methods and justify their use when conducting the research projects because some of the projects might be better for CB-SEM or PLS-PM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Management Research
Contemporary Management Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信