混合寡头垄断中的自由进入导致私有化不足?

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Leonard F. S. Wang, Yoshihiro Tomaru, Chan Zhou
{"title":"混合寡头垄断中的自由进入导致私有化不足?","authors":"Leonard F. S. Wang,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Tomaru,&nbsp;Chan Zhou","doi":"10.1111/ijet.12390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates privatization policy in mixed oligopoly when partial privatization changes a technological difference between semi-public and private firms. It shows that when the degree of privatization is partial, privatization is insufficient. Furthermore, privatization is more likely to be insufficient as the market becomes more competitive. If the cost efficiency gain is captured by decreasing the degree of privatization, privatization is insufficient regardless of whether entry by private firms is restricted or free.</p>","PeriodicalId":44551,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economic Theory","volume":"20 1","pages":"56-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free entry in mixed oligopoly leads to insufficient privatization?\",\"authors\":\"Leonard F. S. Wang,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Tomaru,&nbsp;Chan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijet.12390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper investigates privatization policy in mixed oligopoly when partial privatization changes a technological difference between semi-public and private firms. It shows that when the degree of privatization is partial, privatization is insufficient. Furthermore, privatization is more likely to be insufficient as the market becomes more competitive. If the cost efficiency gain is captured by decreasing the degree of privatization, privatization is insufficient regardless of whether entry by private firms is restricted or free.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Economic Theory\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"56-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Economic Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijet.12390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijet.12390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了混合寡头垄断中的私有化政策,当部分私有化改变了半公营和私营企业之间的技术差异时。这表明,当私有化程度是局部的时,私有化是不够的。此外,随着市场竞争的加剧,私有化更有可能是不够的。如果通过降低私有化程度来获得成本效益收益,那么无论私营公司的进入是受限制的还是免费的,私有化都是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Free entry in mixed oligopoly leads to insufficient privatization?

This paper investigates privatization policy in mixed oligopoly when partial privatization changes a technological difference between semi-public and private firms. It shows that when the degree of privatization is partial, privatization is insufficient. Furthermore, privatization is more likely to be insufficient as the market becomes more competitive. If the cost efficiency gain is captured by decreasing the degree of privatization, privatization is insufficient regardless of whether entry by private firms is restricted or free.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信