意见障碍框架在灾难性冲突中的应用:一篇实践论文

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
T. Ringer
{"title":"意见障碍框架在灾难性冲突中的应用:一篇实践论文","authors":"T. Ringer","doi":"10.33212/osd.v19n2.2019.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Groups and teams that are involved in acute and/or prolonged conflict with each other create impermeable barriers between them that robustly resist change. This article uses the framework of “opinion blocks” to illustrate a means by which such conflict can worked with. Whilst the framework outlined is relatively recent, it has enabled the author to engage with situations of “catastrophic” conflict in a way that has resulted in surprising improvements in the effectiveness of collaboration between the involved parties. The opinion blocks framework was introduced in an earlier article in this journal (Ringer, 2017b) in which the etiology of “collective self-righteousness” was examined. The reader is advised to refer to this earlier article for a theoretical background to the opinion blocks framework. The article that follows uses a modified real-life example from the author’s consulting practice to illustrate the principles involved.","PeriodicalId":41413,"journal":{"name":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the opinion blocks framework in catastrophic conflict: a practice paper\",\"authors\":\"T. Ringer\",\"doi\":\"10.33212/osd.v19n2.2019.264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Groups and teams that are involved in acute and/or prolonged conflict with each other create impermeable barriers between them that robustly resist change. This article uses the framework of “opinion blocks” to illustrate a means by which such conflict can worked with. Whilst the framework outlined is relatively recent, it has enabled the author to engage with situations of “catastrophic” conflict in a way that has resulted in surprising improvements in the effectiveness of collaboration between the involved parties. The opinion blocks framework was introduced in an earlier article in this journal (Ringer, 2017b) in which the etiology of “collective self-righteousness” was examined. The reader is advised to refer to this earlier article for a theoretical background to the opinion blocks framework. The article that follows uses a modified real-life example from the author’s consulting practice to illustrate the principles involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organisational and Social Dynamics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organisational and Social Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33212/osd.v19n2.2019.264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33212/osd.v19n2.2019.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

陷入尖锐和/或长期冲突的团体和团队会在他们之间产生不可渗透的障碍,从而强烈地抵制变革。本文使用“意见障碍”的框架来说明解决这种冲突的方法。虽然概述的框架是相对较新的,但它使作者能够以一种方式处理“灾难性”冲突的情况,从而使有关各方之间的合作效率得到了惊人的提高。意见障碍框架在本期刊的早期文章中被引入(Ringer, 2017b),其中研究了“集体自以为是”的病因。建议读者参考之前的文章,了解意见块框架的理论背景。下面的文章使用了作者咨询实践中的一个修改后的现实生活示例来说明所涉及的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying the opinion blocks framework in catastrophic conflict: a practice paper
Groups and teams that are involved in acute and/or prolonged conflict with each other create impermeable barriers between them that robustly resist change. This article uses the framework of “opinion blocks” to illustrate a means by which such conflict can worked with. Whilst the framework outlined is relatively recent, it has enabled the author to engage with situations of “catastrophic” conflict in a way that has resulted in surprising improvements in the effectiveness of collaboration between the involved parties. The opinion blocks framework was introduced in an earlier article in this journal (Ringer, 2017b) in which the etiology of “collective self-righteousness” was examined. The reader is advised to refer to this earlier article for a theoretical background to the opinion blocks framework. The article that follows uses a modified real-life example from the author’s consulting practice to illustrate the principles involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organisational and Social Dynamics
Organisational and Social Dynamics PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: O&SD aims to create a deeper understanding of organisational and social processes and their effects on individuals, and to provide a forum for both theoretical and applied papers addressing emerging issues in societies and organisations from a psycho-social perspective. The editors seek to sustain a creative tension between scientific rigour and popular appeal, by developing conversations with the professional and social scientific worlds and opening them to practitioners and reflective citizens everywhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信