{"title":"自我与同一性的话语:一种重新思考话语的列文式方法","authors":"Donald S. Blumenfeld-Jones","doi":"10.1080/01596306.2021.2021644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The distinction between ‘self’ and ‘identity’ is explored using James Baldwin’s work and Western anthropology’s assignment of ‘self’ only to Western dominant cultures. Anthropologists perform epistemicide on these ‘less advanced’ cultures by reducing them to identification with the group with no inner life. Identity is then explored as an artifact of language through de Saussure, Derrida, and Foucault. Emmanuel Levinas’ analysis of how we craft identities (through discourse) departs from discourse through a self (transcendent and unclassifiable through language). Levinas’ approach to ethics depends on what language cannot deliver, an awareness of an Other as radically separate. The Other escapes linguistic machinations and establishes our individual identities. Responsibility emerges for the infinite Other by recognizing we cannot control another. Ironically, we are connected to an Other through humility of not knowing the Other which fulfills our desire for knowing (by not knowing), what Levinas terms ‘metaphysical desire’.","PeriodicalId":47908,"journal":{"name":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"423 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The discourses of self and identity: a Levinasian approach to rethinking discourse\",\"authors\":\"Donald S. Blumenfeld-Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01596306.2021.2021644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The distinction between ‘self’ and ‘identity’ is explored using James Baldwin’s work and Western anthropology’s assignment of ‘self’ only to Western dominant cultures. Anthropologists perform epistemicide on these ‘less advanced’ cultures by reducing them to identification with the group with no inner life. Identity is then explored as an artifact of language through de Saussure, Derrida, and Foucault. Emmanuel Levinas’ analysis of how we craft identities (through discourse) departs from discourse through a self (transcendent and unclassifiable through language). Levinas’ approach to ethics depends on what language cannot deliver, an awareness of an Other as radically separate. The Other escapes linguistic machinations and establishes our individual identities. Responsibility emerges for the infinite Other by recognizing we cannot control another. Ironically, we are connected to an Other through humility of not knowing the Other which fulfills our desire for knowing (by not knowing), what Levinas terms ‘metaphysical desire’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"423 - 440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.2021644\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.2021644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The discourses of self and identity: a Levinasian approach to rethinking discourse
ABSTRACT The distinction between ‘self’ and ‘identity’ is explored using James Baldwin’s work and Western anthropology’s assignment of ‘self’ only to Western dominant cultures. Anthropologists perform epistemicide on these ‘less advanced’ cultures by reducing them to identification with the group with no inner life. Identity is then explored as an artifact of language through de Saussure, Derrida, and Foucault. Emmanuel Levinas’ analysis of how we craft identities (through discourse) departs from discourse through a self (transcendent and unclassifiable through language). Levinas’ approach to ethics depends on what language cannot deliver, an awareness of an Other as radically separate. The Other escapes linguistic machinations and establishes our individual identities. Responsibility emerges for the infinite Other by recognizing we cannot control another. Ironically, we are connected to an Other through humility of not knowing the Other which fulfills our desire for knowing (by not knowing), what Levinas terms ‘metaphysical desire’.
期刊介绍:
Discourse is an international, fully peer-reviewed journal publishing contemporary research and theorising in the cultural politics of education. The journal publishes academic articles from throughout the world which contribute to contemporary debates on the new social, cultural and political configurations that now mark education as a highly contested but important cultural site. Discourse adopts a broadly critical orientation, but is not tied to any particular ideological, disciplinary or methodological position. It encourages interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of educational theory, policy and practice. It welcomes papers which explore speculative ideas in education, are written in innovative ways, or are presented in experimental ways.