合成氮施用历史对比土壤中堆肥和干粪的氮肥价值

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Adam D. Langworthy, Ross Corkrey, Richard P. Rawnsley, Pieter J. M. Raedts, James L. Hills
{"title":"合成氮施用历史对比土壤中堆肥和干粪的氮肥价值","authors":"Adam D. Langworthy,&nbsp;Ross Corkrey,&nbsp;Richard P. Rawnsley,&nbsp;Pieter J. M. Raedts,&nbsp;James L. Hills","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>If the production of forage for dairy cattle is to become less reliant on synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers, there is need to better understand and account for the N contributed by on-farm and imported organic amendments. A 254-day aerobic soil incubation study (typical length of a growing season in many temperate dairying regions) quantified the inorganic (mineral) N supply from a commercial compost and dried bovine dung (i.e., on-farm effluent solids). Amendments were incubated in soils with contrasting synthetic N fertilization histories (i.e., 70–100 vs. 350–400 kg N/ha per year) to evaluate if higher synthetic N fertilization histories would reduce the lag time that often exists between organic amendment application and significant release of inorganic N for plant uptake. This proposition was based on previous research, which showed greater soil inorganic N availability accelerating organic amendment decomposition. Our experiment did find that the release of inorganic N from evaluated organic amendments was greater in soils with higher synthetic N fertilization histories, but that this effect was not apparent until after the first 6-months of this 9-month experiment. Despite this finding, soils with contrasting synthetic N fertilization histories were not found to differ in their initial inorganic N content, nor microbial activity or other physiochemical properties known to affect N mineralization. Our study highlighted the long-term vision needed when transitioning from synthetic N fertilizers to organic amendments, with most of the N present in the compost and dried dung remaining unavailable for forage production (i.e., remained bound in organic carbon-based molecules).</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"78 1","pages":"184-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12593","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrogen fertilization value of compost and dried dung in soils with contrasting synthetic nitrogen fertilization histories\",\"authors\":\"Adam D. Langworthy,&nbsp;Ross Corkrey,&nbsp;Richard P. Rawnsley,&nbsp;Pieter J. M. Raedts,&nbsp;James L. Hills\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>If the production of forage for dairy cattle is to become less reliant on synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers, there is need to better understand and account for the N contributed by on-farm and imported organic amendments. A 254-day aerobic soil incubation study (typical length of a growing season in many temperate dairying regions) quantified the inorganic (mineral) N supply from a commercial compost and dried bovine dung (i.e., on-farm effluent solids). Amendments were incubated in soils with contrasting synthetic N fertilization histories (i.e., 70–100 vs. 350–400 kg N/ha per year) to evaluate if higher synthetic N fertilization histories would reduce the lag time that often exists between organic amendment application and significant release of inorganic N for plant uptake. This proposition was based on previous research, which showed greater soil inorganic N availability accelerating organic amendment decomposition. Our experiment did find that the release of inorganic N from evaluated organic amendments was greater in soils with higher synthetic N fertilization histories, but that this effect was not apparent until after the first 6-months of this 9-month experiment. Despite this finding, soils with contrasting synthetic N fertilization histories were not found to differ in their initial inorganic N content, nor microbial activity or other physiochemical properties known to affect N mineralization. Our study highlighted the long-term vision needed when transitioning from synthetic N fertilizers to organic amendments, with most of the N present in the compost and dried dung remaining unavailable for forage production (i.e., remained bound in organic carbon-based molecules).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"184-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12593\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12593\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果奶牛饲料的生产要减少对合成氮肥的依赖,就需要更好地了解和解释农场和进口有机改进剂所贡献的氮。一项为期254天的好氧土壤孵化研究(许多温带奶牛场生长季节的典型长度)量化了商业堆肥和干牛粪(即农场流出固体)提供的无机(矿物)氮。在不同的合成氮施肥历史(即70-100和350-400公斤N/公顷/年)的土壤中培养改良剂,以评估较高的合成氮施肥历史是否会减少施用有机改良剂与植物吸收无机氮显著释放之间的滞后时间。这一主张是基于以往的研究结果,即土壤无机氮有效性的提高加速了有机修正的分解。我们的实验确实发现,在合成氮施用历史较高的土壤中,有机改剂剂对无机氮的释放更大,但这种影响直到9个月试验的前6个月之后才显现出来。尽管有这一发现,不同合成氮肥历史的土壤在初始无机氮含量、微生物活性或其他已知影响氮矿化的理化性质方面没有发现差异。我们的研究强调了从合成氮肥向有机改进剂过渡所需要的长期愿景,因为堆肥和干燥粪便中的大部分氮素仍然无法用于饲料生产(即仍然结合在有机碳基分子中)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nitrogen fertilization value of compost and dried dung in soils with contrasting synthetic nitrogen fertilization histories

Nitrogen fertilization value of compost and dried dung in soils with contrasting synthetic nitrogen fertilization histories

If the production of forage for dairy cattle is to become less reliant on synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers, there is need to better understand and account for the N contributed by on-farm and imported organic amendments. A 254-day aerobic soil incubation study (typical length of a growing season in many temperate dairying regions) quantified the inorganic (mineral) N supply from a commercial compost and dried bovine dung (i.e., on-farm effluent solids). Amendments were incubated in soils with contrasting synthetic N fertilization histories (i.e., 70–100 vs. 350–400 kg N/ha per year) to evaluate if higher synthetic N fertilization histories would reduce the lag time that often exists between organic amendment application and significant release of inorganic N for plant uptake. This proposition was based on previous research, which showed greater soil inorganic N availability accelerating organic amendment decomposition. Our experiment did find that the release of inorganic N from evaluated organic amendments was greater in soils with higher synthetic N fertilization histories, but that this effect was not apparent until after the first 6-months of this 9-month experiment. Despite this finding, soils with contrasting synthetic N fertilization histories were not found to differ in their initial inorganic N content, nor microbial activity or other physiochemical properties known to affect N mineralization. Our study highlighted the long-term vision needed when transitioning from synthetic N fertilizers to organic amendments, with most of the N present in the compost and dried dung remaining unavailable for forage production (i.e., remained bound in organic carbon-based molecules).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信