学生投入与辅导技巧自我效能:两种课程形式之比较

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION Pub Date : 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1002/ceas.12243

Erin Chase McCarty Mason, Franco Dispenza, Vanessa Placeres, Ramona Grad, Merideth Ray, Adrianne Robertson, Daniel Dosal-Terminel, Mike Metzler

引用次数: 2

摘要

一项组间、重复测量的研究比较了职业咨询课程的各个部分。其中一门课程采用翻转课堂设计，而另一门课程采用讲课方式。翻转课堂在学生的职业咨询自我效能和积极参与方面获得了更高的评分。在帮助技能自我效能感方面，课程之间没有差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Student engagement and counseling skill self-efficacy: Comparing two course formats

A between-group, repeated-measures study compared sections of a career counseling course. One course used a flipped classroom design, while the other used a lecture. The flipped classroom yielded higher ratings of career counseling self-efficacy and active engagement among students. There were no differences in helping skills self-efficacy between the courses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

38.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Counselor Education and Supervision is dedicated to publishing manuscripts concerned with research, theory development, or program applications related to counselor education and supervision. It is concerned with the preparation and supervision of counselors in agency or school settings, in colleges and universities or at local, state, or federal levels. This journal is the official publication of the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES), a member association of the American Counseling Association (ACA).