计算机认知康复程序双任务训练对老年人整体功能影响的系统评价

Mi Kyeong Kim, Hamin Lee, H. Park
{"title":"计算机认知康复程序双任务训练对老年人整体功能影响的系统评价","authors":"Mi Kyeong Kim, Hamin Lee, H. Park","doi":"10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out whether dual task training using computerized cognitive rehabilitation programs is effective in improving the overall function of o lder a dults u sing t he m ethod of s ystematic r eview. A n database s earch w as p erformed u sing CINAH L, P ubmed, Scopus, and Web Of Science from January 2017 to December 2021. To collect literature the following terms were used; “dual task” AND “Computerized cognitive training” AND (“Older” OR “Elder”). The PEDro scale was used for quality assessment. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale and PICOTS-SD (Participation, Intervention, Comparisons, Outcomes, Timing of Outcome Measurement, Settings, Study design) were used for quality assessment and providing a systematic basis of the literature. In the five finally selected studies, a total of 1,073 older adults with an average age of 64.0 to 82.7 years were recruited. The average time to perform one intervention was 58 minutes, and the most common was three times a week, and the intervention period ranged from 8 to 12 weeks. In a total of five studies, physical function factors, cognitive factors, behavioral factors, daily life function factors, and weakness factor evaluation tools were used to confirm the overall function of older adults. Five studies were found to have significant effects in at least one area, including physical function, cognitive function, behavioral function, ability to perform daily life activities, and weakness after dual task training. Further work is needed evaluating not only the assessment tool but also the performance and the level of dual tasks in order to more clearly understand the effect on the overall function of older adults.","PeriodicalId":90513,"journal":{"name":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of the Effect of Dual Task Training Using Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Program on the Overall Function of Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Mi Kyeong Kim, Hamin Lee, H. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to find out whether dual task training using computerized cognitive rehabilitation programs is effective in improving the overall function of o lder a dults u sing t he m ethod of s ystematic r eview. A n database s earch w as p erformed u sing CINAH L, P ubmed, Scopus, and Web Of Science from January 2017 to December 2021. To collect literature the following terms were used; “dual task” AND “Computerized cognitive training” AND (“Older” OR “Elder”). The PEDro scale was used for quality assessment. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale and PICOTS-SD (Participation, Intervention, Comparisons, Outcomes, Timing of Outcome Measurement, Settings, Study design) were used for quality assessment and providing a systematic basis of the literature. In the five finally selected studies, a total of 1,073 older adults with an average age of 64.0 to 82.7 years were recruited. The average time to perform one intervention was 58 minutes, and the most common was three times a week, and the intervention period ranged from 8 to 12 weeks. In a total of five studies, physical function factors, cognitive factors, behavioral factors, daily life function factors, and weakness factor evaluation tools were used to confirm the overall function of older adults. Five studies were found to have significant effects in at least one area, including physical function, cognitive function, behavioral function, ability to perform daily life activities, and weakness after dual task training. Further work is needed evaluating not only the assessment tool but also the performance and the level of dual tasks in order to more clearly understand the effect on the overall function of older adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解使用计算机认知康复程序的双任务训练是否能有效地利用系统观察的方法改善成人的整体功能。2017年1月至2021年12月,使用CINAH L、p Submed、Scopus和Web Of Science进行了数据库搜索。为了收集文献,使用了以下术语:;“双重任务”与“计算机化认知训练”与(“老年人”或“老年”)。PEDro量表用于质量评估。物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表和PICOTS-SD(参与、干预、比较、结果、结果测量时间、设置、研究设计)用于质量评估,并为文献提供系统基础。在最终选定的五项研究中,共招募了1073名平均年龄在64.0至82.7岁之间的老年人。进行一次干预的平均时间为58分钟,最常见的是每周三次,干预期为8-12周。在总共五项研究中,使用身体功能因素、认知因素、行为因素、日常生活功能因素和弱点因素评估工具来确认老年人的整体功能。五项研究被发现在至少一个领域具有显著影响,包括身体功能、认知功能、行为功能、进行日常生活活动的能力以及双重任务训练后的虚弱。不仅需要评估评估工具,还需要评估双重任务的表现和水平,以便更清楚地了解对老年人整体功能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of the Effect of Dual Task Training Using Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Program on the Overall Function of Older Adults
This study aims to find out whether dual task training using computerized cognitive rehabilitation programs is effective in improving the overall function of o lder a dults u sing t he m ethod of s ystematic r eview. A n database s earch w as p erformed u sing CINAH L, P ubmed, Scopus, and Web Of Science from January 2017 to December 2021. To collect literature the following terms were used; “dual task” AND “Computerized cognitive training” AND (“Older” OR “Elder”). The PEDro scale was used for quality assessment. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale and PICOTS-SD (Participation, Intervention, Comparisons, Outcomes, Timing of Outcome Measurement, Settings, Study design) were used for quality assessment and providing a systematic basis of the literature. In the five finally selected studies, a total of 1,073 older adults with an average age of 64.0 to 82.7 years were recruited. The average time to perform one intervention was 58 minutes, and the most common was three times a week, and the intervention period ranged from 8 to 12 weeks. In a total of five studies, physical function factors, cognitive factors, behavioral factors, daily life function factors, and weakness factor evaluation tools were used to confirm the overall function of older adults. Five studies were found to have significant effects in at least one area, including physical function, cognitive function, behavioral function, ability to perform daily life activities, and weakness after dual task training. Further work is needed evaluating not only the assessment tool but also the performance and the level of dual tasks in order to more clearly understand the effect on the overall function of older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信